It makes sense to me as well ;-)
fulvio
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: venerdì 7 gennaio 2005 20.48
To: winpcap-users@winpcap.polito.it
Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] WinPcap identified as spyware by Microsoft
AntiSpyware Beta 1
Read again the part of your email, below: could the evil open
source term have anything to do with it ?!? I have a couple of other
things running on a W2K box, and all happened to be open source or
freeware, coincidentally, and some were immediately identifed as
potentially malicious by the M$
Now - if Microsoft was to develop winpcap, and sell it ... hmm ...
that would probably make it safer, by definition (Microsoft =
security, as we all know). ;
That said, the security warning is not 100% fake ; if a malicious program
gets running on your machine, the fact that it can snoop
: [WinPcap-users] WinPcap identified as spyware by Microsoft
AntiSpyware Beta 1
Now - if Microsoft was to develop winpcap, and sell it ... hmm ...
that would probably make it safer, by definition (Microsoft =
security, as we all know). ;
That said, the security warning is not 100% fake
Hi.
Unfortunately, there are some spyware (cain, if I remember well) which are
using WinPcap for performing their job.
Hence, the alarm that comes from Microsoft is not so wrong.
However, I feel there's nothing to do against this problem. Unless
convincing who is developing spyware not to use
