Re: [Webware-discuss] Adapters

2010-07-01 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
No trick. I just want to know what people are using. On my new server, I haven't gotten mod_webkit2 to work yet. The build produces .slo and .lo files, but the Apache install only seems to successfully load .so files. I tried ModPython which worked great with one app, but becomes schizophrenic

Re: [Webware-discuss] Adapters

2010-07-01 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 01.07.2010 10:59 schrieb Chuck Esterbrook: On my new server, I haven't gotten mod_webkit2 to work yet. The build produces .slo and .lo files, but the Apache install only seems to successfully load .so files. I'm running it for years in production on SUSE Linux, the stability and

Re: [Webware-discuss] Adapters

2010-07-01 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Christoph Zwerschke c...@online.de wrote: I'm running it for years in production on SUSE Linux, the stability and performance have been outstanding. Got it also running on Windows (precompiled dlls are shipped with Webware). Same here, but I'm on a new server

Re: [Webware-discuss] Adapters

2010-07-01 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 01.07.2010 13:03 schrieb Chuck Esterbrook: Interesting. I didn't see the .libs directory at first. Is that an apxs convention or are we doing that? Normally dot files are meant to be semi-hidden, but I don't see why these files would be. It's apxs doing that. The rationale is probably that

Re: [Webware-discuss] Adapters

2010-07-01 Thread Roger Haase
I am running the WSGI adapter with 1.1b1 on Ubuntu 10.04 and also using it on a W/7 test system. Works well for me. Roger Haase --- On Wed, 6/30/10, Chuck Esterbrook chuck.esterbr...@gmail.com wrote: From: Chuck Esterbrook chuck.esterbr...@gmail.com Subject: [Webware-discuss] Adapters To: