On Thu, 12 May 2005 18:42:07 +0100, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I used something similar on this site: http://www.csatravelprotection.com
I don't see anything that would require tons of CSS on that page (checked
FF nightly and Opera 8.01).
Sub-navigation doesn't even change when
On Thu, 12 May 2005 21:25:36 +0100, Stevio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a page that works ok using an IFrame to load some content from
another web site into this frame.
The page is XHTML 1.0 Transitional compatible using an IFrame. To make
it XHTML 1.0 Strict compatible, I would need to
Hi,
i made a new column layout generator but instead of 3 columns
(http://www.neuroticweb.com/recursos/3-columns-layout/) for 2.
http://www.neuroticweb.com/recursos/2-columns-layout/
It would be pleasant any suggestion or comment.
--
Carlos Rincn Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neurotic, SCP -
Neerav schrieb:
Theoretical example 1: we used to design for 5.x browsers but recently
stopped doing so without charging clients an extra XX%
That is what we do now. I add an import filter (and document it) so that
IE 4.0-5.0/Win and IE4.0-5.x/Mac and NN 4.x ignore imported styles:
@import'styles.css';
http://www.dithered.com/css_filters/css_only/import_single_quotes_no_space.html
Agree, I'm lately converting to doing it the same way (as you never know
when the brokem wannabe-css-rendering makes the site unusable, so rather
serve plain document to them).
--
Jan Brasna
Here's forum thread about it:
http://my.opera.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=91018
and here is pretty nice comparison of latest builds:
http://my.opera.com/forums/attachment.php?postid=929573
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion
On Fri, 13 May 2005 10:20:59 -0400, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and here is pretty nice comparison of latest builds:
http://my.opera.com/forums/attachment.php?postid=929573
:-)
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
--
www.browsehappy.com
www.opera.com
Using
Hi Kornel
True, that older site didn't require a lot of css. I did, however use the
body class or id, I can't remember to trigger the sub nav to open.
I've never liked that navigation layout. It was clumsy in cross-browsers. If
I still worked there, I'd re-do it.
I'll send them a note about the
On 5/12/05, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello.
I was looking over the list navigation article at
http://www.complexspiral.com/events/archive/2003/seybold/cssnav.html
lia href=index.html id=homeWidgetCo Home/a/li
what is the id=home used for in this href?
theres no css rule for
Sorry, got waylaid on a few other pressing problems. This answer makes
complete sense and I feel like a dummy for missing it altogether!
Thanks to everyone on the list for your help.
w
Wayne Godfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 12, 2005, at 11:11 PM, Ben Crothers wrote:
Hi Wayne,
Looks like it's
Hi all,
Sorry if this is slightly OT.
I¹m starting a website for a hotel and they would like to implement some
kind of on-line reservation system with possible credit card payments. Since
I have never done something like this before, are there any good (commercial
or not) PHP-solutions available
Since the hotel is likely to have specific requirements with regard to
what types of data they need to capture, it's advisable that you hire
a web developer than can write software that meets those requirements.
Ideally you would hire a developer with experience in the travel
industry, since
Hi,
I just created my online resume using CSS and strict XHTML. I encountered a couple of problems which I
couldn't figure out why.
First is to print a friendly version, I added print.css which should hide the picture and footer.
But it worked only on IE (i am using 6) and I tested it with
Yeah WAY OT,
Please respond to Erwin off list.
This list only covers web standards, if the brief was bigger than that it
would explode and become unusable. There are no web standards involved in
server-side technologies and tasks like card processing.
We have a CMS list to discuss the output of
On 14 May 2005, at 8:02 AM, Lily Miu wrote:
Second is the name anchor I placed at the bottom of the page, it also
worked only on IE. For other browsers,
the anchor was going to the very bottom of the page instead of going
up.
Your 'top' link is contained within a div with id='top':
div id=top
Testing for Smartphones PDAs
So, you were won over to the 'standards compliancy' argument. You now build
your pages to HTML standards and sleep soundly in the knowledge that your work
is accessible and device-independent.
Ok, the reality isn't quite that easy, but it's a good place to start.
On 5/13/05, NickGleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 May 2005, at 8:02 AM, Lily Miu wrote:Second is the name anchor I placed at the bottom of the page, it also worked only on IE. For other browsers,the anchor was going to the very bottom of the page instead of going
up.Your 'top' link is
On 5/14/05, Lily Miu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? I believe is needed in order for
XHTML to be validated.
Sorry Lily, this isn't actually helping with your print stylesheet
problem, but I thought I'd step in and do some CSS Myth-Busting (TM).
For a start,
On 14 May 2005, at 7:02 am, Lily Miu wrote:
First is to print a friendly version, I added print.css which should
hide
the picture and footer.
But it worked only on IE (i am using 6) and I tested it with Firefox,
Opera
and NN, all of them were not working.
[...]
Here's the link to the page.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
20 matches
Mail list logo
