font might at least serve as a
starting point for a table for another font.
BTW, I don't like bleeding, so I haven't even tried this as yet...
Mike Maxwell
CASL/ U MD
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org
suppose I'm not a good judge.)
But maybe that's not what Apostolos is talking about...
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Normal
Copyright: ISFOC-SANSKRIT-DEVANAGARI-SUREKH-NORMAL. Copyright
(c) 1997-98, C-DAC, PUNE, INDIA.
---
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
in that font! After getting
xdvipdfmx
to work, I'm still seeing this issue on 10.6 only, though at least it's
successfully substituting a Computer Modern bullet where xdv2pdf
couldn't.
Just a guess, but could it be that the font doesn't have that character?
Mike Maxwell
system + documentation; it is often
converted to C for compilation. And TeX itself doesn't look anything like
LISP to me, but maybe I'm missing s.t.? (Like a CAR and a CDR and...)
Can someone enlighten me/us here?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions
hard-coded. I hope someone (John
Frampton?) will correct me if I'm mis-interpreting this.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
for similar
filenames, or a file with a suffix like .bkp or some such. Be sure to look
for hidden files. It's also possible there's something in /tmp, if this is
a *nix system.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
!
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
the virama is usually omitted in text written
for native speakers, so this problem seldom comes up. We're writing it in
our grammar for the edification of non-native speakers.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:51:59 +1100, Andrew Cunningham
lang.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2011 08:16, maxwell maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu wrote:
With the Lohit and Bangla fonts in XeLaTeX, I get the same result: the
vowel sign E, which should hop over just the first consonant to its
left
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:16:39 -0400, maxwell maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
wrote:
I have to admit that this was done with the TeXLive 2009 version of
xetex.
I need to get the 2010 version installed...
I am now the proud runner of the 2010 version. (Don't laugh, it's only
2011!) And I can confirm
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:54:53 +0200, Susan Dittmar susan.ditt...@gmx.de
wrote:
Quoting Mike Maxwell (maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu):
Is there a way with xe(la)tex to display change bars (those vertical
lines in the margins marking text that's changed)?
I do not know the answer to your question, as I
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:40:38 -0700 (PDT), Apostolos Syropoulos
asyropou...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't think you need to modify xdvipdfmx but instead you need to
modify
the package itself. I will try to modify the package but some time next
week.
Wow, that would be great!
Mike Maxwell
point (U+0103) or as a combination of code points (LATIN SMALL LETTER A:
U+0061 plus COMBINING BREVE: U+0306).
Can't (shouldn't!) you pass your texts through a Unicode normalization
process? Otherwise search on them might not work either, depending on how
smart your search tool is.
Mike Maxwell
it. (I think there's a hack with iconv that allows it to
create decomposed forms, but that is not a bidirectional conversion.)
Maybe someone else on this list knows of tools that do that. (What OS are
you working on?)
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions
means to
output errors to stdout (or stderr?), but where is the effect of
\tracinglostchars described? In particular, what error msgs should I look
for if normalization fails or a font lacks a normalized character?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions
you add two digits, both of which are 1, you have to
carry into the next column; hence the name, You Carry It, since corrupted
to Eukaryote.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo
fortunate to need xelatex just as it had matured.)
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
to be able to reliably copy Unicode text
from the PDF, but (a) that issue isn't confined to program listings, and
(b) that would only solve the character ordering part of the problem.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
into this (and come up with a work-around).
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
doesn't seem to provide that info).
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:53:56 +0100, Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de
wrote:
Am 15.2.2012 um 18:29 schrieb maxwell:
(fc-list doesn't seem to provide that info)
It does:
fc-list : file family fullname lang | grep -i schehera
/Library/Fonts/Extrafonts/ScheherazadeRegOT.ttf
to a file?), the second line is still there--things like
undefined on input line 211
Is there no way to tell xetex to suppress warnings, while keeping true
error msgs?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
ligature encoding. Maybe someone else on this
list knows.
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
fine inside alltt.
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
/pipermail/xetex/2011-December/022463.html
is relevant.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
by italics (see below),
things get weirder:
I haven't tried this on my Windows/Cygwin machine yet (I'm on another
machine now).
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
, if the 0..3 part is any indication, xetex is now using
Harfbuzz, correct?
Mike Maxwell
The gentle giants of Harfang salute you.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 2013-12-03 17:27, maxwell wrote:
Anyway, if the 0..3 part is any indication, xetex is now using
Harfbuzz, correct?
Aargh, just noticed that the version information already says this.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
On 2013-12-09 11:15, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
A bit off topic, dou you know a good Linux text editor woth properly
implemented bidi algorithm so that I could type multilingual texts?
Yudit (http://www.yudit.org/) claims to be that. I have not used it.
Mike Maxwell
).
Regards,
Khaled
Afaict, this does not work under the TeXLive 2013 version, at least not
with this publisher's font. Am I missing s.t.?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman
the TeXLive 2013 version =
3.1415926-2.5-0..3-2013060708.)
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 2014-06-17 11:31, maxwell wrote:
Late last year, I ran into a problem in which I could embed a PDF
v1.4, but not v1.5 (I have not tried this with newer versions of PDFs,
which are now up to 1.7). The problem and its work-around are
described here:
http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2012
had the
problem.
Thanks to Bruno for this package, and for responding to my original msg.
Mike Maxwell
On 2013-02-09 14:34, Mike Maxwell wrote:
On 2/9/2013 6:29 AM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
I'm the author of morewrites, which has to perform various hacks to go
around the hard limitation
fill fill fill fillfillfillfi.
} refer to second footnote.\footnote{Another footnote.}
\end{document}
--
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
create a PDF using pdflatex, and import
that into my xetex file instead of the original jpg. But before I try
all these things, it would be nice to know if someone else has found a
work-around...
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive
Mike Maxwell (me) wrote:
I'm looking at one of our
jpgs in a text editor, and while I see the string Exif near the
top,
I don't see any jfif-like string.
Stefan Solbrig wrote:
You can find 'JFIF' of tombe.jpg at position 6, meaning, there are
six other bytes before the string.
OK, I can
a StripOffsets tag.)
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
seem to be the same thread,
and afaict are irrelevant.
We're running the version of xetex that came with TeXLive 2014
(3.14159265-2.6-0.1) on Linux.
Any suggestions as to what I should be looking for?
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
,
and 'which ghostscript' returns v8.70); but at least we have s.t. to
look at.
But--how did you figure this out? I see no mention of
Ghostscript/Postscript in the error msg.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
original?
I don't think so, but I'll certainly check when this other user gets
back (Wednesday).
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 2014-08-27 18:49, maxwell wrote:
On 2014-08-27 18:16, Jonathan Kew wrote:
I'm curious why Ghostscript is being run at all. Is it trying to
convert a PostScript or EPS graphic, when you intended to use a PDF
directly? Maybe one of the users has a different version of the
graphics package
, and that some developers may not realize that (or not
realize the implications).
How do I find the exact license restrictions on a truetype font?
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc
certainly the sort of thing I was looking for. How did you
extract that? (and from what file?)
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
in the Scheherazade font
either, and xdvipdfmx treats that as embeddable.
So I'm not sure in FontForge how to get at the embeddability information
that xdvipdfmx (and Microsoft's font info plugin) is using.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive
and as UTF-16; at a guess, the
latter is what Lorna reported in the Windows app (and what I also see in
FontForge) as looking like a Chinese license!
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman
PDF does subset the font, which is probably not the correct result if
the no subsetting restriction in the font is taken at face value.)
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 2014-09-22 22:04, Axel E. Retif wrote:
On 09/22/2014 08:42 PM, Mike Maxwell wrote:
I guess these jokers haven't heard of Unicode. Are they stuck back in
the 1990s?
Are you and Philip Taylor even aware that you're replying directly to
an arXiv administrator?
I think arXiv and Cornell
}
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
optical size...
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Scale as I would if I simply specified a larger point size?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
that; I _think_ it's to precede the combining
character by a non-breaking space (U+00A0). But I haven't tried that.
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo
for that use case.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
or the other of the places, loading
the bidi bpackage before or after the \captionsetup command (it cannot
be loaded before the caption pkg is loaded), etc.
Did anyone else notice this last year, and if so, has it been fixed in
the 2015 distro?
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
On 10/20/2015 9:34 PM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
On Oct 20, 2015, at 7:55 PM, maxwell <maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu>
wrote:
I've encountered a problem in the interaction between the
longtable, bidi, and caption packages.
>> ...
The longtable environment is like a tabular environment,
r the help!
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 2016-06-20 16:20, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
otfinfo --scripts font-file.otf
Thanks, that's what I needed. For some reason otfinfo doesn't show up
with 'apropos' on my machine...
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information
ssfully using Script= with the name of a script,
e.g 'Script=Thaana', where Thaana is the name of a script, Dhivehi is
the name of the language that uses the Thaana script.)
Is this font using a non-standard way of tagging scripts? Or am I
misunderstanding the way these codes are supposed to wor
h "does
not contain script", but not afaict any that tell me how to determine
what scripts a font supports.
It may of course be possible that this font supports the Bengali script,
but doesn't explicitly say that. But it makes
a problem.
But surely there are lots of people out there happily using xelatex and
hyperref without any problem, right? Why is this only showing up now?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman
ou send me the full log off list and I'll see if I can
debug
Will do, thanks!
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
vanilla
install, I think the only non-default choice we made was to use
'letter' instead of 'a4'.
3) Is this a bug? (meaning should I report it?)
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman
fontspec seems to be necessary for this bug to happen. And I'm
not actually invoking either bidi or fontspec.
Can someone reproduce this?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo
tex creds are not good):
\usepackage{bidi}
\csname @Latintrue\endcsname
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
"I cannot believe that our existence in this universe
is a mere quirk of fate, an accident of history, an
incidental blip in the great co
ary/2to3.html
I think the only thing it didn't completely fix in several large
programs we ran through it was the encoding conversion of
stdin/stdout/stderr. As I recall, it has something to do with Python
trying to detect the encoding in the shell
On 2016-01-21 03:11, Stefan Solbrig wrote:
The documentation in the texlive installation contains a document
(xetex-reference.pdf) that describes this in detail. (locate the file
or type "texdoc xetex" if you have texlive installed.)
thanks, that's what I needed!
Mi
documents looking for misplaced diacritics...
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
-0.2, from the
TeX Live 2015 distro) says it uses Graphite2 v1.2.3. Will the next TeX
Live distro's version of xetex use >= v.1.3.5?
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
"I cannot believe that our existence in this universe
is a mere quirk of fate, an
Purnendu's original subject line, which got
changed to "XeTeX Digest..." in the last reply.
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
"I cannot believe that our existence in this universe
is a mere quirk of fate, an accident of history, an
incidental bl
I can make a MWE if that would help; I'm just hoping someone else has
already run into this problem and has a work-around :-).
Mike Maxwell
University of Washington
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 2016-07-22 13:29, maxwell wrote:
The new version of Adobe Acrobat (which I have the misfortune to be
using at my office) is outputting a warning where we didn't used to
get a warning. Namely, it complains about one particular font in our
PDFs. The warning is:
Cannot extract the embedded
ts in both proportionally and mono-spaced versions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fira_Sans
I'm not sure what its code point coverage is, nor whether it handles
stacked diacritics; we'll see.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List inform
On 2016-07-22 14:55, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
2016-07-22 20:05 GMT+02:00 maxwell <maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu>:
On 2016-07-22 13:29, maxwell wrote:
...
Moral of the story: upgrade fonts before complaining.
I had an opposite experience a few years ago. It was necessary to
downgrade the DejaVu
I suppose that might need to be done at
the level of /etc/fonts/local.conf.) Thank you though!
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
over TTF fonts fc-list finds two such fonts.
--
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
spec gives a warning when I do
\newfontfamily\bengalifont[Script=Bengali]{Nikosh}
unless I change
\newfontscript{Bengali}{bng2,beng}
to
\newfontscript{Bengali}{beng}
in fontspec-xetex.sty.
Thanks for the pointer, Jonathan!
Mike Maxwell
--
Su
k? Either in the font, or in
xetex itself. (There's obviously an issue with the new version of the
font, since earlier versions worked; but given that their copy of xetex
works on this latest font and mine doesn't, it's possible there's also
something amiss with the version of xetex I have.)
Micha
and xdvipdfmx
should want a .woff file?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
t need), and the
problem seems to have gone away.
Thank you, Philip, for bringing the above post to my attention!
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
) it?
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
not clear to me
whether this can get into xetex before the next TeXLive release, given
the schedule here:
https://www.tug.org/texlive/
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo
developers of that font, although I suppose
Martin is the expert on this issue.
I can also take this off-line if that would be more appropriate.
Mike Maxwell
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo
portability and consistency. The other
side of this, of course, is that they don't automatically benefit from
library updates.
Which brings me back to my original question: will xetex as distributed
in TeXLive 2017 include this harfbuzz update? Or is it too late for
that?
Mike Maxwell
wouldn't help anyway.
For the time being, doing the following before bidi is loaded seems to
solve the problem:
-
\let\XeTeX\relax
\let\XeLaTeX\relax
-
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List
ssage.
I looked at the code for the \@@_find_autofonts macro in
fontspec-internal.dtx, but it did not enlighten me.
Maybe I should just not worry...
MWE follows my sig line.
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
---MWE-
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\s
algorithms.
Getting TeX to tell me those Y-positions, as well as the vertical size
of the box, was the difficult part. But maybe I was missing something
obvious?
Mike Maxwell
University of Maryland
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List
On 2018-03-23 16:44, David Carlisle wrote:
there are several ways to get the box output in classic tex (or xetex)
although perhaps the easiest (and safest in terms of not accidentally
affecting the typeset positions) is to use \showoutput so all boxes
are (somewhat verbosely) logged in the log
Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote:
Mike Maxwell wrote:
I can create a minimal example if that would help, but I thought I'd
start with this simple query. Has anyone ever seen anything like this?
Is there more than one copy of the font installed?
Hmm, yes, good point...but removing one didn't solve
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Show also the log-file.
Done, below my signature. This is with the Rupali font.
--
Mike Maxwell
What good is a universe without somebody around to look at it?
--Robert Dicke, Princeton physicist
---Log file
This is XeTeX, Version
Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 4 Jul 2010, at 07:37, Mike Maxwell wrote:
With the non-working fonts, I
also get: - ** WARNING ** Embedding of font
/groups/opt/share/fonts/Rupali_01-02-2007.ttf disabled due to
license restrictions -
That sounds like a pretty important message. Try
(except a space) next to it?
--
Mike Maxwell
What good is a universe without somebody around to look at it?
--Robert Dicke, Princeton physicist
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
code that tags
Bengali text during the conversion from XML to XeLaTeX...
Thanks for all the pointers!
--
Mike Maxwell
What good is a universe without somebody around to look at it?
--Robert Dicke, Princeton physicist
--
Subscriptions
to include a PDF page in the appropriate place.)
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
A library is the best possible imitation, by human beings,
of a divine mind, where the whole universe is viewed and
understood at the same time... we have invented libraries
On 8/28/2010 6:40 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 28.08.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Mike Maxwell:
But what is this command line template the -D option wants?
See here: /usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf/dvipdfmx/dvipdfmx.cfg (or
/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/doc/latex/cjk/doc/pdfhowto/examples
99
Copyright: M.A.Gadir for Sehga Soft. Tel 31 33 99
Am I doing s.t. wrong, or is there a problem with these fonts?
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
A library is the best possible imitation, by human beings,
of a divine mind, where
.
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
A library is the best possible imitation, by human beings,
of a divine mind, where the whole universe is viewed and
understood at the same time... we have invented libraries
because we know that we do not have divine
ought
to be proselytized?
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
A library is the best possible imitation, by human beings,
of a divine mind, where the whole universe is viewed and
understood at the same time... we have invented libraries
because we
articles with good hierarchy although I
used to (before I retired) do all my exams in LaTeX with some custom
macros.
I think you're quite unusual.
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
A library is the best possible imitation, by human beings,
of a divine mind
for statistics, rather than
LuaTeX? Or does LuaTeX allow you to send things to Lua internally?)
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
A library is the best possible imitation, by human beings,
of a divine mind, where the whole universe is viewed and
understood
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
