Oops. Of course that URI should have read:
http://www.w3.org/International/technique-index#language
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida
Sent: 25 February 2005 08:30
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Other character sets/languages
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:23:44 -0800, Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/24/05 3:16 PM John [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Has anyone (else) noticed an increase in sites implementing primarily orange
and blue color schemes? Is this for accessibility or other considerations,
or
Well, http://www.w3.org/International/technique-index#language I guess.
djn
Richard Ishida wrote:
http://localhost/International/technique-index#language
begin:vcard
fn:Dejan Kozina
n:Kozina;Dejan
org:Dejan Kozina Web Design Studio
adr:;;Dolina 346;Dolina;TS;I-34018;Italy
email;internet:[EMAIL
I think you pretty much answered your own question already. :)
Leslie Riggs
I am just about to complete a new site for a client, and I have coded
it according to XHTML 1.0 strict guidelines. I am also using validated
CSS. Do you think it is worth displaying the W3C compliance logos at
the
I personally try to place this information in the accessibility statement.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion list for
Stephen,
Until recently, my feelings were precisely as expressed in your third
paragraph!
However, I just upgraded a website for a holiday business, and I explained
to the owner that it was now done to standards and all that stuff. It meant
zero to her, but at least she could appreciate that
If it wouldn't be too much of a problem, I'd like it if someone checked
my site.
I've made all the pages valid code (last time I checked), but I'm not
very knowledgeable about accessability issues and would like some
suggestions on that.
Thanks in advance,
Alan Trick
d'oh, normally I'm not this stupid, really :-[
here's the url: http://jellybean.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
Should lead to yet another tool, Visio or
OmniGraffle, if so what is recommended on the MAC OS
side?
Chris,
You might want to
look into this article by Andy Clarke (And all that
Malarkey):
http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/css_markup_guides.html
He uses Macromedia
Fireworks
What you may want to do is insted of the displaying that logo, use the
smaller ones, like the ones at the bottom of this (http://plone.org/) page.
Also, this is off-topic, but the page displays an 'Invalid Security'
image with a link to http://www.statcounter.com/ when javascript is
turned
Hi,
I've a problem with this page http://republicana.dk/kontakt.php (and the
2 other forms in that group) in Opera 7.5 on W2K system. I really can't
figure out why they drop in Opera. They are OK in other browser I've
installed on my system... FF, IE.
Thank you
Kim
- Original Message -
From: Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] To display or not to display validation logos?
What you may want to do is insted of the displaying that logo, use the
smaller ones, like the
Pardon my hasty question, but I'm off to bed and wanted to get this off
my chest before doing so...
When doing absolute positioning, can it be done so that it's based on a
table or div rather than the window itself? You can see at
http://www.drzeus.net/clients/stevierays/ that I have an image
designer wrote:
[1] Do folk regard the w3c validation logos in much the same way that other
industries regard the kitemark?
I think an important thing to remember here is: who are these logos for?
Sure, you get the peer recognition, but do consumers and end users
*really* care about whether or
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:41:24 -, designer wrote:
[1] Do folk regard the w3c validation logos in much the same way that other
industries regard the kitemark?
Having never heard of a 'kitemark' I googled, and got this:
http://www.bsi-global.com/Kitemark/index.xalter
I assume the 'heart
If an element (your image) is positioned with absolute, inside another
element (a div) that is positioned with relative (it is easy to make
divs center-align), it should follow the absolute positioning, but
still be in the div.
**
The discussion
Perhaps the leading use of blue on websites has to do
with the psychology of the colour. It is known that in dreams
blue is a recurring phenom associated with comforting
authority, and is often dominant in sleeping dreams,
day dreams, and vivid externalized images (apparitions,
hallucinations).
I'm not sure I agree when it comes to you shouldn't plaster a site with
stickers for valid xhtml/css/508 etc. I guess we all have a common
interest in higher awareness about standards. Maybe the stickers wont
mean anything to all people but lets hope they'll ask what it is. That
way the
Perhaps we need a simple page to link to, explaining what standards are
for,in terms that the non-tech viewer can appreciate?
I like that idea...
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I've a problem with this page http://republicana.dk/kontakt.php (and the
2 other forms in that group) in Opera 7.5 on W2K system. I really can't
figure out why they drop in Opera. They are OK in other browser I've
installed on my system... FF, IE.
This is known bug in Opera. Fieldsets
I wish this weren't so off-topic, web standards wise. There have been some
interesting posts that go beyond just coding but making out sites more
effective.
For more information on the effects of blue, look at the works of Yves Klein,
an artist from Paris in the 1950's? Some will disregard
Kim Kruse wrote:
I guess we all have a common
interest in higher awareness about standards.
But again, who are we targetting with these? Site visitors? Site owners?
Our peer web developers?
Maybe the stickers wont
mean anything to all people but lets hope they'll ask what it is. That
way the
Thank you very much
Kim
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
23 matches
Mail list logo
