He seems to be calling the new 1MW configuration the honeycat -- which I take
to be a merger of honeycomb and ecat
Andrea Rossi
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:42 PM
Dear Italo R.
I am not kidding: in these days ( also today, even if it is Sunday) we are
working on the hot cat, and we are arriving
Again, I call upon you who _do_ know what the reaction is to put forth
the experiment that will demonstrate it is what they say it is and thereby
discount the others who know what the reaction is. You know -- multiple
competing hypotheses -- strong inference and all that.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I call upon you who _do_ know what the reaction is to put forth
the experiment that will demonstrate it is what they say it is and thereby
discount the others who know what the reaction is.
Amen.
- Jed
More tea-leaf reading : problems with the domestic certification
?
Andrea Rossi
August 31st, 2012 at 9:34 AM
Dear Koen Vandewalle:
We have all the resources necessary for a development of our technology,
based on our businessplant. I do not think we will have delays as for the
industrial
A cold fusion nuclear reactor that that puts out as much energy and density
as a common nuclear reactor cannot possibly be dangerous.
2012/8/31 Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com
More tea-leaf reading : problems with the domestic certification ?
Andrea Rossi
August 31st, 2012 at 9:34
It is if you don't know what the reaction is!
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
A cold fusion nuclear reactor that that puts out as much energy and
density as a common nuclear reactor cannot possibly be dangerous.
2012/8/31 Alan J Fletcher
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzLobQxY6gg
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
A cold fusion nuclear reactor that that puts out as much energy and
density as a common nuclear reactor cannot possibly be dangerous.
2012/8/31 Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
This is incredible power density. Seems unbelievable how you can pack
1MW output from these dimensions. If true, this is more revolutionary than
we thought.
I did some rough calculations. With diameter of the cylinder at 1.2 m,
the area is 1.13 m2. Assuming
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:50 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
“Would that be Russell's Teapot you're referring to?”
Oh heavens no…
It’s the Mad Hatter’s (aka, Richard Garwin) teapot, of course.
;-)
T
I find it extremely difficult to take anything AR says seriously. His
research seems to be advancing too fast even if he does have
assistance from the NRL, which I doubt would be taking place in a
warehouse in Italy.
Just my opinion. I could be wrong.
T
Terry,
His progress seems fast to you because he has figured how to warp time with
his not yet disclosed T-cat device. To him he has been working on it for
50 years . That is approx 25:1 time dilation... If you watch his hair grow
closely you can tell. :)
On Thursday, August 30, 2012, Terry
It does not look so fast if you assume that he work with a corporate team
managed by professional (ie, not him).
Moreover the result are good but not so huge, since the reactor seems still
slow to start, and activated simply by heat. COP limitation, if real, seems
simply related to simple control
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
It does not look so fast if you assume that he work with a corporate team
managed by professional (ie, not him).
I would sooner believe that Rossi's device produces 1 MW and it is a time
machine. Rossi will never work with any team, managed by anyone,
To bet in what sense? That he has a work able device or that he has
anything at all?
2012/8/30 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
as I said before, you would have to be even crazier to bet against Rossi.
- Jed
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
To bet in what sense? That he has a work able device or that he has
anything at all?
Everything that Rossi does says is in a state of Quantum Indeterminacy.
The act of betting may tilt events one way or the other. It is best not to
go there.
- Jed
Of course I agree with Jed. This is the same plague that effects all of
these devices.
Uncertainty? Instability? Unreliability? Collapsed matter? Life
imitating science? I also worry about health effects unless properly
shielded and isolated.
Stewart
http://wp.me/p26aeb-4
On Thu, Aug 30,
2012/8/30 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
To bet in what sense? That he has a work able device or that he has
anything at all?
Everything that Rossi does says is in a state of Quantum Indeterminacy.
The act of betting may tilt events one way
Only I think in the case of these devices the cat can also jump thru the
box or consume the box if he/she is large and hungry enough...
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/8/30 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Daniel Rocha
The probable reason for Rossi to give feedback on his status is getting
technical suggestions that his small team of developers is not able to
generate on such a short time frame. And he's getting a lot of free usefull
feedback at his blog.
We simply don't know the qualifications of his staff
ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course I agree with Jed. This is the same plague that effects all of
these devices.
Well, not the small scale cold fusion devices at places like SRI, thank
goodness. They are established beyond any rational doubt.
If I may be a little more serious
vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 2:04 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
OK, correcting this. I think I am mixing up MW electric and MW thermal. A like
sized region of a commercial fission core is producing about three times this
much thermal output, ~3MW. Plants of that generation
Actually, I hope you are wrong. We need these systems ASAP.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 7:29 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
I find it extremely difficult to take anything AR says
...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 7:29 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
I find it extremely difficult to take anything AR says seriously. His
research seems to be advancing too fast even if he does have
assistance from the NRL, which I doubt would be taking
future.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 7:54 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
Terry,
His progress seems fast to you because he has figured how to warp time with his
not yet disclosed T-cat
I agree, I think Rossi has come upon anomalous heat/energy like many others
including SRI, DGT, etc.
You are right, the smaller the scale, the more the reliability/less
uncertainty. Nature keeps atoms, electrons and protons small because by
themselves, they are uncertain. Orbits due to
Hmm, a) sounds very realistic
2012/8/30 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
If Rossi says he is shocked this could mean more things:
a) he is not shocked but knows that some shocks are good in a story,
b) be he is not shocked but wants the reader be shocked;
c) he is sincerely shocked
In reply to Akira Shirakawa's message of Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:32:07 +0200:
Hi,
One drawback I foresee is that by packing them all together in a small
container, he is making it difficult to replace an individual unit on the fly.
IOW it may be difficult to extract a single defective unit while
-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 7:29 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
I find it extremely difficult to take anything AR says seriously. His
research seems to be advancing too fast even if he does have
assistance from
Or it might be that after 3 years he does not yet have a stable reactor,
like DGT, Rohners, Terrawatt, etc. these things might last for a short
period of time for a demo but then break down in short order. They run
just long enough to show a patent officer or inspector or investor...
On
Item E Independent test showed no anomalous energy.
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 7:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
I like D here; He has 83 people working for him in his company. Delegating
This is incredible power density. Seems unbelievable how you can pack 1MW
output from these dimensions. If true, this is more revolutionary than we
thought.
I did some rough calculations. With diameter of the cylinder at 1.2 m, the
area is 1.13 m2. Assuming that the coolant pipes take up
Rossi adopts Chan last year:
AnonymousDecember 18, 2011 12:42 PM
http://opensourcenuclearfuel.blogspot.com/2011/11/possible-activator-for-gas-loaded-lenr.html?showComment=1324240950625#c4302940741857909284
Used LiH from
On 2012-08-30 00:31, Jojo Jaro wrote:
I did some rough calculations. With diameter of the cylinder at 1.2 m,
the area is 1.13 m2. Assuming that the coolant pipes take up about 50%
if this area, and fitting remaining area with 100 reactors. Each
reactor would have a diameter of 4.2 cm. Each
I talking about the area of the openning, not the area of the circumference of
the cylinder.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
Jojo, I get 3.77 square meters
I see now what you are saying.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 29, 2012 7:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
I talking about the area of the openning, not the area of the circumference of
the cylinder
: Wed, Aug 29, 2012 7:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
I talking about the area of the openning, not the area of the
circumference of the cylinder.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
It is going to be revealed soon the e-cat is a time machine too.
And antigravity.
T
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
It is going to be revealed soon the e-cat is a time machine too.
And antigravity.
T
and sausage maker.
harry
And tea kettle.
T
Terry, do I detect a bit of sarcasm?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 29, 2012 11:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
And tea kettle.
T
Would that be Russell's Teapot you're referring to? ;-)
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
And tea kettle.
T
Would that be Russell's Teapot you're referring to?
Oh heavens no.
It's the Mad Hatter's (aka, Richard Garwin) teapot, of course.
From: Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
Would
vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 29, 2012 6:31 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said...
This is incredible power density. Seems unbelievable how you can pack
1MW output from these dimensions. If true, this is more revolutionary than
we thought.
I did some rough calculations. With diameter
43 matches
Mail list logo
