If i may be so bold as to blow my own trumpet for a minute:
http://www.splintered.co.uk/news/29/
-
the lovely molly holzschlag gets a makeover courtesy of redux, stylist
to the stars.
http://www.molly.com/2004/12/22/the-medusa-look/
the new look was actually created quite a long time ago (see
Patrick Lauke wrote:
the lovely molly holzschlag gets a makeover courtesy of redux, stylist
to the stars.
Lol, you make yourself sound like some kind of new media hair dresser.
Nice site though.
Andy Budd
http://www.message.uk.com/
**
The
From: Andy Budd
Lol, you make yourself sound like some kind of new media hair dresser.
Well, I *did* give her the Medusa hair look ;)
I'll need to add wash, rinse and perm under my list of services...
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
Miles
Try this:
#breadcrumbs li {white-space:nowrap;}
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:25:28 +1030, Miles Tillinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to represent the path as an unordered list, e.g.
Home Level One Level Two Level Three etc.
ul
liHome/li
liLevel One/li
The voices are telling me Krassy said on 12/21/2004 7:23 PM:
A while back I had compiled a list of some good Color
Scheme Tools here:
http://www.krassycandoit.com/blah/2004/06/color-scheme-tools.html
Me too: http://toolkit.crispen.org/index.php?cat=color
Most of the color tools that were mentioned
I wish someone would produce a color scheme generator (not just a
wheel) using the web smart palette.
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:25:31 -0600, Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The voices are telling me Krassy said on 12/21/2004 7:23 PM:
A while back I had compiled a list of some
I like:
http://www.webwhirlers.com/colors/wheel.asp
has a colour wheel and some theory behind colors.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the
Miles Tillinger wrote:
However in situations where the path is extremely long the list will not
wrap and breaks my layout, so I've had to float the div so it will wrap.
This in turn causes problems with the title if the path information goes
beyond one line.
I checked both Firefox 1.0 and IE6 and
Never include the ?xml declaration.
And then use UTF-8.
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
There's no background colour for the BODY, it appears. Was that deliberate?
Have You Validated Your Code?
John Horner(+612 / 02) 9333 3488
Senior Developer, ABC Online
Hey all,
I'm interested to hear what WSGers think is the best way to implement
alternating row colours in a table.
From what I can see there is no way to do this using CSS alone, all
the methods I've seen use either JavaScript or server side logic to
generate the row colours.
Is this a
Apart from specific classes on alternate rows, it is possible to style
alternate rows without adding markup to the structure using adjacent sibling
selectors. Be aware of IE's lack of support. Here is a sample from older
post on similar question:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/css/adjacent2.htm
Is this a limitation of the CSS model that you can't do this? Is there
a logical way this can be incorporated into CSS?
CSS3 --
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-css3-selectors-2003/#structural-pseudos
tr:nth-child(2n+1) /* represents every odd row of a HTML table */
tr:nth-child(odd) /* same */
Hi
just an update, I guess mainly for those in Wellington and possibly
wider NZ, but I think also good to let others know what we're planning!
I'm pleased to announce that on Thrusday 24th February 2005, we'll be
holding a WSG presentation in Wellington. Venue and cost are to be
determined,
Web Accessibility Workshops in Melbourne and Canberra
The National Information and Library Service (NILS) is running Web and
Online Accessibility Workshops in Melbourne on 10 February and in Canberra
on 16 and 17 February 2005. These workshops introduce accessibility issues
in terms of
John Horner wrote:
There's no background colour for the BODY, it appears. Was that deliberate?
The CSS has passed through a few hands and various iterations since I
had a proper look at it months ago. I'm currently going through it with
Molly now that it's live, to make final
I always code my CSS and check it in Firefox. I have added the box hacks to
my CSS to fix it for IE5 and IE6 - but now it is just a bit off in my right
column using Firefox. I have been racking my brain trying to figure what I
could have that is wrong in here.
Can someone have a second look so
I can tell you why I am not WOWed by it.. It is not clean, and tight, and
that is what pleases my eye. For me, it looks very amateur. However, any
person that takes a chance and dives in doing css gets kudos from me, but
not all online artistry even done in css is something that commends those
How SOON they forget! I was very disappointed at how many colour tools
went some of the way and didn't go all the way to doing what I want.
For example too many didn't allow you to save the results. And the flash
based ones meant you couldn't even cut and paste the HEX results anywhere -
when
If an enterprising WSG member had 20 minutes on their hands they could add
all of these tools under a newly formed resource category called Colour
tools.
Then, people would never forget any colour tool - and we would not have to
keep having off-topic posts about colour tools!
:)
Russ
Have a
I dig all the changes so far :D
Good work Patrick, and congrats on getting an 'A-list blogger' as a client!
Andrew.
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Just updated the Color Tools resource category. Tried to include
descriptive teasers too.
Merry Christams to all.
xe
russ - maxdesign wrote:
If an enterprising WSG member had 20 minutes on their hands they could add
all of these tools under a newly formed resource category called Colour
tools.
Your home page is very attractive.
A bit of humble pie - I validated your home page using your referral button 'xhtml' and got 15 errors.
Your CSS shows one related error:
Please, validate your XML document first!
Line 164
Column 25
The element type img must be terminated by the matching end-tag
Ok, enough.
The aim of this list is not to criticise other members but to help and
support them. If we start down this road it will only end in tears.
Russ
Your home page is very attractive.
A bit of humble pie - I validated your home page using your referral
button 'xhtml' and got 15
If this is off-topic - Just let it die for lack of reply!
I have an 'affiliate' link on my web site for the Opera browser (And, yes for Firefox, Mozilla and Netscape as well).
The problem is that the link does not validate in XHTML 1.1.
This same problem shows up on many other sites using
Lori Leach wrote:
I always code my CSS and check it in Firefox. I have added the box
hacks to my CSS to fix it for IE5 and IE6 - but now it is just a bit
off in my right column using Firefox. I have been racking my brain
trying to figure what I could have that is wrong in here.
Can someone
Will Jensen wrote:
The problem is that the link does not validate in XHTML 1.1.
This same problem shows up on many other sites using affiliate links
for all kinds of products, not just for Opera.
It's a very common problem and I believe the validator gives you a link
that explains how to fix it,
Bert and Jeroen,
Thanks, I did go to the link at W3C on ampersands. That is what triggered the query.
I am concerned that if someone uses the 'corrected' link to go to the Opera site, that the use of amp; will cause an error in the affiliate ID registration process... Or is this just foolishness
28 matches
Mail list logo
