Re: DPI with multiple heads and virtual desktops

2003-08-20 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Alex Deucher wrote: How is DPI supposed to work if you have a virtual desktop larger than the current mode? the current code seems to produce the wrong DPI. xf86SetDpi() has the following code: if (pScrn-widthmm 0) { pScrn-xDpi = (int)((double)pScrn-virtualX * MMPERINCH

PutImage

2003-08-20 Thread Tan Wei Chong
Dear all, I notice that in Xv PutImage hook, the incoming clipBoxes parameter gives two rectangle coordinates, the first one being the the four corner of the window displaying the video image, the second one (which confused me) being a rectangle from 0,0 (origin of the screen) to the upper

Turning off x86 optimization

2003-08-20 Thread Andras Huszar
Hi list, Are there any possibilities to disable Assembly codes for optimization on x86 architecture before compiling? If yes, how could I do that? Thanks in advance! Cheers, Andras Huszar -- The Adamantix Project Taking trustworthy software out of the labs, and into the real world

Re: DPI with multiple heads and virtual desktops

2003-08-20 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Thomas Winischhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex Deucher wrote: How is DPI supposed to work if you have a virtual desktop larger than the current mode? the current code seems to produce the wrong DPI. xf86SetDpi() has the following code: if (pScrn-widthmm 0) {

Re: XAA and banked memory

2003-08-20 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i found nothing in the mail archive. Does XAA require the linear memory or it can work with the banked memory (64k @ 0xA) on PC in color depth higher than 8bpp? XAA itself doesn't care.

Re: XAA and banked memory

2003-08-20 Thread Egbert Eich
Mark Vojkovich writes: XAA itself doesn't care. You set the LINEAR_FRAMEBUFFER in the XaaInfoRec Flags if you have a linear framebuffer. If you don't set that flag it won't put pixmaps in offscreen memory (because the software rendering code won't be able to deal with them), and it

Re: DPI with multiple heads and virtual desktops

2003-08-20 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Alex Deucher wrote: this is a semi-fix, but it still does not deal with monitors that have different DPI. Perhaps this is something that needs to be looked at for xfree 5. Almost certainly not before XFree86 v5. Even then I don't think a solution to your problem is

Re: PutImage

2003-08-20 Thread Jay Cotton
Hi Wei: I'm not familiar with this API, but I'll bet the second coordinates are for the working surface inside the window. i.e. 0,0x100,100 is the display area inside a 100x100 window that can be placed anywhere on the screen. JC Tan Wei Chong wrote: Dear all, I notice that in Xv

Re: PutImage

2003-08-20 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Tan Wei Chong wrote: Dear all, I notice that in Xv PutImage hook, the incoming clipBoxes parameter gives two rectangle coordinates, the first one being the the four corner of the window displaying the video image, the second one (which confused me) being a rectangle

Re: Turning off x86 optimization

2003-08-20 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Andras Huszar wrote: Hi list, Are there any possibilities to disable Assembly codes for optimization on x86 architecture before compiling? If yes, how could I do that? Thanks in advance! I don't understand the question. Do you mean turn off optimizations? If

Re: Turning off x86 optimization

2003-08-20 Thread Andras Huszar
Hi Mark, I don't understand the question. Do you mean turn off optimizations? If so, copy the xc/config/cf/xf86site.def over to xc/config/cf/host.def (the standard procedure for modifying build parameters. You modify the host.def rather than the xf86site.def). Then, in host.def,

Re: DPI with multiple heads and virtual desktops

2003-08-20 Thread Havoc Pennington
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:02:27AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 09:02, John Meacham wrote: if only there were an extension allowing windows to be migrated between screens by the window manager [...] FWIW, GTK can migrate between displays as of 2.2, I don't know if

[Fonts] MDaemon Notification -- Attachment Removed

2003-08-20 Thread postmaster
The following message contained restricted attachment(s) which have been removed: From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject : Thank you! Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Attachment(s) removed: - movie0045.pi_

[Fonts] Content violation

2003-08-20 Thread US-Symantec_AntiVirus_for_SMTP_Gateways
Content violation found in email message. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] File(s): application.pif Matching filename: *.pif ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts

RE: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-20 Thread Kent Karlsson
Sorry, I meant shift levels. my proposed us-ascii would have just key AE01 { [ 1,exclam ] }; not key AE01 { [ 1, exclam, onesuperior, exclamdown ] }; Sorry for misusing the terminology. But basicaly, this could be done simply without breaking

Re: [I18n] Re: Some thoughts on XKB symbols

2003-08-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 5:04, David Dawes wrote: Or maybe all of the xkb config files can go to a new location outside of xc/programs/xkbcomp. Once there is a good proposal for a more consistent and logical structure for all of these files, they can be moved. That way we don't need to be

[XFree86] please help me..

2003-08-20 Thread Ganesh Prabhu
Dear Sir, I have installed linux9 server installation on pentiumIII machine. It gives error message while starting xserver. I have attached the /var/log/XFree86.0.log and /etc/x11/XF86config file along with this mail. Please guide .. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, Ganesh

[XFree86] Delivery-Report (failure)

2003-08-20 Thread postmaster
This report relates to your message: Your message was not delivered to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the following reason: Unable to transfer Reporting-MTA: x400; /c=NO/admd=TELEMAX/ Arrival-Date: 20 Aug 2003 06:41:42 Z DSN-Gateway: dns; MHNORWAY X400-Conversion-Date: 20 Aug 2003 08:44:15 +0200

[XFree86] Re: Thank you!

2003-08-20 Thread postmaster
Your mail was rejected by the Indigita Mail Server because it contains what looks like a file attachment containing an executable. Because we have users at this site that use Outlook, we cannot allow executables to be sent through email, otherwise we are at high risk for catching an Outlook

[XFree86] switch for twm to KDE???

2003-08-20 Thread Liam Curran
I switch from KDE to twn I need to get it back to KDE please help, im a noob so done skimp on instructions Thanks Kiam

[XFree86] Thank you for your interest in employment opportunities at ThermoFinnigan.

2003-08-20 Thread Jobs - Thermo Finnigan
Title: Thank you for your interest in employment opportunities at Thermo Finnigan. Thank you for your interest in employment opportunities at Thermo Finnigan. We would like to acknowledge receipt of your resume and let you know that it is currently in the review process. Should your

Re: [XFree86] switch for twm to KDE???

2003-08-20 Thread Bharathi S
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Liam Curran wrote: I switch from KDE to twn I need to get it back to KDE edit ~/.Xclient-default # exec twm# Comment it exec startkde # Add this OR use 'switchdesk KDE' command HTH :) -- Bharathi S, IndLinuX Team, (__) DON Lab,TeNeT Group, oo )

[XFree86] Undeliverable E-mail: Thank you!

2003-08-20 Thread postmaster
This e-mail was not delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] due to the detection of one or more viruses. Please consult your local IT service provider for assistance to remove the virus prior to resending the e-mail.

[XFree86] Re: Thank you!

2003-08-20 Thread info
Thank you for contacting Red Hat, Inc. For information on the products and services we provide, please see our Web site: http://www.redhat.com Here you can find anything from Investor relations, Partners and resellers, Education programs, to the Red Hat Store where you can

[XFree86] KB Mapping (Again)

2003-08-20 Thread Bharathi S
Hello All, Is it possible to change the behavier of the KB as follows, Input - Output K - A Ka - B Kaa - C Kaay - CY Mapping Multiple keys to single Glyph/Unicode. I gone thru Xvkb. But it is NOT useful for me. Bcoz I want to input from the KB, Not thru mouse. I also going thru xscope and

[XFree86] Sis 650

2003-08-20 Thread lopez joaquin
Hi! I'm having problems with Xfree86 and maybe someone could help me.I have a Pentium 4 with a graphic card SiS 650 and it seems that Red Hat Linux (7.1) is not compatible with it.(I can't find it in the list of graphic cards)I'm newat linux so I'm not sure if i'm doing something wrong.I

[XFree86] Ecartis command results: -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --

2003-08-20 Thread Ecartis
Please see the attached file for details. Unknown command. --- Ecartis v1.0.0 - job execution complete. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

[XFree86] RE:Re: Wicked screensaver ( Virenlarm !!! Virusalert !!! )

2003-08-20 Thread postmaster
Ihre Email an [EMAIL PROTECTED] enthielt einen Virus und wurde nicht weitergeleitet. Bitte ueberpruefen Sie Ihr System und verstaendigen Sie Ihren Administrator !!! Falls Sie in letzter Zeit keine Mail versendet haben, dann ist ihr Rechner moeglicherweise mit einem Mail-Wurm verseucht und

[XFree86] Sis 650

2003-08-20 Thread Alex Deucher
redhat 7.1 is ancient, I don't think the 650 even existed back then. upgrade to a newer version of redhat. alternatively, you may be able to compile Thomas' driver for 7.1. see here for more info: http://www.winischhofer.net/linuxsisvga.shtml Alex - Hi! I'm having

[XFree86] NAV hat einen Virus in einem Ihrer Dokumente gefunden.

2003-08-20 Thread nt_lns1
Wenden Sie sich an den Systemadministrator. Die infizierte Komponente im geprüften Dokument wurde gelöscht. Virusinformation: Der Anhang movie0045.pif enthielt den Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] und wurde gelöscht. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL

[XFree86] linking with DGA library fails

2003-08-20 Thread Jouni Tulkki
I'm trying to link a program using DGA and I get the following error message: xxx.cc:?: undefined reference to `XF86DGAQueryVersion' I'm linking with -lXxf86dga. Anyone know what to do? ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[XFree86] Notificacion del Server de Email -- Archivo(s) Removidos

2003-08-20 Thread postmaster
El siguiente documento contenia archivos anexos cuyo envio esta restringido por seguridad. Para enviar estos archivos debe comprimirlos en formato .zip y reenviar o si son fotos pegarlas dentro de un documento de word .doc De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto:

[XFree86] What's the matter with the list...

2003-08-20 Thread Lionel Lecoq
In view of the number of firewalls complaints, it looks as if the list was spreading viruses cannot one do something against it? cheers Lionel __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

Re: [XFree86] compile failure on 2.6.0-test3 system.

2003-08-20 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Robin Cook wrote: Well the changes I have had to make so far to try and get xfree86 to compile with linux-2.6.0-test3 are below but I now seem to have run into another problem. And it is listed below the changes made so far. That, I can't help you with. Maybe someone

Re: [XFree86] What's the matter with the list...

2003-08-20 Thread William Gallafent
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Lionel Lecoq wrote: In view of the number of firewalls complaints, it looks as if the list was spreading viruses cannot one do something against it? The latest Outlook virus is using email addresses found in users' systems as 'from' when propagating itself. Can't do

[XFree86] It's me!

2003-08-20 Thread naomi
Title: Untitled Document = Hi there! I've just finnished creating my first site ever! The adress is: http://burningflame.seegoodporn.com Look at it and tell me what u think live using video-chat (from the site) Paula

[XFree86] Re: Re: My details

2003-08-20 Thread support
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AUTO RESPONDER * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Please do not reply to this message, as you will only receive this message again. Thank you for subscribing to Stiffy Productions, we pride ourselves in bringing you the finest in

Re: [XFree86] It's me!

2003-08-20 Thread Ethan Alpert
Title: Untitled Document Ok now this list has problems. Pr0n! Yikes time to unsubscribe I guess. -e

[XFree86] unwanted e-mail

2003-08-20 Thread easton_p
Please remove my address from your automatic e-mail system. Thx ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

Re: [XFree86] Question regarding Xwindow

2003-08-20 Thread Mark Vojkovich
If you want to run many versions of startx simultaneously you need to run each one with a different server number. eg: startx -- :1 startx -- :2 startx -- :3 Without the screen argument it defaults to :0 Mark. On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Anup Mandal wrote: Dear Sir,

[XFree86] [MailServer Notification]To Sender file blocking settings matched and action taken.

2003-08-20 Thread Administrator
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = Kennedy, Ann Subject = Re: Approved Scanning time = 08/20/2003 19:45:51 Action on file blocking: The attachment document_9446.pif matches the file blocking settings. ScanMail has Deleted it.

[XFree86] Re: That movie

2003-08-20 Thread Auto-reply from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be out of my office from 11/8/2003 to 29/8/2003.I'll respond to your message as soon as possible after the 29/8/2003 ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86