update to latest xmail and use filters.in.tab instead
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Henrik Steffen
Geschäftsführer
top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany
http://www.topconcepts.com Tel. +49 4141
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: XMail mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; XMail Announce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: [xmail] 1.16-pre01 ...
Here are the files :
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.16-pre01.tar.gz
~11 hours + ~2000 emails + no user complaints =
it works!
here for ~5 hours on our main server without problems, but as i complained,
the MAPS logging does not work here :-(
-- soenke.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Beau E. Cox wrote:
Hi Davide -
~11 hours + ~2000 emails + no user complaints =
it works!
Yesterday I realized that the documentation is wrong. You used to put the
link syntax L... between a begin html and end html. Older versions
of pod2* used to convert it anyway but
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tracy wrote:
Greetings,
Is there a way to cause XMail to whitelist an IP address or address block
from MAPS/RDNS checking? I've got someone who runs a private mailing list
on their server, but doesn't have reverse DNS set up (actually, they did,
but their ISP messed
At 10:50 6/12/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Is there a way to cause XMail to whitelist an IP address or address block
from MAPS/RDNS checking? I've got someone who runs a private mailing list
on their server, but doesn't have reverse DNS set up (actually, they did,
but their ISP messed it
Hi,
if you are running Xmail on a good machine, such as a P4 with
1gig ram, what can I set to get emails to send quicker? I am running
Windows 2003. No, I can not use Linux.
I thought maybe putting up the number of SMTP threads. Any idea how far
I could put this up to and if it would
I've got 120,000 an hour throughput on Xmail using it as an SMTP relay =
on a 100Mb switched network with a single thread going into it.
If you're getting any less than that then I'd say it was probably =
bandwidth limited.
DAvid
-Original Message-
From: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL
So the amount of threads makes no difference? Might as well not have
then specified in the registry.
Is that 120,000 on a windows system?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Stebbings
Sent: 12 June 2003 16:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep, using Campaign enterprise as the feeder (on win2k) going to xmail =
(on win2k) and relaying to another smtp server (IIS' SMTP on win2k)
Thats not doing any processing on the emails but I reckon any processing =
overhead would be minor compared to IO issues.
For the record microsoft IIS
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, David Stebbings wrote:
Yep, using Campaign enterprise as the feeder (on win2k) going to xmail =
(on win2k) and relaying to another smtp server (IIS' SMTP on win2k)
Thats not doing any processing on the emails but I reckon any processing =
overhead would be minor
AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a slight
headache.
At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6 months
or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet AOL
insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, webmaster wrote:
AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a slight
headache.
At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6 months
or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet AOL
insists on
At 13:59 6/12/2003, webmaster wrote:
[00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are
using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential)
554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this
IP
554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from
Oh, man! Been reading the thread from hell over this on another list.
You have to get your ISP to change your PTR to not look like it belongs
to any sort of cable/dial/dsl connection. They are scanning the PTR
record and claiming that there is no reason for cable/dial/dsl users to
ever directly
how do i go about settting that up?
In smtpgw.tab I did aol.com {tab} cableone.net and also @cableone.net
and mailcableone.net and none worked?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:02 PM
To: Xmail
I checked and I am not on the DNSBL list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
At 13:59 6/12/2003, webmaster wrote:
[00] XMail
Setup xmail to relay @aol.com mail through your cable isp mail server or
through your xmail server at work using smtpfwd.tab. Or use
DefaultSMTPGateways in server.tab to send all your mail to one of the
above servers.
Bill
--
From: webmaster[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June
Here's mine:
aol.com[tab]@mail.myisp.com
cs.com[tab]@mail.myisp.com
netscape.com[tab]@mail.myisp.com
netscape.net[tab]@mail.myisp.com
wmconnect.com[tab]@mail.myisp.com
[newline]
- Original Message -
From: webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003
Yes I was missing the @ sign in front of my isp's mail server. It now
works.
Thanks
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
Date: 12/06/03 10:30
Here's mine:
Hi Guys,
Today one of my clients received this error message:
550 forwarding blocked, read new mail, add 63.118.73.10 to forwarding or
use smtp authentication
Does anyone recognize this? I don't believe this is an XMAIL error message.
Thanks.
Riaz..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Odds are that AOL has subscribed to a DNSBL that lists dynamic IP
addresses, and your IP address is showing up in there. This means that
*nothing* you can do on your end will fix this - your only hope is getting
your ISP to assign you an address which is not listed in whichever DNSBL
that AOL is
Hey Davide,
I know this is rather minor, but I have noticed that if a directory containing a
user's mailbox becomes corrupted or an individual message file becomes corrupted
(error in the file system) under the NT/2K build and XMail tries to access that file
or folder, the entire service
One of the people invloved in the discussion on the other list works for
AOL, and he confirmed it is purely a regex against the PTR record
looking for keywords that indicate dial/dsl/cable users. E.g. if it
contains cm, dsl, pool, dial, etc. anywhere from the third level up
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Riaz wrote:
Hi Guys,
Today one of my clients received this error message:
550 forwarding blocked, read new mail, add 63.118.73.10 to forwarding or
use smtp authentication
Does anyone recognize this? I don't believe this is an XMAIL error message.
No, it's not
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Michael Harrington wrote:
Hey Davide,
I know this is rather minor, but I have noticed that if a directory
containing a user's mailbox becomes corrupted or an individual message
file becomes corrupted (error in the file system) under the NT/2K build
and XMail tries to
Honestly, can you blame AOL for doing this? I can't even count how much
SPAM gets thrown at our system from people using their cable or DSL lines.
The number of messages you stop vs. the number of legitimate email messages
makes the concept seem worth it to me. I'm glad I don't have AOL or
Sorry for the confusion: It's not a specific message, it's the entire
directory or file itself becoming inaccessable due to a corrupted file
system. It didn't create any Dr. Watson dump files otherwise I would send
them to you, but here are the messages reported in the system log but I
don't
At 17:16 6/12/2003, Michael Harrington wrote:
Honestly, can you blame AOL for doing this? I can't even count how much
SPAM gets thrown at our system from people using their cable or DSL lines.
No, I can't blame them for wanting to stop some of the spam. But one of the
best solutions I've seen
I'm not so sure that turning off RDNS for dial-up/dynamic is a good idea.
RDNS checks aren't just used by SMTP relay blockers. For example: until a
few years ago, it was illegal in the United States for a company to export
high encryption (that's a whole other story, though), so download sites
At 18:15 6/12/2003, Kirk Friggstad wrote:
For another example (just discovered this today at
http://www.mynetwatchman.com/kb/security/ports/17/137.htm - scroll down to
the False Positives section at the end) - on a Windows web server, if
Netbios is bound to the public IP address of the server, IIS
What does this mean?
[PeekTime] 1055458949 : Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:02:29 -0400
ErrCode = -56
ErrString = Invalid spool file
Unable to load spool file
\\?\C:\mailroot\spool\20\21\mess\1055458975843.592.linky
SMTP-Error = 554 Error loading spool file
and the spool file:
32 matches
Mail list logo
