CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/15 17:38:42
Log message:
303. Fix a typo in the XSetWMProtocols(3) man page (#5697, Alexander Pohoyda).
Modified files:
xc/doc/man/X11/:
XSeWMProt.man
Revision ChangesPath
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/15 17:50:13
Log message:
304. Fill out the sunleo man page (#A.1783, Arnaud Quette).
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/sunleo/:
sunleo.man
Revision
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/15 17:54:00
Log message:
305. Fix missing newline in Message - MessageF transition in dri_glx.c
(#A.1833, Alexander Stohr).
Modified files:
xc/lib/GL/dri/:
dri_glx.c
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/15 20:08:37
Log message:
fix typo
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/mga/:
mga_arc.c
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +2 -2
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/15 20:24:36
Log message:
build fix
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/vfb/:
Imakefile
Revision ChangesPath
3.31 +4 -3
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/15 20:35:16
Log message:
The Noop functions need to be static.
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/mfb/:
mfb.h mfbgc.c
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +1 -35
An alternative would be to update the freetype support in XFree86 mainline,
to the current version.
This would benefit would yield much higher benefit, I think
What caveats would that bring about? What about the development costs?
Daniel schrieb:
Any takers?
This sounds like a bit
Alan Messer writes:
Tim Roberts wrote:
I've recently been made aware of the XFree86 Savage
driver that VIA released
and is now available on Alan Hourihane's web site.
This driver is so much
superior to the one I've been maintaining that I
should be embarrassed.
My
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 1:32 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
[...]
I feel that the fact SharedLibObjCompile() is unused in our _current_ tree
is insufficient reason to remove it.
It provides nothing over and above NormalSharedLibObjCompile which is used.
Maybe I'm wrong...
Nick
Hello,
As per xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/atKeynames.h:
/*
* Fake 'scancodes' in the following ranges are generated for 2-byte
* codes not handled elsewhere. These correspond to most extended keys
* on so-called Internet keyboards:
*
* 0x79-0x93
* 0x96-0xa1
VIA/S3 released fully featured driver that it developed in house. they
were based on 4.2.0. VIA had previously released a 2D only driver for
the CLE266, which was integrated into xfree86 CVS. The released
drivers are available on Alan Cox's website:
http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/S3.zip
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:11, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 01:19 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 11:52, Simon Urbanek wrote:
Summary:
1) CRT + TMDS dual head configuration doesn't work
2)
latest CVS build (by myself) as of yesterday (4.3.99...)
When did you try exactly ? I've seen more fixes for TMDS getting
in the CVS recently. I'm not sure what's up here, definitely not
something the doc explains. I suspect it's the path of pixel
data from the framebuffer to the TMDS
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
[ citation without new stuff ]
Sorry about that, fun time with Evolution. :\
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 4:00 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
[...]
The imake rule in question will not be removed because there is nothing
to preclude its use by external packages such as those found in X.Org's
contrib/.
Ok. Thanks for explaining.
Am I on a road to nowhere in attempting to
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Nick Hudson wrote:
The imake rule in question will not be removed because there is nothing
to preclude its use by external packages such as those found in X.Org's
contrib/.
Ok. Thanks for explaining.
Am I on a road to nowhere in attempting to change the build
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:58:21 -0700 (PDT), Alan Messer wrote:
I've been using the 4.3.99 CLE266 (ProSavage) driver
on my Via EPIA M1 board.
The CLE266 is a Castlerock, not a ProSavage. To the best of my knowledge, the
two chips are unrelated.
--
- Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As far as I know, Microsoft doesn't use bitmap-only sfnts -- they use
scalable fonts throughout, nowadays, only keeping the legacy .FON
format for backwards compatibility.
TR Windows XP still has Terminal, Courier, MS Serif and MS Sans
TR Serif, all of which are bitmapped and in common use.
MLF I think the best thing to do here is to recode DPS to rely on xtrans.
Shall we remove libdps from the tree?
Juliusz
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 15 Jul 2003, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
MLF I think the best thing to do here is to recode DPS to rely on xtrans.
Shall we remove libdps from the tree?
Why? Is DPS dead? It's just a matter of time before I find the time to
convert it. And that doesn't preclude someone else beating me to
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:49:42AM +0200, Daniel Blueman wrote:
An alternative would be to update the freetype support in XFree86 mainline,
to the current version.
I don't know anything about the context of this discussion, but the
XFree86 CVS trunk has FreeType 2.1.4, which appears to be the
This proposal comes up periodically on this and other xfree lists, but
never really goes anywhere. Why not raise money from the open source
community to fund open source driver development? everything from
revamping X (ie, speeding up the development of 5.0 features) to adding
a new Xfree86 3D
This sounds like a great idea indeed. There are many questions, I'm sure.
One that comes to mind is:
*Who* would be able to vote?
Luis
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
This proposal comes up periodically on this and other xfree lists, but
never really goes anywhere. Why not
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
This proposal comes up periodically on this and other xfree lists, but
never really goes anywhere. Why not raise money from the open source
community to fund open source driver development?
It is very difficult to convert money into code. It's
That was the initial plan, but I found out that having FreeType grok
such fonts required more changes than David Turner was wililng to make
in the 2.1.* series. So I'm generating a zero-length glyf and a
one-entry loca. (No EBSC indeed.)
Ok, I'm currently posting a new build of PfaEdit which
An alternative would be to update the freetype support in XFree86 mainline,
to the current version.
This would benefit would yield much higher benefit, I think
What caveats would that bring about? What about the development costs?
Daniel schrieb:
Any takers?
This sounds like a bit
Hi,
Please apply this patch. It fixes two bugs in the ISO-8859-16 and
ARMSCII character set converters. In particular, the draft of
ISO-8859-16 on which the original code is based contained a bug.
Bruno
*** xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/README 2000/02/12 02:54:20 1.1
--- xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/README
Hi,
Please apply this patch. It fixes two bugs in the ISO-8859-16 and
ARMSCII character set converters. In particular, the draft of
ISO-8859-16 on which the original code is based contained a bug.
Commited. Thanks.
--
Ivan U. Pascal | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrator
Hi all,
I have recently had to look into my X server log and found a few
disturbing log messages. It seems like my video card is trying
something it cannot do for a while before giving up. This does explain
the small delay (and blinking) I thought was normal when switsching form
console to X.
Hi,
I am using XFree 4.3 on solaris 9 (intel) with Matrox G450 card.
When I run xdm I have got only black screen.
Thank you for help
Mira
# File generated by xf86config.
#
# Copyright (c) 1999 by The XFree86 Project, Inc.
#
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge,
hi
i'm trying to start x-terminal via etherboot and
ltsp (x-klient 486 dx 66 with tseng et 4000 w32p ,
x-server something better :) but i have some
problem with xfree.
(ww) tseng: no matching device section for instance
(BusID PCI:65:21:0) found
...
fatal server error :
failed to initialize
hi
i'm trying to start x-terminal via etherboot and
ltsp (x-klient 486 dx 66 with tseng et 4000 w32p ,
x-server something better :) but i have some
problem with xfree.
(ww) tseng: no matching device section for instance
(BusID PCI:65:21:0) found
...
fatal server error :
failed to
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003, David A. Mason wrote:
Is it yet possible to use the S-Video out on the i830 chipset in
XFree86?
It certainly works with the i845GE based Shuttle SB51G using the i830
driver. However, I can find now way to get X to use the whole screen.
Using linux the text boot sequence
This is not intended for illegal purposes or to defraud
your cable company.
Your Cable Company will do anything to Keep
you from seeing This.
Access any digital cable signal INSTANTLY.
http://www.directcost.net/index.php?RepID=PW
Due to to high volume of sales traffic this
site may be
Maybe instead of directing them to the email address, you should have a message
directing them to a FAQ / troubleshooting page?
- Christian
From: Egbert Eich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/07/15 Tue AM 08:04:30 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [XFree86] Xpert, Any software just for
Is anyone versed enough in the inner workings of the server and it's libs
to take a stab at this problem?
I'm building xfree86 v4.3.0 under unixware 7.1.3 using the stock cc. When
I get to compling ix86Pci.c in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus I get this error message:
Even if the right directory is in the -I path, is the .c file that requires it perhaps
failing to #include a header that will actually bring in that #define?
- Christian
From: Frank Tarczynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/07/15 Tue AM 09:28:53 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [XFree86]
Interesting. I did copy the header file to the same directory (-I.) but I
never checked to see if it was actually #include'd. Something to check
tonight.
Thanks.
Even if the right directory is in the -I path, is the .c file that
requires it perhaps failing to #include a header that will
Dear Hai,
I have installed RH 7.1 in intel 810 chipset mother
board but I am not able to get X windows. When I try
to configure X window through Xconfigurator it detects
proper intel 810 driver. After finishing Xconfigurator
its suddenly disappeared.
I am getting the Error Message like:
drm:
hi.. I have a Slackware 9 and when trying to initialize KDE the system said
it couldn't find the images.. what can I do?
--
Use o melhor sistema de busca da Internet
Radar UOL - http://www.radaruol.com.br
XFree86.0.log
Description: Binary data
No problem. I'll actually be surprised if this fixes your problem, because this kind
of bug would typically kill everyone regardless of platform.
Still, it's maybe worth checking...
From: Frank Tarczynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/07/15 Tue AM 09:54:33 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
mathias Pragasam [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Kindly give me the direction to solve the problem.
I am waiting for your reply
Can you please post the contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4?
I am quite sure 4.3.0 supports the i810, but with RH 7.1, who
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 02:04:30PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
David Dawes writes:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 05:21:43PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
Whenever the server terminates with a FatalError() it tells the user
to send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This creates an enormous amount of
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Frank Tarczynski wrote:
Is anyone versed enough in the inner workings of the server and it's libs
to take a stab at this problem?
I'm building xfree86 v4.3.0 under unixware 7.1.3 using the stock cc. When
I get to compling ix86Pci.c in
Hi Mark,
Sorry to bother you, but I am still in the mess ! :-(
I made the change you gave me and now I've got another error message !
2) Should I reinstall Xfree ?
I am afreaid that by default, on redhat v80, the installation is made with a
UNIX font (:7100)
Thanks for your help !
Regards,
Hi,
I have a DEC personal workstation 500au with a PCI ATI Mach64 vid card.
I have FreeBSD 4.8 installed with Xfree 4.3.0. Starting X with the
following config file just freezes, and top shows Xfree86 using ~100% of
my CPU. Here's the conifg and the log file(it appears to freeze while
probing
Andy Goth writes:
On Monday, July 14, 2003 10:07 pm, j y wrote:
Thanks, Andy. I got it working now. I found that using chips driver gave
me a double-image problem, but using vesa solved it.
The chips driver is supposed to support hardware acceleration on the ct65548
using the
David Dawes writes:
Has anyone investigated the root cause of why there is no fixed font in
the first place -- like why the font server isn't running? Was it never
started (a vendor-specific configuration problem), or did it crash (a
robustness problem with xfs)?
There seems to be
Moving to 4.3.0 is a show-stopper for me. The log reads No valid mode
found for this DFP/LCD. I have used this config since around 4.0.x
without bigger problems. Now I can get it working only with the VESA
driver, never with Ati or Radeon. I have tried the original ati driver,
the latest DRI
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, David Dawes wrote:
Has anyone investigated the root cause of why there is no fixed font in
the first place -- like why the font server isn't running? Was it never
started (a vendor-specific configuration problem), or did it crash (a
robustness problem with xfs)?
Anyone know why GinGin64 would have problems with Forcing PCIMode with a Radeon
7000. The log shows it looping errors about RADEONCP.
--
Mark Lane, CET mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hard Data Ltd. http://www.harddata.com
T: 01-780-456-9771 F: 01-780-456-9772
11060 - 166 Avenue Edmonton, AB,
gabe--
It's a shot it the dark, but...check to see if your kernel has Radeon
display support enabled.
I encountered the same symptoms running a distribution kernel (Debian
Woody) with a FireGL 1000 Pro Card.
In my case all the virtual consoles went away when _entering_ X with
startx. But
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:30 am, Christian Convey wrote:
What's the best way - just send you XFree86.0.log file resulting from a
vesa run of XF86?
That'll do. I don't care if it's a crash or not. I just want to see the mode
list (plus the rest of the file, if it's convenient).
--
Andy
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:40 am, Egbert Eich wrote:
Andy Goth writes:
From 4.3.0's README.chips, This driver must be considered work in
progress, and those users wanting stability are encouraged to use the
older XFree86 3.3.x versions.
Thanks Andy, this is a pretty lame suggestion.
Hi guys,
I've got Mandrake 9.1 installed, and it's time for me to replace the
installed version of xf86 4.3, with a newer build from xf86's CVS tree.
I had some trouble with the process, so could someone familiar with
Mandrake 9.1 verify that I'm doing it right?
step 1. build xf86's 'xc'
Well, it was working with the ati driver in 4.2.x that came with
OpenBSD 3.2
(should have mentioned the OS). Thanks, though. Actually, the only
reason I went to
the trouble of installing 4.3.0 was to fix this
ghosting/blurring/echoing artifact, which
had nothing to do with the drivers - it was
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:08 am, Nickolay Kolev wrote:
I have recently had to look into my X server log and found a few
disturbing log messages. It seems like my video card is trying
something it cannot do for a while before giving up. This does explain
the small delay (and blinking) I
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:12:35PM -0400, gabe f wrote:
harmful in that it adds traffic to the list? I learn things by hearing
replies that
people might have (inadvertantly) made direct to the author. If the
reply-to
field was not munged people would have to choose to make the
threads
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:10:58PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Andy Goth wrote:
On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 12:05 pm, Egbert Eich wrote:
Daniel Stone writes:
I also hope like hell Mailman isn't munging Reply-To, because that's
just *wrong*.
Hm, I
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 08:36:31PM -0500, Rich Winkel wrote:
Hi, I'm running 4.2.1 under freebsd 4.8. I can run just xf86cfg or startx
with no problem, but running xdm I get:
AUDIT: Thu Jul 10 20:31:47 2003: 2422 X: client 2 rejected from local host
Auth name: MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 ID: -1
Attached is my log file...I am a newbie to linux...I seem to be having
problems in my configuration settings in XF86Config file. The monitor that
I have is a MAGITRONIC and my video card is a Trident. I seem to be able to
run my box in text mode but fail to run in graphical mode.
XFree86
Hi
I am new to Linux and this list.
Recently I installed RedHat Linux 7.1 on my system. Which has following configuration.
RedHat Linux 7.1
AMD Athlon 1800
nVidia GEForce 2MX Video Card
Zenith 753S MOnitor
I tried configure using XConfigurator. I have selected NVIDIA GEForce MX as my display
Are you using gcc 3.3? If so, try compiling with -O, not -O2.
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply. No, it was compiled with gcc 2.95.4 ...
Get this: I have another machine where xdm works fine. It has
the same OS version and exact same X11R6 and local dirs. I copied
/etc and /var from the working
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:43 am, Miroslav Novy wrote:
I am using XFree 4.3 on solaris 9 (intel) with Matrox G450 card.
When I run xdm I have got only black screen.
xdm error (pid 335): Hung in XOpenDisplay(:0), aborting
xdm error (pid 335): server open failed for :0, giving up
xdm error
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:26 pm, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:10:58PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Andy Goth wrote:
On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 12:05 pm, Egbert Eich wrote:
Daniel Stone writes:
I also hope like hell Mailman isn't munging
I'm not sure which version of XFree86 comes with
RedHat 7.1. I assume you say you are unable to configure
XFree86 because startx is not working? If so, we'll need
to see the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file.
Mark.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, kbsgowda wrote:
Hi
I am new to
Attached is my log file...I am a newbie to linux...I seem to be having
problems in my configuration settings in XF86Config file. The monitor that
I have is a MAGITRONIC and my video card is a Trident. I seem to be able
to run my box in text mode but fail to run in graphical mode.
What I
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:58 am, Marek Kopec wrote:
i'm trying to start x-terminal via etherboot and ltsp (x-klient 486 dx 66
with tseng et 4000 w32p , x-server something better :) but i have some
problem with xfree.
(ww) tseng: no matching device section for instance (BusID PCI:65:21:0)
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi.. I have a Slackware 9 and when trying to initialize KDE the system said
it couldn't find the images.. what can I do?
Your log file says:
Parse error on line 279 of section InputDevice in file /etc/X11/XF86Config
Section is
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:13 pm, Christian Convey wrote:
I've got Mandrake 9.1 installed, and it's time for me to replace the
installed version of xf86 4.3, with a newer build from xf86's CVS tree.
Cool. Is there a specific reason why you're upgrading, or do you just want to
see what has
70 matches
Mail list logo
