Roger that, command. Over :))
Felix Miata wrote:
I think if you digest http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5869 and
http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6153 you'll find represented the
behavior you've described. Linux simply does not have the same fonts as
doze, unless you've imported
You can use absolute positioning as long as it is inside a relatively
positioned block element.
Add
postion: relative;
to the td holding the div ad
and to the div ad
Add
position: absoloute; bottom: 0; left: 0;
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
The answer lies not in the * but in using a different selector. Sebastien
Guillon sent me a private answer:
This:
/*english */
a[hreflang=en]:after, a[hreflang=en-us]:after,
a[hreflang=en-ca]:after, a[hreflang=en-gb]:after,
a[hreflang=en-th]:after,
Hi All
As many of you may have seen, I created a search plugin for Alistapart.com
that allows you to search their posts for information.
That was just the tip of the iceberg. I really wanted to create something
that would allow me to search all of my favorite coding resources without
having to
Thank you Nick. That worked like a charm
:-)
Janelle
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cowie
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 12:05 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] How do I vertical-align bottom
You can use
Hi Ted,
I've wanted to use attribute selectors in my CSS rules, but have been concerned
about browser
support?
Please advise...
Kind regards,
Mario
Hi All
The answer lies not in the * but in using a different selector. Sebastien
Guillon sent me a
private answer:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/branching.asp
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
hi all,
maybe some suggestions for the ff-toolbar ...
http://www.sitepoint.com/
http://digital-web.com/
http://cssplay.co.uk/
http://tanfa.co.uk/
http://www.stylegala.com/
http://kottke.org/
http://www.wpdfd.com/
nice greetings from vienna :)
2005/10/6, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
I didnt have room for all of them
but Ive added most of the sites below.
Ted
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bit
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005
1:15 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Stop the
Presses! Announcing the supercool
Your website will not pull up for me.
Buddy
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
I didnt
have room for all of them
but Ive added most of the sites below.
Ted
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of bit
Sent: Thursday,
October 06, 2005
1:15
Hi buddy
The link got mangled, try www.tdrake.net its the first post.
Ted
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Buddy Quaid
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005
1:52 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Stop the
Presses! Announcing the
Interesting news this Friday morning. Does anyone have anymore info
on this?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1476554.htm
The CSIRO has won a bid to play a central role in setting standards
for the World Wide Web.
The organisation will now host the Australian office of the World
Weird, i cant get to the site...i think it's blocking my ISP or
something. I tried ping and nothing, i could trace and ping from an
outside website but not from my machine.
Buddy
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
Hi buddy
The link got
mangled, try www.tdrake.net its
the first
Fake Google Toolbars Spreading Identity Theft
Beware of guests bearing Google Toolbars. That's because a
series of phishing probes are making the rounds that deliver
a faked version. Install the real-looking software, and your
credit cards and other personal information are captured,
then
?
Im not sure what this is about. If
anyone knows that Rollyo is bad, speak up, but Im certainly not pushing
any fake googlebar scam. Im talking about the dropdown list that sits at
the top right of your firefox browser.
Dan Cederholm of Simplebits refers to the
site as
Don't take it personally, Ted,
I think Brian is putting forward a valid point - buyer / freeloader beware.
Google toolbars can actually do a lot of damage, so even when
installing one from a valid source, it pays to be aware of the risks.
That said, i think that there's a vast difference
adam reitsma wrote:
Google toolbars can actually do a lot of damage, so even when installing
one from a valid source, it pays to be aware of the risks.
That said, i think that there's a vast difference between installing a
feature from a known source (yourself), and installing one you got a
Hi Adam
I didnt take it personally. To be
honest, my first reaction was it might have been a bit of spam on its own. When
I clicked on the Google bar alert link, my computer froze.
Just so everyone is clear, this is not
part of the Google toolbar. Its part of your Firefox browser. I
Hi,
OK. I've been scratching my head all day. I need help.
I'm trying to implement a new site design.
The navigation - which I've uploaded a grab of at
http://www.chopstixmedia.com/new-nav.jpg - consists of html links separated
by a 1 pixel right-hand border... followed on the far right by a
Hi Ian,
Any thoughts on how I can achieve this?
If you could provide some pages of your previous attempts, that
would make life easier for some of us, so we can see what you've tried
so far, and what is not a desired outcome.
here's a basic one i did in invalid html, built over Listamatic's
From: Ian Main
Interesting news this Friday morning. Does anyone have anymore info
on this?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1476554.htm
W3c has a news item about it:
http://www.w3.org/
Ross Ackland profile:
On 7 Oct 2005, at 9:15 AM, Drake, Ted C. wrote:
it is going to make my life much easier
Ted, speaking of which - HTML messages, untrimmed - up to 34KB, and
counting. Do us a favour?
Thx - N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 10/7/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/branching.asp
Sure, but I'm in a hurry so please excuse me if I'm a bit short with
my reponse :)
Congratulations! Now your file is ready for
Adam wrote:
If you could provide some pages of your previous attempts, that would make
life easier for some of us, so we can see what you've tried so far, and what
is not a desired outcome.
Thanks for your help, Adam.
I've made a number of attempts. What I'm looking for really is examples of a
I must apologize for the jumbled mess that was my previous response to
this thread.
I have been informed that my posts come through with no line breaks
and encrypted nonsense at the end.
This is caused by the CustomizeGoogle firefox extension; more
specifically, the 'Secure Gmail' option.
I have
The undesirable outcomes are:
1) When the user enlarges the font, the 1 pixel separator in the nav does
not extend to fill the vertical height of the nav bar.
2) The text input field and submit button (an image) are not vertically
aligned as per the graphic I provided.
Perhaps this (very draft,
During one of Tantek's seminars at WE05, I assumed I was the last person
in the world to learn that Meta Keywords were no longer used by search
engines.
However, I have just received a document from a client who has been
advised by a search engine optimisation specialist [hitwise] to add
Well, I think the answer is a yes and no.
Google I don't think reads or puts any weight on the meta tags at all.
It does read a couple of meta tags like the 'revisit' meta tag and a
couple of others but not description or keywords. Google goes more by
link popularity and keyword density in
Martin,
However, I have just received a document from a client who has been
advised by a search engine optimisation specialist [hitwise] to add
specific Meta Keywords to pages in their site.
Get them to ask Hitwise to justify the recommendation, based on
anything other than handwaving and
On 10/7/05, John Allsopp wrote:
Get them to ask Hitwise to justify the recommendation, based on
anything other than handwaving and superstition.
I'd be interested in their response :-)
I think it is safe to say that we would *all* be interested in their
response, if they prepare one at all...
I second that.
Buddy
John Allsopp wrote:
Martin,
However, I have just received a document from a client who has been
advised by a search engine optimisation specialist [hitwise] to add
specific Meta Keywords to pages in their site.
Get them to ask Hitwise to justify the recommendation,
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jopson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 7 October 2005 2:23 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Meta Keywords?
During one of Tantek's seminars at WE05, I assumed I was the
last person
in the world to learn that Meta Keywords
So, from John Derek's responses, am I correct in thinking there's no use
for the Meta Keywords or Meta Description tags anymore?
Any web resources/ reference for this information?
I'd like a bit more knowledge before questioning Hitwise.
Thanks
Martin
On 10/7/05, Martin Jopson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, from John Derek's responses, am I correct in thinking there's no use
for the Meta Keywords or Meta Description tags anymore?
Any web resources/ reference for this information?
I'd like a bit more knowledge before questioning Hitwise.
In
I'd also add that for semantics we should be using them - so what if
search engines choose to use/not use/change they way they handle them.
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andreas Boehmer
[Addictive Media]
Sent: Friday, 7 October 2005
On 10/7/05, Martin Jopson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, from John Derek's responses, am I correct in thinking there's no use
for the Meta Keywords or Meta Description tags anymore?
Meta description is important! It's the one that Google uses when
displaying results. You can do a quick summary
I'd have to agree with Andreas here.
Wile for Ranking purposes they're not terribly important, at least
Description is still sometimes used by Search Engines.
Plus there's the added notion that Meta Tags *in and of themselves* are a
good thing to put in a page (as any librarian will tell
-Original Message-
From: Richard Czeiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 7 October 2005 3:09 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Meta Keywords?
I'd have to agree with Andreas here.
Wile for Ranking purposes they're not terribly important, at least
From: James Bennett
In my experience, they still read the Description tag, but don't
necessarily take it into account for ranking purposes; if the
Description is present it will be included in the excerpt shown in the
search result.
That matches my experience too.
--
Peter Williams
One of the things with standards is, standards mean that you aremuch more competitive, not just on a national scale but a global
scale ... If you want to sell your products and develop your productsthen standards is one of the great mechanisms through which you cando that and become competitive in
Derek Featherstone wrote:
On 10/7/05, John Allsopp wrote:
Get them to ask Hitwise to justify the recommendation, based on
anything other than handwaving and superstition.
I'd be interested in their response :-)
I think it is safe to say that we would *all* be interested in their
41 matches
Mail list logo
