James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The proximate significance of this paper, therefore, is now outside of
academic discourse entirely and threatens the stability of the media and
political echo-chamber. How? Because this is a commercial device and
rational evaluation of the paper is
The article make the buzz worldwide, as if there was many
lurkers entrenched and waiting for real news (would be rational).
there is already people prepared to oil the revolution...
http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1514-LENR-Cities-to-propose-it-s-project-to-Neuchatel-(Switzerland)
Looking at this paper on the cost components of coal fired power plants:
http://cedm.epp.cmu.edu/files/workingpapers/Trancik-Coal_Energy_Policy.pdf
it is clear that although the capital service cost remains, and represents
50% of the delivered electrical cost, an appropriately engineered drop-in
From: Alain Sepeda
The article makes the buzz worldwide, as if there was many lurkers
entrenched and waiting for real news (would be rational). there is already
people prepared to oil the revolution...
Speaking of oil - when you think about the big picture and look for the
potential
Gravity
[edithttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isotope_separationaction=editsection=11
]
Isotopes of Carbon, Oxygen, and Nitrogen can be purified by chilling these
gases or compounds nearly to their liquification temperature in very tall
columns (200 to 700 feet tall—70 to 200 meters).
The candidate who wishes to become the next in line after Obama would be
wise to get on this bandwagon at an early stage. However, that candidate
will probably have to stand up against Big Oil, early-on - since any
expedited effort to get LENR into production will hurt hat industry
eventually but
DGT's ICCF17 paper suggests that enrichment is not needed:
We realized also that Ni58, Ni60, Ni62and Ni64 stable isotopes where
“willing” to participate in a LENR reaction, whilst Ni61 was not. So there
was no need for any costly enrichment method.
Ni58 is 68% of the natural metal while Ni60 is
From: Franco Talari
DGT's ICCF17 paper suggests that enrichment is not needed:
We realized also that Ni58, Ni60, Ni62and Ni64 stable isotopes where
willing to participate in a LENR reaction, whilst Ni61 was not. So there
was no need for any costly enrichment method.
But DGT has never
Rossi could have stumbled on a simple way like cryogenic distillation -
who knows?
More likely, he gets it from ENEA Frascati - using Focardi's connections.
From: James Bowery
Isotopes of Carbon, Oxygen, and Nitrogen can be purified by chilling these
gases or compounds nearly to
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
…that is going to be our collective curse, or opportunity …depending on a
few political decisions soon to be on the horizon.
Yes -- this is an interesting thought. Assume for the moment that Rossi
comes through and we
Reference:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Hadjichristos-Technical-Characteristics-Paper.pdf
Please explain how the DGT process produces twice as much nickel than their
reactor originally contains given your conjecture about NI62.
The test starts out with
11 matches
Mail list logo
