Re: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - APOLOGY

2005-09-17 Thread Ingo Chao
russ wrote you should warn members if you are providing a link that goes to questionable, offensive or adult content. Mani Sheriar wrote: But I do still need help with this issue if anyone can look past the questionable material. ;~) This list needs no ground rule like - Warning ...

Re: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - APOLOGY

2005-09-17 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 9/16/05 11:15 PM Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: russ wrote you should warn members if you are providing a link that goes to questionable, offensive or adult content. Mani Sheriar wrote: But I do still need help with this issue if anyone can look past the questionable

Re: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - APOLOGY

2005-09-17 Thread Ingo Chao
Rick Faaberg wrote: Where do we draw the line on these sites? The reason why this did not happen before on the WSG mail list is because no poster before did have problems in drawing a line for himself. We should not change this unwritten agreement. Ingo

Censorship (was RE: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - APOLOGY)

2005-09-17 Thread John Foliot - WATS.ca
Ingo Chao wrote: Rick Faaberg wrote: Where do we draw the line on these sites? The reason why this did not happen before on the WSG mail list is because no poster before did have problems in drawing a line for himself. We should not change this unwritten agreement. Please do not impose

[WSG] IE Showing Transparent - FIXED (sort of)

2005-09-17 Thread Mani Sheriar
Again I am sorry for causing all this disharmony in the group. It was not my intention I acted without thinking as much as I should about it. I should have alerted you folks that there was questionable content. Anyway, if any of you are interested in the actual xhtml/css problem, this

Re: Censorship (was RE: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - APOLOGY)

2005-09-17 Thread Ingo Chao
John Foliot, and Russ, good luck with the list. All the best. Bye. Ingo Chao -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints

Re: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - FIXED (sort of)

2005-09-17 Thread Bruce
I don't see any disharmony :-) Was simple and easy to resolve and all is well as far as I can see. Hopefully it won't get blown out of proportion. Bruce Prochnau BKDesign Solutions - Original Message - From: Mani Sheriar To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Saturday,

[WSG] a: class border width problem

2005-09-17 Thread kvnmcwebn
Hello list members, Im doing something ignorant with the below code but i dont know what. I want to add a round corner to the far left button of my navbar. Im using the class .corner to insert a bg image in the button. It works apart from the stuborn bottom border that wont go away. Any

Re: Censorship (was RE: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - APOLOGY)

2005-09-17 Thread David Laakso
Ingo Chao wrote: John Foliot, and Russ, good luck with the list. All the best. Bye. Ingo Chao Ditto. ~d -- David Laakso http://www.dlaakso.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] images in html or css

2005-09-17 Thread David Hucklesby
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:48:13 -0700, Ben Curtis wrote: On Sep 16, 2005, at 1:43 PM, kvnmcwebn wrote: browsers do not cache the images linked from the stylesheet so caching is a little more work wow, thats news to me. I believe that's actually browser, singular. Who else, but IE? Hi Ben -

RE: [WSG] AOL browser bug

2005-09-17 Thread Jonathan Bloy
On September 16, 2005 6:36 AM Duncan Stigwood wrote: Which version of IE does AOL use and is there a way of installing it to check for bugs? It's a positioning bug which I thought i'd fixed for IE. Each new version of AOL uses whatever version of IE that was new at the time. Installing AOL also

Re: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - THREAD CLOSED

2005-09-17 Thread russ - maxdesign
ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED It seems some people forgot to read the last admin post: If you have any questions, suggestions or comments about this, please DO NOT send them to the list. Instead, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] We do not want to clog the list with moral or ethical debates. Again, this is a web

Re: Censorship (was RE: [WSG] ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED

2005-09-17 Thread russ - maxdesign
ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED See previous admin post Russ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help

Re: [WSG] a: class border width problem

2005-09-17 Thread Kay Smoljak
On 9/18/05, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im using the class .corner to insert a bg image in the button. It works apart from the stuborn bottom border that wont go away. Any explanations for this? Could it be a specificity problem? Instead of .corner{} try #drNav a.corner{}. -- Kay

Re: [WSG] a: class border width problem

2005-09-17 Thread Kay Smoljak
sorry, didn't look closely enough... that would be #drNav li.corner a{} On 9/18/05, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/05, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im using the class .corner to insert a bg image in the button. It works apart from the stuborn bottom border that wont go

[WSG] two column

2005-09-17 Thread JoAn
Hi! I'm new to the list and to CSS. I really need a two column source-ordered CSS layout so that the left column can be used for navigation and the 2nd column would be for content. I suppose I'd need about 160px for the left nav and the balance for the content. But I'd like the content

RE: [WSG] a: class border width problem

2005-09-17 Thread Scott Swabey - Lafinboy Productions
Hi The problem would appear to be that you have applied the border to the li using the #drNav, and are trying to override that assignement by reseting the border on the nested a element. Try changing the .corner class to apply to the nested a: /* css */ #drNav a { margin: 0px; float:left;

RE: [WSG] two column

2005-09-17 Thread Scott Swabey - Lafinboy Productions
Hi JoAn, and welcome to the list Have a read of some of the articles over at A List Apart (http://www.alistapart.com/articles/negativemargins/) which should give you a good grounding for a source ordered 2 column layout. Regards Scott Swabey Lafinboy Productions www.lafinboy.com -Original

RE: [WSG] two column

2005-09-17 Thread Ryan Blunden
Hi JoAn, WSG member Andrew Krespanis put together an excellent presentation on a 3-column content source ordered layout at http://www.leftjustified.net/site-in-an-hour/ with the actual site at http://www.leftjustified.net/site-in-an-hour/site/. I realise that you're after a two column layout