Hello,
As you may have noticed, Roan, Krinkle and me have started to more
tightly integrate image licensing within MediaWiki. Our aim is to
create a system where it should be easy to obtain the basic copyright
information of an image in a machine readable format, as well as
querying images with
For those of you who didn't see bug 26791, our use of JSMin has been
found to conflict with our GPL license. After assessing other options (
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26791#c8 ) Roan and I
decided to try and use the minification from JavaScriptPacker, but not
its overly
On 20 January 2011 22:13, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For those of you who didn't see bug 26791, our use of JSMin has been
found to conflict with our GPL license.
On behalf of all aspiring Dark Lords, may I thank the Wikimedia
Foundation for protecting our freedom to use
Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
Hello,
As you may have noticed, Roan, Krinkle and me have started to more
tightly integrate image licensing within MediaWiki. Our aim is to
create a system where it should be easy to obtain the basic copyright
information of an image in a machine readable format, as
Trevor Parscal (2011-01-20 23:13):
For those of you who didn't see bug 26791, our use of JSMin has been
found to conflict with our GPL license. After assessing other options (
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26791#c8 ) Roan and I
decided to try and use the minification from
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:33 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 January 2011 22:13, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For those of you who didn't see bug 26791, our use of JSMin has been
found to conflict with our GPL license.
On behalf of all aspiring Dark Lords,
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
For those of you who didn't see bug 26791, our use of JSMin has been
found to conflict with our GPL license.
Thank you for removing JSMin! Thou shall use mediawiki for evil! ;)
-Katie (@aude)
- Trevor (and
2011/1/21 Maciej Jaros e...@wp.pl:
Yes, I know I'm stubborn, but 6 bytes (0.6%)? Seriously? Doesn't seem
convincing to me and seems like it could at least use
$wgResourceLoaderMinifyJSHorizontalSpace (even if true by default).
Trevor probably didn't choose a very good test case. He also tested
Roan Kattouw (2011-01-21 00:50):
2011/1/21 Maciej Jarose...@wp.pl:
Yes, I know I'm stubborn, but 6 bytes (0.6%)? Seriously? Doesn't seem
convincing to me and seems like it could at least use
$wgResourceLoaderMinifyJSHorizontalSpace (even if true by default).
Trevor probably didn't choose a
On 21/01/11 09:13, Trevor Parscal wrote:
For those of you who didn't see bug 26791, our use of JSMin has been
found to conflict with our GPL license.
You're talking about the good not evil joke clause?
-- Tim Starling
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Joke or not, it's in there, and it's a violation of the GPL.
- Trevor
On 1/20/11 5:44 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
On 21/01/11 09:13, Trevor Parscal wrote:
For those of you who didn't see bug 26791, our use of JSMin has been
found to conflict with our GPL license.
You're talking about the good
2011/1/21 Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org:
Joke or not, it's in there, and it's a violation of the GPL.
Plus the alternative is better anyway.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
C == Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com writes:
C I don't follow release notes, I'm subscribed to mediawiki-cvs.
C It's way more informative.
Ah, http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.org.wikimedia.mediawiki.cvs
99 times overload for me though.
___
Wikitech-l
On 01/20/2011 05:00 PM, Platonides wrote:
I would have probably gone by the page_props route, passing the metadata
from the wikitext to the tables via a parser function.
I would also say its probably best to pass metadata from the wikitext to
the tables via a parser function. Similar to
As mentioned in the bug, it would be nice to have configurable support
for the closure-compiler as well ;) ( I assume Apache licence is
compatible? )
Has anyone done any tests to see if there are any compatibility issues
with SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS with a google closure minification hook?
On 21/01/11 12:46, Trevor Parscal wrote:
Joke or not, it's in there, and it's a violation of the GPL.
Did you try emailing the author and asking for a dual license?
On 21/01/11 12:58, Roan Kattouw wrote:
Plus the alternative is better anyway.
Sure, but Trevor is claiming that he wrote it
iirc there are some issues with the Apache license in GPLv2. GPLv3
however is fine with the Apache license.
As for dropping JSMin... I never really liked Crockford anyways, nor
JSMin... so I don't really have any problem. I also don't like the idea
of maintaining what's essentially a local
17 matches
Mail list logo
