Lee Wrote:
The Semantic web has changed that. Any computer connected to the WWW can
share information with another computer through Resource Description
Framework which uses XML to share information. So, no longer to we have to
keep our information to ourselves. We can share that information
Thanks Mike, Drew, Lee,
I think you'll appreciate the result.
It contains most of your suggestions.
Still working on the content though, with a long way to go.
graphic design, copy writing, peer testing, user testing, etc.
http://homepage.mac.com/backtoslack/websemantics/
once again thanks for
Blimey, Mike, very smart :o) Will look forward to the finished result.
Looking good :o)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Foskett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike
Foskett
Sent: 08 July 2004 12:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Thanks Mike, Drew, Lee,
I think you'll
: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Dang, we certainly don't want to go to sleep these days. I wake up and am
caught in a mire.
Instead of writing several emails, I'm going to try and cover everyone's
issues here. I hope I don't miss anything or get people
]'
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Nothing wrong with a length where appropriate but double length is probably
trying everyone's patience so I'll be slightly rude and top post while
trying virtuously to be brief.
It's an interesting argument you make that css was given to us to make pages
look and perform
That's about as brief as my answers.
[quote] The Semantic Web provides a common framework that allows data to be
shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community
boundaries.[/quote]
Here's the full quote Lee:
The Semantic Web provides a
that little issue up.
Lee Roberts
http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.applepiecart.com
-Original Message-
From: Trusz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:57 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
That's about as brief as my answers.
[quote
]headers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lee Roberts
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Let's look at the Introduction to the Semantic Web.
[quote] Facilities to put machine
How we got on the subject of the Semantic web from headers I don't know.
I think we're somehow missing the entire point of the Semantic web. Even
prior to the development of RDF, OWL, XML and the like people were able to
partake and consume the information available from various sources. It
Peeps,
I thought I knew what I was doing with headers, now I'm getting confused.
My XHTML docs are structured like this:
titlePage name - Site name/title
h1Site name/h1 [not visible 2nd part of the title -
Placed behind an image of the same]
h1Content (Page name)
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Foskett
Sent: 07 July 2004 10:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Peeps,
I thought I knew what I was doing with headers, now I'm getting confused.
My XHTML docs are structured
Lee wrote:
There are more than W3C standards. While the W3C standards are great, they
leave too much to interpretation. Hence the problem that arises here.
Please explain why you might think a couple of sentences qualifies to be
under it's own sectional heading. I'd really be interested in
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Trusz, Andrew
Sent: 07 July 2004 12:48
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Lee wrote:
There are more than W3C standards. While the W3C standards are great, they
leave too much to interpretation. Hence the problem that arises
Drew,
I endorse the single h1 per page particularly because each page is judged on
its own when sought for relevancy in the search engines. That's from where
the majority of fresh users hit a site, based on search criteria.
Though others may argue that we shouldn't construct with a view to
Drew, Mike,
So, if I get this right then technically speaking:
titlePage name - Site name/title
divSite name/div [not visible 2nd part of the title -
Placed behind an image of the same]
h1Content (Page name) heading/h1 [visible 1st part of the title]
h2/h2
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Foskett
Sent: 07 July 2004 15:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Drew, Mike,
So, if I get this right then technically speaking:
titlePage name - Site name/title
divSite name/div [not visible 2nd part
Drew, Mike,
So, if I get this right then technically speaking:
titlePage name - Site name/title
divSite name/div [not visible 2nd part of the
title - Placed behind an image of the same]
h1Content (Page name) heading/h1 [visible 1st part of the title]
h2/h2
this helps. My apologies for being so long.
Sincerely,
Lee Roberts
http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.applepiecart.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Foskett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Drew, Mike,
So
I wake up and am caught in a mire.
That's your own fault for not being a die-hard 2-hour a day man. I dunno,
the youth of today , no stamina ... ;o)
From a search engine standpoint any form of hidden text is considered
spamming. That includes, but not limited to, negative positioning, placing
On the H1 issue, there are many
people that think using an H1 around the logo or hidden text.
Unfortunately, that is improper. Your H1 should be visible and should support the title of the
page.
Yes it does... but
I'm also quite confused. I thought the way I set up the page
,
Lee Roberts
http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.applepiecart.com
From: Trusz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 9:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
On the H1 issue, there are many people that think using
Hi Drew,
Thank you for your very detailed explanation. It was actually just what
I needed because I'm almost running over with reading specs from W3 and
numorus other sources. (It's now saved in my useful folder on my
backup drive)
Anyway your last paragraph did it for me because that just
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Lee Roberts
Sent: 06 July 2004 18:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Let's discuss some issues for a moment and perhaps some light will shine
upon some comments.
Drew [qoute]The vague discussion of some people not approving of
skipped levels does not say
Let's discuss some issues for a moment and perhaps some light will shine
upon some comments.
Drew [qoute]The vague discussion of some people not approving of
skipped levels does not say that a hierarchy of headings is
required.[/quote]
The vague discussion of some people refers to the
You're most welcome. Good luck with it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kim Kruse
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG]headers
Hi Drew,
Thank you for your very detailed explanation. It was actually
understood language.
I hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Lee Roberts
http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.applepiecart.com
-Original Message-
From: Trusz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [WSG]headers
Let's
26 matches
Mail list logo
