If my memory serves me the problem was that Apple couldn't figure out how to
get cmake installed on the Apple build system machine.
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org]
on behalf of Dirk Pranke
With svn up you are just as likely to see a conflict.
From: ryosuke.n...@gmail.com [ryosuke.n...@gmail.com] on behalf of Ryosuke Niwa
[rn...@webkit.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 3:12 PM
To: Adam Treat
Cc: Ashod Nakashian; WebKit Development
Subject: Re
Indeed it is.
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org]
on behalf of Carlos Garcia Campos [carlo...@webkit.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:38 PM
To: Alexis Menard
Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re:
There is nothing about git that forces you to have multiple branches locally.
Good practice, yes, but nothing forcing it. As for the difficulty of resolving
conflicts between patches you've made locally and changes made on the shared
repository since you started making your local patches...
Bill, could you look over these CMake files and give it an informal review?
On Monday 03 May 2010 02:37:22 pm Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you know, the EFL port is almost all merged, we just lack a
build system in SVN by now. We initially started with automake,
Can someone from Apple comment on whether it is possible to include the
sources to CMake and then the CMake could bootstrap itself with only
dependency on the compiler? This would seem an acceptable solution, no?
Adam
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 01:06:43 pm Bradley Nelson wrote:
Would prebuilt
go through a
lot of effort trying to convert Apple's Windows port to a CMake build for demo.
Adam
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 02:24:26 pm Darin Adler wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Adam Treat wrote:
Can someone from Apple comment on whether it is possible to include the
sources to CMake
I'd really like to see this on bugs.webkit.org with a proper patch splitting
out the CMake portion. I understand that this is primarily motivated by your
desire to see EFL port build, rather than to solve the build system problem,
but this *DOES* add a new build system to the tree. I think we
I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic in those QMake files. My sense is
that it would not be trivial by any means.
Plus, I don't like the idea of a meta-meta generators. Seems way to mickey-
mouse to me.
Adam
On Friday 16 April 2010 05:10:25 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Hi,
Adam Treat (tr...@kde.org) suggested that I join this list to talk about
CMake as an option for a unified cross platform build solution. My name
is Bill Hoffman. I am the lead CMake developer. My company Kitware
created
at this task. When I do, I'll take a peek at
CMake.
Someone just needs to sit down and build something. Then we can make
an informed decision.
-eric
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Adam Treat tr...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2010 05:10:25 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Hi,
Adam Treat
On Friday 16 April 2010 06:21:39 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Sure. Having Bill's and Kitware's help will hopefully make it
easier to
produce such a demo using CMake. I pledge to help.
We can start with this:
http://trac.webkit.org
On Friday 16 April 2010 09:58:17 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Also: how hard is the dependency on being installed? Is this a solvable
problem if it turns out to be a showstopper for some folks?
It has to be installed, if this is a show stopper, then it is a show
stopper.
To be clear, it just
On Friday 09 April 2010 06:24:51 am Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Given what proportion of overall maintenance work on WebKit I done by
Apple, I don't think anyone is entitled to veto us adding a new API
Whaa? Who is talking about veto of Apple's work? Rather, I am suggesting
that it would have
On Friday 09 April 2010 02:11:33 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
There were in fact bugs opened with patches attached, and webkit-dev
was notified before any of the patches were committed afaik. However,
Indeed, but the post to webkit-dev had no link to the patches and no time was
given for anyone
On Friday 09 April 2010 04:53:31 pm Cameron Zwarich wrote:
In the past we have accepted the Chromium port despite it having a new JS
engine, new DOM bindings, an overreaching catch-all #ifdef for unrelated
changes, numerous layering violations, and seemingly unnecessary changes
or replacements
Hi,
Can someone please point to the bug report and the forum where this
development was discussed by the greater WebKit community?
Cheers,
Adam
On Thursday 08 April 2010 08:58:22 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Xan Lopez wrote:
I suppose I could wait until you land
On Thursday 08 April 2010 09:24:32 pm Darin Adler wrote:
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Can someone please point to the bug report and the forum where this
development was discussed by the greater WebKit community?
The time for that discussion is now. The forum is here.
I
I think we'd be interested to see a cross-platform version from the
perspective of the OpenVG graphics backend.
On Sunday 04 April 2010 01:32:54 am Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a parallel painting feature for WebKit (bug id: 36883).
Basically it records the painting commands on
This is not the correct forum for these types of questions.
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-help
This above is a better forum, but such basic build questions should likely be
solved with google and a bit of elbow grease.
Cheers,
Adam
On Thursday 11 March 2010 10:24:20 am
On Thursday 11 March 2010 10:50:19 am Meir Yanovich wrote:
Hello all im beginner with QtWebKit i build simple web frame that loaded
page ( server side ) and when from this page i submit data i like to catch
the response string from the server in the c++ side how can i do that ?
Again, this is
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 07:06:16 am Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I can give you a success story though: michaeln is probably the most
qualified reviewer of WebSQLDatabase code these days. He looks at most
patches that go by, and I think on average he offers more and better
comments than the
This is the incorrect forum for this kind of question. Please use webkit-help
instead.
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-help
Thanks,
Adam
On Wednesday 27 January 2010 08:15:40 am Duke5 wrote:
Hi,
I am looking to embed Webkit into an application. In order to do this, I
On Friday 22 January 2010 12:09:14 pm Darin Adler wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Christopher White wrote:
Is it possible to save the DOM resulting from the parsing of HTML / CSS
into a file and then read it back instead of re-parsing the HTML (similar
to Java object serialization).
On Thursday 07 January 2010 05:44:46 pm Kenneth Christiansen wrote:
I guess that it is not safe to assume that PopupMenuClient::hostWindow() is
always a Chrome, so would it be acceptable substituting the
Why do you say this?
Maybe add a virtual like:
virtual PlatformPopupMenu
Hi,
This list is not the correct place for this kind of question. Rather, you
should use the webkit-help mailing list:
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-help
Thanks!
Adam
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 06:21:34 pm Tomas Ramirez wrote:
Hi, I am wondering if I can use a subset of
On Thursday 10 December 2009 01:34:12 pm Peter Kasting wrote:
But if !color.green() is potentially confusing, then certainly it is just
as confusing (in fact moreso) without the surrounding color.blue() and
color.red() tests in Adam's example. Yet Adam cited consistency with
surroundings as
On Thursday 10 December 2009 03:16:51 pm Peter Kasting wrote:
Yeah, I'm not sold. But oh well. I think I was getting too irked, when
really we're just both giving our opinions on how we want the style guide
to work. There's nothing wrong with having opinions, or disagreeing.
Besides, I've
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 10:26:24 am Chris Marrin wrote:
I saw another patch get rejected today because of switch statement
indentation. We discussed this last week, and I saw a lot of support
for my proposal of indenting case labels from their switch. But the
discussion did not end in
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:03:23 pm Chris Marrin wrote:
What is wrong with keeping the current rule?
As I pointed out in the previous thread, I feel like it makes the code
harder to read, and got several responses of agreement. Also most of
the switch statements in the code currently
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 02:04:07 pm Darin Adler wrote:
On Dec 9, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Adam Treat wrote:
Ok, well FWIW I disagree that the current rule makes things hard to read
and I do not like the idea of changing it. I object on the same grounds
as the other recent styling change
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 04:02:07 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I have thought over your comments about not changing the style
guidelines at a whim.
I think you make a very good point: the most important thing about the
style guidelines is that there is one way to do things, and that's
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 07:03:51 pm Peter Kasting wrote:
But even what is trivial is a judgement call. In general people don't
disagree about issues where they believe disagreement is a waste of time.
...
And I don't. Who is right? More importantly, how will you prevent us from
On Thursday 03 December 2009 02:30:17 pm Kenneth Russell wrote:
In the WebKit WebGL implementation I've frequently encountered the
case where the else clause in a single if/else is a one-liner, and I
find it both ugly and error-prone to have to remove its braces. I'd
really like to be able to
I think this would suffer from lack of clarity. Not all embedded systems are
alike and not all will wish to be treated in the same way.
On Friday 04 December 2009 08:51:12 am Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
Hi,
it would be a great to have a macro in WebKit, which would be enabled on
embedded systems.
On Friday 04 December 2009 12:17:03 pm Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your conclusion, but I have to ask:
can you think of an example of a style change that isn't subjective and/or
something that can change as the fashion (or, more likely, the developers
working on
On Friday 04 December 2009 04:22:57 pm Dirk Pranke wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Adam Treat tr...@kde.org wrote:
I don't think we should be changing the style guide for anything besides
clarifications of currently unwritten rules. No matter how the fashion
may change or how
If i remember correctly another strike against this is SVG. I believe that
SVG uses a different set of empty clients. This would make that more difficult?
On Thursday 22 October 2009 03:29:28 pm Yong Li wrote:
Oops, even m_page is a data member.
Hm... I need to think more about it.
-Yong
On Friday 07 August 2009 05:51:57 pm Eric Seidel wrote:
We also definitely need to fix our tools to make it impossible to post a
patch w/o a ChangeLog, and impossible to post a patch that doesn't pass
check-webkit-style.
This is a bad idea. check-webkit-style still has false positives and is
On Thursday 30 July 2009 02:55:18 am Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
Hi,
any thoughts on this? I hope my qestion was clear :) I would like to pack
the static declarations into wrapper classes, so we can add platform
and/or compilation mode (debug/release) dependent functionality to all
static
On Thursday 30 July 2009 08:57:53 am Luka Napotnik wrote:
Hello.
I'm searching for the JavaScriptCore code that can access the DOM
tree. An example would be JavaScript code that changes the image
source of an IMG dom element. Any good pointer on this subject?
Greets,
Luka
This is not an
This thread is not appropriate for webkit-dev. There is a new mailing list -
webkit-help - which has been setup for threads of this nature. Please use the
other mailing list and keep webkit-dev focused on webkit development.
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-help
Cheers,
This thread is not appropriate for webkit-dev. There is a new mailing list -
webkit-help - which has been setup for threads of this nature. Please use the
other mailing list and keep webkit-dev focused on webkit development.
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-help
Cheers,
This thread is not appropriate for webkit-dev. There is a new mailing list -
webkit-help - which has been setup for threads of this nature. Please use the
other mailing list and keep webkit-dev focused on webkit development.
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-help
Cheers,
If you believe you've found a bug the correct thing to do is to post a bug on
bugs.webkit.org. See here:
http://webkit.org/quality/reporting.html
Otherwise, generic queries of this form should probably be asked on the
webkit-help mailing list:
This thread is not appropriate for webkit-dev and indeed, not appropriate for
any webkit list in general. TeaShark is only tangentially related to WebKit
and the WebKit developers have no special knowledge of this third party
product. For queries about TeaShark or any client application that
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:59:53 pm John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
I don't want to open the can of worms that is git vs other source control
systems. However given that the instructions for developing WebKit are for
svn and there already exists svn-apply/unapply scripts, I think there are
enough
On Friday 10 July 2009 06:55:59 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
* Phase 1 *
A) Make it really easy to submit a patch. Eric's bugzilla-tool is
close to being there. I'm going to help him refine this tool to the
point that submitting a patch has only one step - a single command
will make the
We have close to 100 patches that need attention in the review queue.
http://www.webkit.org/pending-review
I count five or six for the Qt port. Eight for the GTK port. Several for the
Haiku port where a decision should probably be made. And several for the ARM
Jit work and the custom memory
On Friday 19 June 2009 02:05:23 pm Drew Wilson wrote:
I was more specifically wondering if there was something about this patch
that made it not show up on the list Eric provided below. My concern is
because the bugfix came from a google.com address, it might have been
getting lumped in with
On Thursday 18 June 2009 05:39:04 pm Oliver Hunt wrote:
I reviewed quite a few last night as well. At the moment there appear
to be a large number of chromium, gtk, and qt specific patches up for
review -- it would be great if reviewers for those ports went through
them all :D
I went through
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 05:12:41 pm Jeremy Orlow wrote:
If so, why not just develop in the open?
I'm just guessing here... but probably for the same rough combination of
reasons that Google didn't develop Chromium in the open before it was publicly
announced... or for the same rough
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 06:24:32 pm Adam Treat wrote:
It would be nice if every change that is envisioned will eventually be
merged back into the official repository to be developed in the open, but
that is just not realistic given the commercial world we live in.
I would also add that in my
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 02:34:14 pm Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
... a browser engine where the javascript namespace / DOM namespace
that can be extended?
Sure.
how the heck does anyone do that with webkit? correction: how does
anyone get some object into the global namespace that
Has there been any progress with this effort? Specifically, I'm wondering if
there is a bug on bugs.webkit.org that we are using to track this task.
Cheers,
Adam
On Friday 14 November 2008 5:53:56 pm Adam Barth wrote:
Ok. I'll file a bug report at http://bugreport.apple.com/ with
several
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 1:41:50 pm Sami Kukkonen wrote:
Being new to WebKit this is confusing so I have a couple of questions:
1.Why doesn't trunk-qt-linux-release run layout tests? Is it known
and expected that hundreds of them will fail?
The buildbot for the QtWebKit port does not
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 3:12:14 pm Sami Kukkonen wrote:
OK, thanks. I'll ignore the failures for now and I can also use GTK as
my reference build since it seems to pass almost all of the layout
tests.
Actually the Qt port passes more tests right now (not by much) than the GTK
port.
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 5:07:56 am goldeneyes wrote:
Bugzilla from tr...@kde.org wrote:
Sorry, the method had moved. Here you go:
void FrameView::paintContents(GraphicsContext* p, const IntRect rect)
from
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp?rev=39858
On Monday 12 January 2009 12:25:05 pm Shariq Rizvi wrote:
I am using WebKit to piggy-back on the non-rendering phases of WebKit's
loading of a page (parsing, DOM creation, onload-time Javascript
execution), for doing some dynamic analysis of the in-memory objects that
result after these
Hi Ariya,
I will simply note that several current customers of Qt Software have yet to
migrate to Qt Extended 4.4 and are still developing plans for doing so. This
move will preclude them from benefiting from crucial improvements to the
browser engine without a correspondingly large move to a
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Paul Pedriana wrote:
I've created a working wtf/New.h file and a basic unit test for it. It
implements both of Maciej's recent proposals, which were essentially 1:
provide an allocation base class and 2: provide a global allocator.
I definitely prefer number #1.
Hi Nina,
If I understand correctly, you are loading a page in QtWebKit and then using
the QWebFrame::toHtml() method to retrieve the actual markup which is missing
closing tags.
If the html is missing *all* closing tags then this sounds like a bug in the
toHtml method. If the html is
Hi,
I do not understand how a client application should use IconDatabase to
display icons given its async nature.
It would seem that a client application should call
iconDatabase()-iconForPageURL() when it needs to display a particular icon
on startup. However, the way IconDatabase is
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Darin Adler wrote:
On May 11, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
It would seem that a client application should call iconDatabase()-
iconForPageURL() when it needs to display a particular icon on
startup. However, the way IconDatabase is written it appears
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Darin Adler wrote:
Or you could do as Safari does and call iconForPageURL twice; the
first time it's display the icon if we already have it but the
second time it's I heard you have a new icon, lets display the new
icon we now know about.
It would probably be cleaner
Hi,
I've checked and this appears to be the case in both Qt 4.3.2 and Qt 4.4
snapshot...
==7746== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 507
==7746==at 0x4022765: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==7746==by 0x5CB16C4: qMalloc(unsigned) (qglobal.cpp:1964)
==7746==
On Saturday 15 September 2007, william lee wrote:
And also the API or signal to handle before navigate to somewhere.
This is really useful, to check something before navigate. I can't find it.
It is in QWebPage:
virtual NavigationRequestResponse navigationRequested(
On Friday 14 September 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am using Webkit-QT under Windows, and I need to access to the DOM tree.
Anyone has an idea on how to do that? Is there some plan to add it to the
Webkit-QT interface?
Funny. We have been discussing such an API recently, but it
On Friday 14 September 2007, Andre-John Mas wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know whether WebKitQT has advanced far enough for us
to start seeing an alpha build of Konqueror using WebKit?
Sure. Just install the WebKitPart in playground and you'll see Konqueror
render with QtWebKit.
Cheers,
Adam
On Friday 14 September 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:21:39AM -0400, Adam Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Friday 14 September 2007, Andre-John Mas wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know whether WebKitQT has advanced far enough for us
to start seeing an alpha build
On Thursday 13 September 2007, KC Jones wrote:
The Windows Qt build is busted for me. Is this known, or have I muffed
something? The compilation failure concerns pthread.h while compiling
.\WebCore\dom\Document.cpp:
[...]\WebKit\WebCore\platform\Threading.h(33) : fatal error C1083: Cannot
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Adam Roben wrote:
On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog (25268 = 25269)
--- trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog 2007-08-28 05:59:26 UTC (rev 25268)
+++ trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog 2007-08-28 06:35:23 UTC (rev
On Monday 09 July 2007, vic burka wrote:
-Original Message-
From: vic burka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:31:47 +0400
Subject: Re: Re: [webkit-dev] Why QtLauncher doesn't load pages from
internet ?
I'm using gperf 3.0.3 - I built
You need to update your version of Qt. Qt 4.3.x is the minimum version
required.
Adam
On Wednesday 27 June 2007, Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Ubuntu 7.04.
Got up-to-date sources from svn. Did everything mentioned at
http://trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/wiki/BuildingQtOnLinux
On Monday 21 May 2007, Michael Eichhorn wrote:
Hello all,
i am a newbie with WebKit, but i tried to compiling/running the code etc.
i am interested in the Qt Launcher and i want to start it, and it
starts the window but without any content, and i get an error
message:
Hi,
Currently the build, run and debug scripts in WebKitTools/Scripts are a mashup
of scripts for the various ports. Most of the scripts are written in perl,
but a few are bash scripts. Some of them use common functions, but not all
and not all in the same way. I'd like to propose a
On Monday 16 April 2007, Sebastien Le Faou wrote:
Hi everybody,
I want to build Webkit with Qt on Windows.
Building WebKit with Qt on Windows is not supported at this moment. The
WebKit Qt developers have been talking about a plan to support this in the
future, but it remains a task for
On Monday 16 April 2007, Sebastien Le Faou wrote:
Hi Adam,
Thank you but,
I already know all of this I talked on IRC with some guys who told me
that. They told me if I want to make it work on windows I have to look at
the .pro files.
But I don't even build something with qmake.
In fact I
78 matches
Mail list logo
