From: berry
Most of us have developped application using DOM which maybe
will not be
valid with the new standard especially with XHTML 2.0 and DOM3.
So? Nobody will be forcing you to switch your site to XHTML 2.0 or
any other technology. The whole point of having DOCTYPEs is to identify
- I doubt XHTML 2/DOM 3 will hit the main stream for a number of years
(at least 5). So I wouldn't start worrying about it now.
- I don't think XHTML 2/DOM 3 have be designed with developers in
mind. These guys are not thinking about our immediate needs - they are
thinking about the direction of
Interesting read:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/20/accessibility_underclass/
Companies and public bodies are still failing to take accessibility
into account when designing their websites, despite the risk of legal
action under the UK's disability discrimination laws
--
Regards,
Amit
I am on holiday !!
Back on the 10th of Jan.
Contact Adrienne Foley for urgent stuff.
__
This message contains information, which is confidential and may be subject to
legal privilege.
If
Well,
You can start reading
http://thetaoofwebdesign.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/2004/10/
color_schemes_g.html and
http://thetaoofwebdesign.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/2004/08/
update_how_to_c.html to help you out with the colors.
Then pick a pencil and start drawing... them put that in CSS / XHTML
Anthony,
You have 120 errors on that page. Most of them are br errors missing their
end tag.
A simple search and replace will get you down to about 20 errors. (maybe
less I can't be bothered wading through them all.)
Try in your favourite editor:
Find: br
Replace With: br /
Even note pad has
Validates???
Have I got the wrong url or something. I just checked www.dotradio.uni.cc
and it still has 120 errors? Did I miss something?
Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of haggis
Sent: Wednesday, 22 December 2004 12:34 PM
Anthony,
Do not get discouraged. Designing semantically correct, accessible,
and valid sites is not easy. Transitioning to standards compliant
design is a long frustrating road, but it is well worth the pain.
There are many that can forget the journey that we all traveled to get
where we are
Patrick-
Nice! This will help me perfectly with figuring out some seasonal tints for
my various menu levels.
Ron Pringle
Web Developer
MIS, City of Aurora
630-892-8811 x3359
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aurora-il.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
In case anyone missed it, http://www.wire-man.com/paletteman/ is nice
too.
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
On Dec 22, 2004, at 10:28 AM, Pringle, Ron wrote:
Patrick-
Nice! This will help me perfectly with figuring out some seasonal
tints for
my
That site works fine in IE6, but in my FF 1.0 on WinXP SP2, instructions
don't appear, etc. Doesn't work in FF, in other words.
It's awesome, but you have to use it with IE.
Leslie
In case anyone missed it, http://www.wire-man.com/paletteman/ is nice
too.
Tom
Hi
all
we are
going out of the bounds of web standards with the color schemer
references.
So,
I'll throw my two cents in and tip the see saw way off
balance.
Using
colorschemer, color palette mambo jambo, color my site beautiful, or any
other color scheme generator is like using
a
I am still having some problems getting all of my floats working in Opera.
I just added a little search feature to the left side of our web site
http://www.csatravelprotection.com/csa/jsp/index.jsp
It looks fine in IE WIN and FF. In Opera, the go button drops down below the
search area.
To avoid
Ted,
Thanks so much for the recommendation on the book. This is the kind of
information I was really
hoping to obtain from this list. Being a developer and not a designer I'm
trying to develop some
form of eye for style not to mention layout, type, color etc.
I'll add your book recommendation
Opera7 doesn't allow fieldsets to float. Bug.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
The url given has a valid html4 button, but the doctype of the page itself
is xhtml 1.0 transitional. The markup is nothing like xhtml, but the
validator keeps trying to validate it as xhtml because the doctype says
so. If you cant change your markup to xhtml, it would be easier to change
Ted,
I wholly agree with you but what
good is color theory if you cant pick them out? In my case Im
severely colorblind, and have to rely on programs (I use ColorSuite for Hexachrome
by Pantone) to find complementary colors. Its not that I cant,
or dont understand color theory its just
Flipping this on its ear: are there any tools to help those with good colour
perception to preview what a design might look like to those who are colour
blind. I know certain schemers do this, but I'm thinking more for reviewing
finished products.
Sadly my eyes didn't come with a colour blindness
Ryan Reynolds wrote:
Flipping this on its ear: are there any tools to help those with good colour
perception to preview what a design might look like to those who are colour
blind.
you may want to give http://colorfilter.wickline.org/ a go. It does a
great job of converting text, bgcolors, and
Hi
Whilst we're all fully aware of IE6's Quirks-mode switching according to
Doctype, is there any additional information available?
The MSDN page
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/ie/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnie60/html/cssenhancements.asp)
just mentions the CSS2 fixes when using an xhtml DTD
David R wrote:
But which XHTML dtd? I noticed that in some cases IE6 doesn't render
pages correctly when the XHTML 1.1 DTD is used, or if you include the
?xml version=1.0 header before the DTD (and I've noticed that G3
browsers (PocketIE, IE3.02, etc..) render the ?xml header with the
body
Ryan,
The AIS Web Accessibility Toolbar is great for that - see your site as
greyscale, colour blindness, glaucoma, all sorts.. and that's only one small
part of it.
http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/toolbar/index.html
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G'day
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Never include the ?xml declaration. This throws IE into quirks mode
right
away.
If you use server side scripting (ASP, PHP or whatever - not going into
scripting detail as that's off topic) to serve an xhtml document in
text/html or application/xhtml+xml as
Hi,
I'm trying to represent the path as an unordered list, e.g.
Home Level One Level Two Level Three etc.
ul
liHome/li
liLevel One/li
liLevel Two/li
liLevel Three/li
lietc./li
/ul
However in situations where the path is extremely long the list will not
wrap and breaks my layout,
24 matches
Mail list logo
