Well i am designer also knowing the HTML and CSS Stuff. So my duty is to
design the template based on client requirements.
First of all i do paper work, then incorporate it in to a prototype using
Photoshop then show it to client for approval if approved hand over the HTML
page with style
Hello Thierry,
What about marking up * used in forms with ABBR elements?
In your example you left the text instruction.
pFields marked with * (asterisk) are required./p
Thus I'd say further treatment is unnecessary. And if you change that by
removing the text instruction, there's no
Hi,
I don't quite see how you get your possible interpretation.
To summarise what it says:
1. for implicit association, enclose the form control in the label.
2. if you use implicit association (i.e. enclose the form control in the
label) it can only contain one control element.
It is
Hi Guys,
Firstly I do apologise if this posting is not in line with this list's
guidelines.
I'm struggling with a problem and hope that you can give me some advice;
This is my problem story:
My client's website is rather busy with 30,000+ unique visitors each month.
There are a few
Your correct its not inline with the guidelines and has nothing to do with
Web Standards what so ever. Why did you post it if you knew that it was
against the standards?
Peter sent out this email last week to everyone, so you have no excuse.
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
If
This post is off topic and the thread is now closed.
If you would like to help Bas, please email him off list
warmly
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
WSG Core Group
On Sat, 26 May 2007 16:35:04 +0800, Bas V wrote:
Now my questions to you:
a) Is there a way to detect which anti-virus software is used by a
On 26 May 2007, at 06:42:08, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Yes, the second title attribute is missing because of a post of
yours in the
thread Acronym tag usage :)
:-)
I think however that, if you adopt this approach, this may be one of
those cases where it might make sense to expand the
OK, thanks for your help, I just thought there may be some kind of
HTML tag that adds seperate semantic value to the introductory
paragraph, to differentiate it from the strong text in the body, like
the big tag for example.
I will probably use the strong tag then.
Cheers
Paul
On 25/05/07,
Stay away from Strong. Strong is presentational, same as B, and I.
Presentation
should be in HTML and content in HTML.
use span class=important for text that needs to be emphasised.
On 5/26/07, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, thanks for your help, I just thought there may be some
TYPO ALERT!
Presentation should be in CSS and Content in HTML.
God knows what made me type HTML twice.
On 5/26/07, Jamie Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stay away from Strong. Strong is presentational, same as B, and I.
Presentation
should be in HTML and content in HTML.
use span
Stay away from Strong. Strong is presentational, same as B, and I.
Presentation
should be in HTML and content in HTML.
use span class=important for text that needs to be emphasised.
I would argue to the contrary. Strong has much more meaning than a span
class. The word /tag itself implies
Jamie Collins wrote:
Stay away from Strong. Strong is presentational, same as B, and I.
Aeh...excuse me? Since when?
Presentation
should be in CSS and content in HTML.
use span class=important for text that needs to be emphasised.
Sorry, but that's rubbish. If text *needs to be
Patrick,
It all depends on the person using it. I have seen alot of people use strong
to bold general peices of text. There is
a big difference in making text bold and empasising its meaning.
If the use for stong is a valid use, then i wont disagree. I must have
read the first post wrong, i
Stay away from Strong. Strong is presentational, same as B, and I.
Presentation
should be in HTML and content in HTML.
use span class=important for text that needs to be emphasised.
I would argue to the contrary. Strong has much more meaning than a
span class. The word /tag itself implies
At 5/26/2007 05:59 AM, Paul Collins wrote:
OK, thanks for your help, I just thought there may be some kind of
HTML tag that adds seperate semantic value to the introductory
paragraph, to differentiate it from the strong text in the body, like
the big tag for example.
I will probably use the
Paul Novitski wrote:
I think the problem with using strong to demarcate your introduction
isn't that strong is presentational (it's not) but rather that it does
nothing to express what's different semantically about an introduction.
You may wish to present the introductory paragraph in a
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Foulstone schreef:
I don't quite see how you get your possible interpretation.
To summarise what it says:
1. for implicit association, enclose the form control in the label.
2. if you use implicit association (i.e. enclose the form control in the
label) it can only contain
On 26 May 2007, at 18:04:38, Designer wrote:
Presumably, p title=introduction and p id=introduction
would do the trick also?
Using the title attribute means pointing-device-users would get a
tooltip saying introduction obscuring the text if they happened to
have the cursor hovering over
Totally agree. Applying 'title' attributes to block level elements is a
nightmare for users of screen magnifiers because they can't figure out how
to get rid of the tooltip whilst keeping the content in view. You would be
surprised how much of the screen is obscured by a tooltip at magnification
Steve Green wrote:
Totally agree. Applying 'title' attributes to block level elements is a
nightmare for users of screen magnifiers because they can't figure out how
to get rid of the tooltip whilst keeping the content in view. You would be
surprised how much of the screen is obscured by a
On Behalf Of Sander Aarts
... English is not my native language adds to my misinterpretation though.
Welcome to the club ;)
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines:
On Behalf Of Mike at Green-Beast.com
What about marking up * used in forms with ABBR elements?
In your example you left the text instruction.
pFields marked with * (asterisk) are required./p
Thus I'd say further treatment is unnecessary. And if you change that
by
removing the text
At 5/26/2007 10:04 AM, Designer wrote:
Presumably, p title=introduction and p id=introduction
would do the trick also? My own preference would be for the latter.
Of course, if you are referring to a GROUP of paragraphs
constituting the introduction, then Paul's class would have to be used.
most screen reader users don't expand abbreviations, they would
only get asterisk
spoken to them. They might wonder what its significance is.
Any user might wonder what an asterisk is for without instructional
text.
How about just including (required) on the end of each label, or
On Behalf Of Terrence Wood
most screen reader users don't expand abbreviations, they would only get
asterisk
spoken to them. They might wonder what its significance is.
Interesting. I used to think the same thing, but someone in a recent
thread told me:
On the other hand, screen-readers are
25 matches
Mail list logo
