I use TSWARE
Its AWESOME!
www.tsware.net
built in PHP/CSS/XHTML/JAVASCRIPT syntax hightligher.
it can tell when a PHP doc has PHP and HTML so they are higlighted with
their own type.
also HTML with embedded Javascript - it does that too.
built in FTP.
tabbed windows.
project manager - with todo
Hi all
This has been discussed ad nauseam previously on the list. Their is a
resource category on the site created just for this topic so that all
members can have quick access to available editors and add new ones.
http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat30
Please feel free to log in at the
I noticed this attribute as part of an img element in Mark Stanton's
presentation at the Sydney meeting last Thursday... he didn't make
reference to it, though, and I've been struggling to see the application
of it ever since.
Does longdesc really have to comprise a link to an external page, or
Ahh, I didn't even think about the possibility of using anchors! Thanks
for the informative response. :)
Josh
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 21:29, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
Does longdesc really have to comprise a link to an external page, or
can it simply be an extended version
On 20/09/2004, at 2:02 AM, Cameron Muir wrote:
Does IE support 'border-style: dotted' ? In my IE it renders as
dashed. Mozilla/Firefox are fine, of course.
I've certainly never seen it work -- definitely not in a
standards-compliant way. However, before you start bashing IE,
consider this
Thanks Justin. I really like dotted - oh well.
regards,
cameron.
Justin French wrote:
On 20/09/2004, at 2:02 AM, Cameron Muir wrote:
Does IE support 'border-style: dotted' ? In my IE it renders as
dashed. Mozilla/Firefox are fine, of course.
I've certainly never seen it work -- definitely not in
Hello,
I can't work out why this is producing an error. I'm sure there must be
a simple solution that I've missed.
body {
font: small Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;
color: #66;
}
The error:
URI : http://design.quagma.net/themes/quagma/style.css
* Line: 0 Context : sans-serif
Hi Cameron,
You have this
.paymate {
position: relative:
top: 20px;
right: 10px;
}
the position:relative needs a semi colon and you should be on your way
Regards,
John,
Cameron Muir wrote:
Hello,
I can't work out why this is producing an error. I'm sure there must be
a
Hmmm, I'm sorry I must have inadverdently left out
some text.
At www.guildinstitute.org, I have placed an image on
the left and text on the right. Currently the text
and image are in a 2-column table to keep each in a
separate column.
How can I achieve the same thing using CSS?
The style
IE 6 supports the dotted style - so long as the border width is above 2px.
...which totally sucks, because 1px dotted is nice ;)
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
** EDIT from above: It would seem that as of August 11th they have
altered it to include images from CSS... This is one of those times
I'm really glad I'm wrong :o
As for home testing... Could you include some form of timestamp using
php and then a javascvript onload function to work out the time
Logically, yes, but you'd need to be hosting on loopback, otherwise the
timestamps would most probably be out of sync (not a problem for most).
The initial question specified from initial request through to
completion, which means that we've got to take into account transport
time, for the leaner
Apologies if this has been discussed before.
What is better in terms of semantics and accessibility?
div id=footer
pstuff | more stuffbr /
stuff too | more stuff again/p
/div
or
div id=footer
ullistuff/li | limore stuff/li
listuff too/li | limore stuff again/li/ul
/div
Obviously the first one
Adding | between links in footer is good practice for screenreaders
because it breaks up the reading of the links.
But in the second example, you already do this with the list items, so
in terms of accessibility I doubt you would need to add | to them. Also
those | are outside the li/li so I'm not
Hi Amit,
Ben Bishop's presentation at the sydney WSG meeting outlined that he
used a list for his footer:
http://www.nzsteel.co.nz/nz/
He also used css for the divider, instead of pipes:
#footermenu li a {
height:1em;
padding:0 0.75em;
border-left:1px solid #999;
The semantics obviously depend on what stuff | more stuff and stuff
too | more stuff again actually are...
Patrick
Amit Karmakar wrote:
Apologies if this has been discussed before.
What is better in terms of semantics and accessibility?
div id=footer
pstuff | more stuffbr /
stuff too | more
If you were going to use the second example, I'd recommend using
border:whatever; instead of pipe characters...
My $AU0.03
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 11:22, Amit Karmakar wrote:
Apologies if this has been discussed before.
What is better in terms of semantics and accessibility?
div id=footer
adam reitsma wrote:
div id=footer
ullistuff/li | limore stuff/li/ul
ullistuff too/li | limore stuff again/li/ul
/div
Drop those | in between list items, as it's not valid markup (probably
just an oversight, but it's best to clarify nonetheless)
Patrick
Amit
It's a list of information for the user. You can use floats to turn
on/off horizontal/vertical display of the list. You'll have much more
control over the list display than with a br
Also, you should move the pipes within an li tag or use the li or a
border to act as the delimiter so a
Thanks for pointing that out John - serves me right for not cleaning out
disused styles.
However, I'm still getting the same error.
John Oxton wrote:
Hi Cameron,
You have this
.paymate {
position: relative:
top: 20px;
right: 10px;
}
the position:relative needs a semi colon and you
Thanks All,
I think lists is the way to go in this case, a paragraph is more
appropriate(some would say only ever appropriate) where it is truly a
paragraph of text/content
Well, time to rework my own footers :)
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 01:50:21 +, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amit
Hi Ian,
I had a similar problem with my site - I had some tables that refused to
display in the proper(desired) placement - they insisted on appearing below
the absolutely positioned element - way down the page.
I created a floating div and stuck them in that - seems to work, but I'm not
sure
Try
http://www.xat.com/wo/index.html
We've been using it and find it very helpful. I think you could set it
to unlimited speed to get just render times...
I want to test the render speed (from initial request through to
completion, and just the render once all files are cached) of some
23 matches
Mail list logo
