Me, personally, I wouldn't use a CMS that produced mark-up like that.
Especially not when I know there are others out there that will do a
better job (haven't explored Powerfront too closely to find out whether
it's possible to alter the output mark-up).
I'd have to ask though: why are you
Please consider that a cms is a tool too allow people to add there own
content. So the inline styling may in fact be added by the end user.
For the example site linked to - http://www.goodshepvic.org.au/ - I didn't
even get as far down to what might've been user entered content.
Incomplete
And now you don't even need to buy Sitepoint reference material:
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:50:59 +1000, Paul McCann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also reccomend the Sitepoint books. Work well as a reference
when your working too, or just forgot something
Plenty of references here:
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2006/11/11/css-based-forms-modern-solutions/
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:01:26 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ,
Could anyone tell me which is the best way to build a form without
tables in w3c standards.
I would really appreciate
the flaw in this approach is the potential for adding divs for styling
purposes only which is hardly ever necessary.
I'm not saying that at all. Every layout is going to have containers; use
the ones you've already got. Adding styles for every element has the
potential for 'bloating' your
I'd say the only time you need to use paragraphs inside list items is when
a list item's content is made up of more than one paragraph.
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:13:54 +1000, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Taco,
In the case of the example you provided I'd say definitely no need for
If you have two paragraphs you might want to reconsider the use of a
list.
I don't agree. Consider as an example a 'list' of services - it may take
more than one paragraph to adequately describe each service, but it is
still a list.
--
Tyssen Design
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph:
If the lists have a number of levels like
Services
Web Site Development
Graphics
SEO and
more
About Us
Me
You
Someone else
I'm not talking about presenting a list of links; I'm talking about
presenting the actual content on a page. From your example above, it's
Assign the paragraph style to a HTML tag that is surrounding all other
tags?
If so, I would not feel comfortable with that.
Why not? If this is your HTML:
div class=content
psome text/p
ul
lisome text/li
/ul
/div
This
.content {
color: red;
font-size: 1em;
line-height: 1.5
}
makes more
If you apply the style to the container, then you don't need to assign
styles individually to different elements (except where you want them to
be different).
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:22:52 +1000, Taco Fleur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim,
What I mean by duplicate style is that if I
Also is their a preference in web standards for using PHP includes or
something like SSI?
SSI stands for server side include which is essentially what a PHP include
is. The only difference is the syntax used to call the include.
--
Tyssen Design
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07)
You don't need a longdesc in that example because you're already linking
to it by an anchor.
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:34:09 +1000, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's the link to the example:
http://studiokdd.com/sandbox/abstract-christian-art-new-testament.html
i have the jesus and
IE6 doesn't respect the *:hover pseudo selector if I remember
rightly... It only supports it for anchors, e.g a:hover
You may have to look at a small bit of javascript to 'activate' this
behavior.
No, because he's using one of Stu Nicholl's js-free menus. The trade off
is a lot of IE
It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too:
http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible (the Zeldman
lemur cracked me up completely)
That's awesome!
We can opt to save our energy for standards-based browsers and not
bother learning new versions of IE.
e.g. Web Standards Group (WSG) the WSG wouldn't benefit from the
acronym element.
No, I believe you only then need to use the acronym or abbr tag for the
first instance of it following where it appears in brackets on any one
page (ie at the start of a new page, you'd expand the
A textpattern form with inline styles, only gets loaded once and when
a change is made to it every page on the site is globally updated.
You may only have one file to edit, but what gets sent to the browser is
still a different page for each entry with the inline styles needing to be
Seems like someone is listening! The color buttons is gone
No they're not. Unless you're referring to something different.
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
***
List Guidelines:
Yeah, that's right. I can still see them and they still change the colour
of the page.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:31:49 +1000, Kim Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well they are on my computer! (we're talking about the 4 colored buttons
that changed the colors of the page... right?)
John Faulds
Oh come on, let's not be so blinkered that we can't appreciate really
good work in most areas!
Felix isn't the only one who has a number of issues with the new design
and for entirely different reasons -
http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/bbc_homepage_redesign/
I'd have to
First, it requests the Commission to obligate Microsoft to unbundle
Internet Explorer from Windows and/or carry alternative browsers
pre-installed on the desktop.
I can't see that flying. Is anyone going to ask Apple to stop shipping
their OS with Safari?
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:05:11
Delivering their OSes with half a dozen pre-installed standard-compliant
alternatives to IE/win isn't a
technical problem, so why not?
I'm no lawyer and I'm also no MS fanboy, but I think 'why?' is as equally
a valid question as 'why not?'.
My latest computer with Vista came pre-intalled
but their os should be able to run other optional packages that the
customer chooses.
Out of all the applications Gav I mentioned previously, all the
alternatives are easily installed on Windows (including Vista), and that's
certainly the case for other browsers, so I don't really see
It should be: !-- ... -- (no 2nd !).
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:40:52 +1000, Hayden's Harness Attachment
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!-- ... --!
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
***
I'd think a little bit more about what you want your CMS to do before
jumping in with Joomla. I've only given it a cursory look over before
because I wasn't that impressed particularly by the sort of templating it
uses and the code it outputs. If your client just wants to edit pages
I have to mark up a club constitution where all the paragraphs are
numbered but there are also headings that are supposed to relate to
paragraphs, e.g.:
Heading 1
1. Paragraph goes here
2. Paragraph goes here
3. Paragraph goes here
Heading 2
4. Paragraph goes here
5. Paragraph goes
want to read the full discussion.
John Faulds wrote:
I have to mark up a club constitution where all the paragraphs are
numbered but there are also headings that are supposed to relate to
paragraphs, e.g.:
Heading 1
1. Paragraph goes here
2. Paragraph goes here
3. Paragraph goes here
Hi Georg,
Yep, that did it. It looks like it was the % padding causing the problem.
Huge thanks for the time and effort you spent helping me out on this one!
Cheers
John
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:56:44 +1000, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Faulds wrote:
I appreciate all your
The pixel-based min/max version is a much easier solution then, but
yours needs adjustments. The 4% missing with a fluid state of 96% width,
is not identical to the 18px you have between attack and max-width
values, and same goes for the 'min-width' part. It is percentage of the
body-width you're
The purpose of max-width loses if it can't overruled the ems behavior.
It's not a case of max-width overruling ems. Ems is related to font-size
which is why it's used for fluid/elastic layouts - it's *supposed* to
increase as you increase the text size. If you don't want your layout to
:
John Faulds wrote:
Could you show me what you've got in your corrected copy because I'm
unsure which values I'm supposed to be tuning?
Ok, here's a smooth-working version...
* html #wrap {
width: 95%;
width:expression(((document.compatMode
document.compatMode=='CSS1Compat
Hi
I've got a page shift happening when you hover over certain elements in
the right column on this page:
http://www.gbjt.org.au/competitions/enrolment/
It happens when you hover over the links in the top box and over any of
the form inputs, but not on the links in the two smaller boxes.
Hi Georg,
It's at: http://www.gbjt.org.au/css/IE.css
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:08:11 +1000, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Faulds wrote:
I've got a page shift happening when you hover over certain elements in
the right column on this page:
http://www.gbjt.org.au
1: the large shifting is easiest solved by deleting all R:P styles on
sidebar...
#sidebar {
position: relative; -- delete
z-index: 200; -- delete
}
I had that there because the top link in the sidebar seems to get
partially obscured by the transparent PNG of the ball. I'm sure it was
Here's a recent one that might prove useful:
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/redesigning_ebay_registration/
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:55:46 +1000, Howard Kim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this question is appropriate for this list. I'm doing some
research on best practices for
*Sometimes* I find this works:
#parent {overflow: auto;}
You need to combine that with a width for it to work in IE. You might also
find in some situations that you need to use oveflow: hidden as auto will
create scrollbars.
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb:
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/sites/evolved/sax/
I can't figure out why the dropdowns fall behind the content below them.
Can anybody see what I'm obviously missing? :?
Cheers
John
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
I've z-indexed just about everything on the page to no avail so far.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:35:31 +1000, Chris Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Faulds wrote:
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/sites/evolved/sax/
I can't figure out why the dropdowns fall behind the content below them.
Can
#header {
position: relative;
z-index: 999;
}
I've z-indexed just about everything on the page to no avail so far.
Right, well obviously I hadn't. I could've sworn I'd done that for #header
as well. Oh well, thanks for the extra sets of eyes guys! :)
--
Tyssen Design
That's weird, it's working today. :?
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:57:05 +1000, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp
OK, this is obviously not an isolated occurrence anymore. I've tried to
look at your site 3
OK, this is obviously not an isolated occurrence anymore. I've tried to
look at your site 3 times now in the last couple of weeks Thierry and can
never get it to load.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:52:32 +1000, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd appreciate any comments that would
This might prove useful - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/guide-to-hidden-text
My understanding is that yes, SEs do view some use of CSS dubiously, but
it's also been my understanding that it only applies to inline CSS (not
external stylesheets) and as an added safety measure, you can always add
whisperI actually quite like it./whisper
I thought it was pretty cool too. A bit of experimentation shows that
there's actually been a fair bit of work put into font-previewing
interface. Definitely nowhere near the worst site I've seen recently.
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
:
John Faulds wrote:
OK, this is obviously not an isolated occurrence anymore. I've tried to
look at your site 3 times now in the last couple of weeks Thierry and
can never get it to load.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:52:32 +1000, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
mac
http://www.ourtype.be/
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:57:02 +1000, Travis D. Falls
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I missed the URL for this. can someone send it out again? I want to see
what has everyone in a tizzy. J
travis
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris
So the question is still open for me, and I'm curious; what is your
source of information for thinking that the big G only looks at inline
CSS?
It was a couple of years ago that I came across articles that suggested
this (I can't remember if anyone provided hard evidence to back it up). So
Been working on this site in the last 2 days, I find that I am getting
so annoyed by the surprise' everytime the hover pops up. There is no
way to miss it everytime I move the cursor to the top.
Leaving aside considerations as to whether you should actually be
bothering after the client
If the images are in the CSS, then there's no need for alt attributes.
Conversely, if you believe an image should have alt text, then it
shouldn't be in the CSS as a bg-image.
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:20:23 +1000, Simon Cockayne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again...
Whoops...butterfingers
I've managed to avoid doing this for while, but I'm doing a CMS job
and the content in a floated group of LI's is going to be differeing
heights. They need to wrap onto a new line when they hit the right
edge of the container, causing layout problems.
Would need to see what you have at the
Here's a list of free screenreaders:
http://access.benjaminhawkeslewis.com/free-screen-readers.html
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:35:13 +1000, Simon Cockayne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What screen reader(s) should one test with?
Seemingly WSG is keen on the development of web sites that are
Remember that a screen reader user has no idea how long a page is
until they get to the end. They may be one line from the end, yet still
have no idea what percentage is left.
I'd have thought that would be a fairly useful feature to have. I often
judge whether I'm going to read something
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/accessible-forms1.html
With your labels set to display: block, you don't realy need the extra
br at the end of each one. ;)
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
I use both Wordpress and Expression Engine and don't find WP any less
capable of outputting exactly what you put into it than EE. The only time
I find you ever have to edit core WP files is if you're using the inbuilt
sidebar widgets functionality; otherwise it's not an issue.
On Wed, 12
Have you looked at Google Analytics?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:44 +1000, Paul Hempsall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual community
survey for good measure).
I'm
I can download them OK and am running both hardware and software firewall
with Avast antivirus.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:24:08 +1000, Bob Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Some users have complained that when they go to this page
http://www.fifeweb.org/wp/lib/lib_current.html
and try to
We're probably going to need to see your code and/or a link to the page to
be able to make any reasonable comment.
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:28:57 +1000, minim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all - I've been set what I believe to be an impossible challenge,
but before I admit defeat I thought I
That's a shame because I really need stunning examples of accessible,
standards-compliant design to show our clients what is possible.
Is there nothing on Accessites.org that makes the grade?
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
Web Standards, Accessibility and Usability needs to be put right at the
top of the list, way before design.
I won't argue with that but all of those things are generally a harder
sell to a client than the more superficial aspects of a project like the
graphic design.
--
Tyssen Design
I've only used Expression Engine and Wordpress but they'll output whatever
HTML you put into your templates so how standards-friendly is entirely up
to the user and there is no limitations imposed by the CMS.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:01:32 +1000, Rick Lecoat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi;
Most HTML tags get written into your template by you. There's only a few
functions I can think of that output tags as well as a content and most of
the time, it's perfectly valid HTML.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:24:36 +1000, Rick Lecoat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 13/8/07 (11:57) John said:
Stuff jumping around like that in IE usually indicates a hasLayout issue.
An easy way to test is to do * { height: 1% }; it'll probably do strange
things to the layout, but if it stops the jumping, you know you then only
have to narrow it down to the offending element.
And no, the
, Jermayn Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
when i test it with the 1% height, the jumping stops like u said but how
do
I test it for what the problem is??
sorry if this sounds a dumb question
On 8/9/07, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuff jumping around like that in IE usually
So which emulators (simulators) are correct?
They probably all are but just as Opera renders differently from IE6 on a
desktop, Opera Mini (or Mobile) renders differently from other mobile
browsers. In fact, there's more difference among mobile browsers than
there is desktop browsers and
The only site I've done with a handheld stylesheet is:
http://www.thiesskentz.com.au/
As far as testing goes, not sure how reliable DW's previews would be
considering how bad their design view is.
Other testing options include:
http://www.operamini.com/demo/
The obvious different is that there are two Thiess Kents logo, one
big, one small, the small one overlapping the Engineers
Constructors
Actually, that was an oversight on my part. It's fixed now. Thanks!
You can also get an idea of what your site will looked like on handhelds
using Opera
It's being affected by the float on #nav so you need to clear the content
that comes after it correctly.
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:21:29 +1000, Lyn Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning
http://www.plecomadness.com/index.html
Can someone tell me why my background image on
Text-shadow's part of the CSS3 spec and not CSS 2.1 isn't it? So if you're
validating against CSS 2.1, you'll get an error.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:03:46 +1000, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here:
Value Error : text-shadow
In the past, I've set the company name or logo in an h2,
reserving the h1 for the actual page heading.
That'll only work if the page heading actually comes before the company
name, otherwise your heading hierarchy is broken.
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb:
We need to see more of your code or a link to your page but I suspect your
container probably contains floated content and you haven't cleared your
floats properly.
I have to ask though, if your image is just creating black borders on
either side of the container, why don't you use borders
background images
often,
and they usually aren't as simple as a border.
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Faulds
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 7:00 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Container Background
By posting to the Web Standards Group mailing list (with the subject
line, Mac test please).
Well, as you mentioned it: I downloaded Safari for Windows today and
didn't have any problem with it except that my own site looks completely
screwed in it. It didn't look like that last time I
Hi Philippe,
Yeah, and, you load stylesheets via xml PI. Safari/WebKit doesn't
recognise media types in that case. It applies all your stylesheets.
Yep, that was it. Thanks for that. But I'm curious why it's only a problem
in v3 and not earlier versions.
--
Tyssen Design
Just left a comment about this on 456 Berea St - seems to be working OK
for me although other Windows users seem to find it pretty much unusable.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:24 +1000, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This will be interesting...
Safari 3 Public Beta:
style type=text/css
#every_page #index, #every_page #index:hover { color: #4F; background:
#003173; cursor: default;}
/style
should do it (you're also missing the # from index:hover).
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:40:35 +1000, JS Bracher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
#every_page
--
Tyssen
Well if we're going to talk about 'pedanticness' it has to be pointed out
that there's no such word; the word you're looking for is 'pedantry'.
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:54:04 +1000, Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ben and others,
Here is my own bit of pedanticness...
--
Hi Tee,
I wrote something about styling legends a while ago which might help:
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/articles/css/legends-of-style/
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:12:59 +1000, Tee G. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a form layout that utilize fieldset and legend and I
It probably shouldn't be used for pairing as you describe, but rather a
group of inputs that all share some common-ground. In my case I use them
to contain groups of required versus non-required inputs as well as the
type of information sought (contact info, etc.).
Sorry to bring this up
I've not had that much experience with DW/Contribute, but I know they've
both got pretty ordinary CSS support which means in a lot of cases you
have to create separate Design Time Stylesheets just to get your layout to
look presentable in Contribute.
On Thu, 31 May 2007 09:50:33 +1000,
Additionally, code redundancy is also a problem when it comes to
templates (though, some would say this is a feature of EE)
I've not found that so far. Once you get your head around the way you can
embed templates in other templates, it's just like using includes.
--
Tyssen Design
I liked what I saw of Silverstripe but unfortunately it has a certain PHP
memory limit requirement which my web host wasn't willing to change so it
ruled it out for me unless I wanted to change hosts.
On Tue, 29 May 2007 08:50:15 +1000, Robin Gorry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have head
But sometimes at least one phone number might be required but others are
optional (e.g. mobile, home, fax etc) - doesn't seem as logical to split
your phone number fields up into different groupings.
On Mon, 28 May 2007 10:26:31 +1000, Mike at Green-Beast.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good. Only comment I'd make is about your skills and their ratings:
at the moment that information is only really of value to people already
in the web dev game and not really useful to anyone who doesn't know
anything about web development but who wants a website done. If you're not
You could probably use this techique:
http://alistapart.com/articles/sprites
On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:44:15 +1000, Felisimina Jom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone
We are trying to put together a map of Australia where the states appear
on hover and are clickable.
As I understand
Surely Wordpress (can't speak for Textpattern) will output whatever you
put into your templates, including doctype?
On Fri, 25 May 2007 13:55:47 +1000, David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Following up on Lisa McLaughlin's recent query about blogging software,
I wonder if anyone can
When you say you've been looking to no avail, what have you looked at and
why were they no good?
On Thu, 24 May 2007 08:41:04 +1000, Lisa B McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Calling all blog wizards!
I need a stand alone blogging software that I can insert into a client's
website so
There was a discussion on this on Roger Johansson's site last year:
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200608/selecting_country_names_in_forms/
On Thu, 24 May 2007 08:58:16 +1000, Sarah Peeke (XERT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Just wondering what you think about form usability
I use Fireworks.
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:22:42 +1000, Douglas Reith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Just a quick one - what do people most commonly mock up web site designs
in? (Photoshop?)
Also, if possible, Linux and GPL or similar would be great!!
Cheers,
Doug
--
Tyssen Design
Does it even have that relationship? Does it matter to anybody other
than some twonk from merchandising whether the blue sweater comes before
the red dress? If a list is to be used (and I don't disagree with the
use of a list in this case) then it seems to me that an unordered list
should
I'm not seeing the problems as you describe - the content appears in the
same place in FF IE6 on both pages. There are couple of other problems
in IE6 though: on the form page, your textareas are aligned right and not
with the text above them and on the calendar page, none of the links in
/07 11:05 AM, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not seeing the problems as you describe - the content appears in
the
same place in FF IE6 on both pages. There are couple of other
problems
in IE6 though: on the form page, your textareas are aligned right and
not
with the text above them
1. In the lefthand nav I would have liked to have some of the 2nd level
Œlink¹s not links. But my code is up the creek and I can¹t make them
line up
or be the same font size unless they¹re all links. Any clues on what I¹m
doing wrong here?
Are these IE problems? If so, it's because the
Gardner-Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/5/07 12:30 PM, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Are these IE problems? If so, it's because the anchors are set to
display
block which causes a bug in IE which can be reset by also giving the
anchors a dimension.
No I'm looking
issue? I haven't come across that before ...
- susie
On 11/5/07 1:27 PM, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't help you with your Mac problems, I can only tell you what I see in
Windows (and the suggested fixes will still apply), but for the footer
problem, remove */ from just above
What markup do you favor for a headline-tagline pair? (The second
element could be a tagline or a byline.)
h1Thundering Pigs/h1
citea blog by Bob/cite
No, cite is for citations.
A question on cite: is this an appropriate usage?
pThe SitePoint book citeBuild Your Own Web
You might find the ideas on the following link interesting:
http://www.pearsonified.com/2007/04/definitive-guide-to-semantic-markup.php
Not a particularly good article in my opinion. He recommends serving site
taglines in H2s and then post titles in H1s which in most cases would mean
the H2
If the content in the main body of the page starts with a H1, why
shouldn't the sidebar content start with a H2? And I've seen sites where
the sidebar isn't just an aside - both columns present information of
equal weighting. The point is, you can't make blanket statements about
what the
Doesn't More details on product x mean exactly the same thing as Click
here for more details on product x if the whole line is a link? Surely
people recognise links enough that they don't need to be told to click
every single one?
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:10:12 +1000, James Leslie
[EMAIL
Basically if I'm looking to change something in the main nav, I look in
mainnav.css, if I'm altering a header for a table in our content area, I
look in contentTables.css etc, etc.
Or if you've got Firebug, right-click on an element, 'Inspect element' and
it tells you exactly what line
a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say/a
Same text - different destinations.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:43:51 +1000, Designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say/a
--
Tyssen Design
Have you tried:
#yourDiv {
background-image: none;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='yourImage.png',sizingMethod='scale');
}
I've used that before for a PNG shadow that runs down the sides of a site.
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:48:16 +1000, Keryx Web
This looks like it fixes it:
#links ul ul a { height: 1% }
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:53:49 +1000, Christian Fagan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I have a baffling issue with a drop down list in IE6.
The page is here: http://www.fagandesign.com.au/PROJECTS/MEC/index.html
The CSS is
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
