Hello,
I understood that if a filter returns 16 the filtering would stop but
all next filters as defined in filters.in.tab are executed.
Can I return a value to XMail that filtering is stopped even if not all
defined filters has run?
--
Groeten,
Peter
Ik ben vrijgezel. Mijn schoonouders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We also have
http://mircea.smartpost.ro/download/courier-imap-crlf.patch.bz2 that is
patch for the Courier-IMAP daemon that make it work with cr/lf
terminated files of Xmail, while this patch is more complex is also
clear what it does and was rejected by Sam of
Davide Libenzi wrote:
1. Can the fix Mircea did for earlier versions be tweaked a little to
work with XMail v1.20? This would be the most simple and quickest
solution at least for me.
Mircea, can you rediff over 1.20?
A while ago I received a diff for 1.20 but the problem with
Jørn Aakre wrote:
Something strange just happened. Just a minute after receiving (my own) post
here with the url Google indexed that particular url. And ONLY that url on
my site.
Is Google subscribing to this list, or what? :)
I just though it was funny. Especially since no other pages
Mircea Ciocan wrote:
So silent !!!
Pong!
--
Groeten,
Peter
The device does not exist.
-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com
- Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org
- ICQ 22383596
- Uptime lindeman.org - 39 days, 4 hours and 4 minutes, 0 users logged in.
-
To
lac wrote:
It's funny that the main reason why I'm running my own mail server is the
spam. I like having a complete control over creating disposable email
accounts. If I buy something from Amazon I create '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
account. When I get spam addressed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' I know
Hello,
Is it somehow possible to set a priority on the task when a filter is
run? This to prevent a sytem becoming unresponsive when a lot off
filters called at the same time.
--
Groeten,
Peter
The port is already open.
-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com
Peter Lindeman wrote:
Is it somehow possible to set a priority on the task when a filter is
run? This to prevent a sytem becoming unresponsive when a lot off
filters called at the same time.
What I could do is call 'renice' from within the filter or is there
better way?
--
Groeten,
Peter
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Memchecker runs now on the main server. I'll let it run until RSS is
40MB.
And then upgrade the server :-)
The problem is that if RSS goes over X, the system just kills XMail process,
no matter if you have 40 MB or GB RAM :/
You must have missed earlier messages of
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
I am looking into making a patch to integrate my leak-tracer in
XMail. It= =20
worked better than valgrind yesterday :-/
That would be great since my XMail installations are still leaking (41MB RSS
now on main server, running since 2004-05-31)
Ran the mem debug
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Ran the mem debug version here for several day and no leaks were
detected!
Memchecker runs now on the main server. I'll let it run until RSS is 40MB.
And then upgrade the server :-)
--
Groeten,
Peter
This message will self-destruct in 10 seconds...
-
- Heb je een
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I think in 1.18 the format of a CTRL command changed. Let me see ... yes,
aliasdomainlist. Maybe this screw up the tool. Pls contact the author.
1.18 still worked with the tool. It stopped from 1.20 (or maybe 1.19 but
I never had 1.19)
--
Groeten,
Peter
Remote PPP
Davide Libenzi wrote:
This sounds like a perfect candidate for the new pre-data SMTP filters.
Any takers?
Me me:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xm-spf.pl
From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF
record made in DNS, if the domain does not have it a mail will
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the
report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the
report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated
the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the
report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the
report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated
the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more
Davide Libenzi wrote:
When will XMail creates the XMail.memleaks file? It is running here now
but the file is not created yet. Will it be created only when a leak is
detected?
Only when it exits.
So when I let it run until, lets say Wednesday orso, then let it stop
with .shutdown it will
Hello,
Is there a possibility (or will there ever be) that a XMail relay server
can somehow have knowledge of users of the main server? We've noticed
the past days that when my server was down for an upgrade the MX server
was flooded with Antivirus emails but most mails were for non existing
Hello,
I just installed XMail on a Mandrake 10 server and after starting XMail
I see just 1 thread in 'ps ax' list
On a Mandrake 9 system I see several threads for XMail running. What can
be the reason for this?
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
Benny wrote:
There is one, tedious, workaround. If you copy/move your message to a
Local Folder than the attachment will open fine. This, I tested, with
Thunderbird 0.5.
Correct, and when you move it then back to the Inbox it stays ok,
strange problem.
--
Groeten,
Peter
File not
Benny wrote:
Hmmm? I have been using the diff with ThunderBird on the Win platform
and so far everything works great. I know thunderbird and mozilla mail
are different projects, but if people want to use Mozilla mail, than
give thunderbird a try.
Configuration:
I am using the
SmartPost wrote:
These patches are available in
smartpost.sourceforge.net/download.php
Just remember that XMail patch (and patched
binary) is
for XMail 1.17
It probably can be implemented for 1.18 manually.
Instruction is available here
Mark Mealman wrote:
A while back Mircea posted a link to a courier-imap patch to fix some
issues that the program has with xmail in the below message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08990.html
But the link to the patch at
Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
Has anyone implemented a filter that strips attachments with specific
extensions such as exe, html, asp, etc.
I am looking for one that I can feed a list of extensions, have those
stripped and the mail message updated to reflect they have been deleted.
I wasn't able
Scott wrote:
I know of a few businesses and gov't mail servers that uses this
strategy in conjuction with a virus scanner. But its not only an aid to
stop viruses, its used to control what type of information is allowed.
no images(probably because of porn), avi, executables, you get the
Davide Libenzi wrote:
XMail 1.18 runs now about a week with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 and the
RSS is about 114MB(!). I think that is _NOT_ normal.
Davide? RSS now 128 MB ;(
Ok, we ran XMail under valgrind, and it did not leak. My RSS on
xmailserver.org never went over 8MB. My suggestion is
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I restartet XMail an hour before midnight - and the logfiles where again
correctly rotated at - i'll have a look what happens in 6
months...
Ok, I know what's going on. Glibc caches the timezone info, so if XMail
started in a non-daylight saving time, it'll keep
:-)
--
Peter Lindeman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mircea Ciocan wrote:
smartpost.ro also ;-) and for this post to not be a complete waste
of bandwitdh here are some announcements for the users of Mandrake Linux
9.2:
Latest pre15 (S)RPMs and latest Courier-imap 3.0.2 ( the version
with ACLs) patched to work smooth together are
Mircea Ciocan wrote:
Can I apply the same source patch to 3.02 as to the previous version to
use it with XMail?
Sure it works for 2.x.y series also.
Ok, thanks, going to try that this weekend!
--
Groeten,
Peter
Loopback detected.
-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk eens op
Davide Libenzi wrote:
J'avoue ne pas m'en rappel=E9, j'ai fait une install temporaire ainsi, =
mais
dans le changelog, il y a :
XMail now uses the name of the executable ( without .exe ) to both =
register
the service name and fetch registry variables.=20
What's this? A message written in
Francesco Vertova wrote:
I'm having a second thought about this. Maybe messages to mailing lists
shouldn't be scanned, since they will be trapped later on by either IO or
OUT filters. Uhmmm ...
Oh, they should: if virus found the message is trashed once for all with no
need to repeat the
Jim Frank wrote:
Do you know how hard it would be to modify your AV script, running in Linux
on xmail 1.17, to allow certain users to have certain preferences? Mainly,
on our heavily used mail server, we have several hundred accounts who wish
to not be notified of any virus attempts to their
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I need testing on this before making an official 1.18-pre15 and 1.18. This
expecially on Unix systems (if running external programs even better):
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre15.tar.gz
Note that I did not receive any feedback from Solaris and BSD-ish
Davide Libenzi wrote:
and a scrambled message again
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] _usr_sbin_ntpdate mail.city-map.de __dev_null.eml
I'm trying locally (xmailserver.org) a pre14. I will post a test-call if
this will result stable in
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I'm trying locally (xmailserver.org) a pre14. I will post a test-call if
this will result stable in calling external programs.
Is it possible that sometimes a mail will disappear with the pre012
version? I noticed sometimes that a mail will not reach the recipient
and
Davide Libenzi wrote:
After that, if testing will go fine, I will make an official pre15 that
will include Win32.
Great, until that I reverted back to 1.17 which was very stable here.
Pre14 is running on xmailserver.org by more than 24 hours with no
problems. I also added a do-nothing
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Well, everybody should post here so xmailserver.org has something to do
for this list :-) That would be a good test ;)
You would SPAM about 500 users doing that :-)
Sometimes a test is needed :-)
BTW the copy of what is running on xmailserver.org is here:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
lindeman.nl now too ;-) If I notice something strange I let you know
I wouldn't want to speak too soon, but the fixed problem was a bitchy
interaction between pthread and fork. You have to be sure to only use
async-signal-safe functions from inside the forked
Davide Libenzi wrote:
What exactly do you mean by only using async-signal-safe functions?
See here:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/fork.html
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/xsh_chap02_04.html
Basically, in a multithreaded program doing
Michael Schwarz wrote:
On my server at business there was three messages with Excel-Files as
attachment wrong. One I can read but not the others, the other files
could nobody open. (The message are split to two or more reciptents
on our ISP-Mailserver, so it arrived at xmail as two or three
on x35.xmailserver.org? It looks like another
spool message orso was appended to this message!
Peter Lindeman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Yes it reached the list, I saw it !!
Here is the header received here :
It also arrived at my system but the message was extended with another
message orso, I have posted it here. It looks like Ecartis is screwing up.
--
Groeten,
Peter
Ooops.
-
- Heb je een
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Yes it reached the list, I saw it !!
Here is the header received here :
It also arrived at my system but the message was extended with another
message orso, I have posted it here. It looks like Ecartis is screwing up.
Do yous till have the *full* message you received
is possbibly going wrong in the
maillist. How can we investigate this further?
Peter
--- end
Peter Lindeman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Messages from the list which never have been delivered from
x35.xmailserver.org to my mailserver. You haven't seen my messages about
it, if so then probably more message are going to /dev/nul
I believe it is ecartis. I have just found 3 ecartis processes stuck doing
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are
you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)?
yes, SA !
Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers. If noone are using
XMail on those system maybe I should remove the
Michail Tchoudinov wrote:
Davide Again I did not see the message below in my mailbox. When I check
the logging of my server I also do not see any connection of
x35.xmailserver.org to my server.
Can anybody on the list show me the headers of the message below so I
can check at what time this
Matic wrote:
bellow is the message source for the mail you wanted
Thanks!
Received: from x35.xmailserver.org (127.0.0.1:33610)
by localhost.localdomain with [XMail 1.18 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
id S10C2F9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:43:19 -0800
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Hello,
It sounds more like a bad line return (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for more
the messages header lines.
rather then xmail not observing the code return of 7.
This is strange, I didn't receive the original message of Beau here in
the list. Is this because
Beau E. Cox wrote:
(2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.63
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Hello,
It sounds more like a bad line return (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for
more the messages header lines.
rather then xmail
I resend the message below to the list because I did not get it myself
from the list. As I check my logs here it was sended. This is what is in
the smail log file :
lindeman.nl 1079275079528.3561499.server.lindeman.org S4358C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP
Davide Libenzi wrote:
This is strange, I didn't receive the original message of Beau here in
the list. Is this because 1.18pre09 is running here or another problem?
Boy, I don't know. I did one 'radical' change on Thur night:
upgraded my Linux kernel from 2.4.25 to 2.6.4. But my origional
1.18
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Are you guys able to replicate an off-line XMail setup identical to the
one you are using? To setup a trivial test suite that sends a burst of
messages to an account an cross-check them. Yesterday I was using this to
feed messages to my test XMail setup:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I cannot setup an extra test identical to what I am running very soon. I
will try pre 10 on my server and continue testing.
It seems that the problem was triggered by SA. I had a filter yesterday
that was simulating message change (rc 7), and it was working fine
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Good Morning (it's early at GMT+10 ;) ),
Just installed pre10 and am logging in debug mode.
Will try to force a test as above.
=46rom looking at overnight messages, it seems that the problem,
once triggered, persists. All messages good until about 3am local then
bad until
Davide Libenzi wrote:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
Running pre07 since last night. Is there is problem with filter
return code 7 (message changed)? It looks like messages are not
recognized as changed after running throught sa_filter.pl for
spamc in SpamAssassin 2.63.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
pre08 is definitly *not* working correct here. When I send a message it
goes through 2 filters here, after that the message should be delivered.
but this version does not deliver the message, it stays somewhere
When I
Davide Libenzi wrote:
My own AV filter and SpamAssassin filter by Don Drake. I can see that
the AV filter has allready run because it adds a header to the message
and this is added . What extra info do you want to have?
Are you using address masks different from 0.0.0.0/0 ?
An XMail debug
Davide Libenzi wrote:
No all entrances are for 0.0.0.0/0 but I have some entrances for several
emailadresses and some entrances for mail from specified email adresses.
You are asking for info during a debug run, but when I use debug info
(-Md parm) it works so what can I do exactly?
This
Davide Libenzi wrote:
No all entrances are for 0.0.0.0/0 but I have some entrances for several
emailadresses and some entrances for mail from specified email adresses.
You are asking for info during a debug run, but when I use debug info
(-Md parm) it works so what can I do exactly?
This
Davide Libenzi wrote:
the line Mail was allready scanned comes out of my filter so that is
correct.
Can I do some more research ?
Mind giving this one a shot:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre09.tar.gz
The first test messages did come through ;-)
--
Groeten,
Peter
If God
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Mind giving this one a shot:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre09.tar.gz
The first test messages did come through ;-)
I am trying to simulate multiple Perl script filters on my test machine,
and messages are correctly processed with pre09:
SMTP client
Davide Libenzi wrote:
pre 09 is now also running on my system and messages are coming in. Did
you find the problem then in pre08 why it probably wasn't working here?
It looks like :-) (missed signal handling)
Well, get back to work to finish IMAP then ;-)
--
Groeten,
Peter
WinErr: 01A
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Well, get back to work to finish IMAP then ;-)
Since this is an extremely critical component, I'd really like more
reports and testing. I still did not hear anything from BSD and Solaris
folks ...
Well I'll keep it running here, if I notice anything strange I let you
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is the 1.18-pre06:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre06.tar.gz
I really need this to be tested on all Unix-based systems, expecially the
ones using heavy external programs like filters, mailproc-external, etc...
Are there specific things to look
Bowen Moursund wrote:
# Should the script send an email to the postmaster of the server
our $send_to_postmaster =3D 1;
This is typically no good, either. Unless a routine is
implemented that
looks up the appropriate email domain, all this does is notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought that sent
Nick Marino wrote:
Yes, it ranks on the top of the list. I am using it on my windows and it
allways cacthes the viruses even the new ones.
It is a commercial one and I don't have access to a full version so I
cannot implement it in the AV filter.
There is a trial version.
Correct, but
Eric Murphy wrote:
-
--- AV Filter 1.8 for XMail (http://www.lindeman.org/filters.html)
You are supposingly using an old version of the AV filter. This version
(and older ones) contains a bug which can slow down your server
Sasa Stupar wrote:
Has anyone tried or know how to get Nod32 to work with Peters AV
filter? Or Know of any links that have info about it?
What is Nod32? New virusscanner?
Well its not new... been around for years, ranked pretty high on the virus
orginizations lists... can see and read about it
Nick Marino wrote:
Has anyone tried or know how to get Nod32 to work with Peters AV filter?
Or Know of any links that have info about it?
What is Nod32? New virusscanner?
--
Groeten,
Peter
addresses.
-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com
- Kijk ook op
Dale Qualls wrote:
Here's what I'm seeing in the debug:
SMAIL local SMTP =3D therootdomain.org From =3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO =
=3D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP client exit (12.blah.blah.blah)
Use of unitialized value in numeric eq (=3D=3D) at /var/MailRoot/filters/ch=
eckvirus.pl line 142.
Dale Qualls wrote:
It's ver 1.9.
It's still catching virii just fine though Peter.
But these msg's should not be there so something is wrong. Can you send
me your checkvirus.cfg?
--
Groeten,
Peter
What did you say your (l)user name was...? ;-)
-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk
Dale Qualls wrote:
Here you go, thanks!!
I now see immediatly what is wrong. Here a smaal example from your cfg file.
# Here you enter the dir of where the executable of McAfee is.
# our $mcafee_dir = /usr/local/uvscan/;
# if 0 McAfee will be disabled.
# our $enable_mcafee_scan = 1;
You have
Gideon So schreef:
You can sometime see this message in debug mode but this is not a problem.
Do you have ClamAV installed, then you will see this message.
I see. I am using ClamAv. Thanks Peter. But seems that after scan a
few messages then xmail stops.
After restart Xmail, the
Hello Gideon So,
I have a problem like this:
Xmail works extremely fine most of the time. It's great. Only when I
send an e-mail with attachment to multiple recipients, it stops. I read
the
debug message and seems that it stops after the Av-filter from Peter
Lindemaninvolved.
Michail Tchoudinov schreef:
Couerier IMAP passwords are being changed well by Squirrel trough IMAP
protocol. It works fine even the Courier is authorized against SQL.
But Squirrel does know nothing about XMail.
The better solution is SmartPost www.smartpost.ro
I have looked at Smartpost
Tracy schreef:
Can anyone post the link to 1.18? I accidentally deleted the mail that had
it in it, and I can't seem to find it in the list archives
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18.tar.gz
--
Groeten,
Peter
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
-
- Heb je een
Hello,
Did anybody in the past allready made a module for changing XMail and
Courier password from within SquirrelMail?
--
Groeten,
Peter
No asynchronous net available.
-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com
- Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org
- ICQ
Dale Qualls schreef:
Is there a limit to the number of times the av-filter can be called and =
will mail bypass it if it's busy or runs out of threads?
In the last couple of days we've have many copies of mydoom get through to =
the user (where the desktop AV stopped it) but we're still
Davide Libenzi schreef:
Thanks Peter. Can you try to give it another try by fetching at the same
link?
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18.tar.gz
I did the same tests again with this version and until now it looks ok.
I will keep it running on my server for a while. Also starting and
Davide Libenzi schreef:
I put here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18.tar.gz
a snapshot of 1.18. It would be great if Unix users running external
command processing (filters, etc...) could give it a spin and let me know.
I have given it a try tonight but it is not working correctly
Davide Libenzi schreef:
I put here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18.tar.gz
a snapshot of 1.18. It would be great if Unix users running external
command processing (filters, etc...) could give it a spin and let me know.
Is there anything special what needs testing/attention?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
I have the following line
our $xmail_version = 116;
Please run XMail in debug mode and send me the output when you send a
(test)virus to an account. Then it is easier to say what is the cause of
the problem.
--
Groeten,
Peter
All programmers are playwrights
Davide Libenzi schreef:
Is there anything special what needs testing/attention?
Looking if external commands execute correctly w/out timeouts for example.
Ok, will try it here tommorow night!
--
Groeten,
Peter
Biplex port is initializing. Wait a few seconds and redial.
-
- Heb je een
Dale Qualls schreef:
Perfectly clear. I have to assume that it failed the first time and I =
didn't notice it.
I installed it on a box in the office I'm in now and it worked just fine. =
I'm just going to scrap that other box and rebuild from scratch.
It appears to work just fine here.
Filip schreef:
BTW, why not use the XMail sendmail so as to avoid all the fuss
about Sendmail.pm ? Your program could send mail just making system
calls to sendmail.sh, am'I wrong ?
PL Because now I can completely right a correct message in Perl in the
PL script.
Sorry, English not
Hello,
Today I have released the new version (1.9) of my AV filter for XMail
The problem where the AV filter did not exit and was consuming a lot of
CPU load is fixed. Therefore it is highly recommended to upgrade to this
version if you are using this filter since the bug is there since 1.4
Dale Qualls schreef:
Thanks much!
Can I run that line from the startup script so logging is always enabled? =
Can you give me any tips on how to do so?
Those switches are invaluableI'll keep a note of them, that's for =
sure.
I appreciate all of the help!
You can just run
Davide Libenzi wrote:
can you give some details about the next release?
What can we expect ? :)
1) IMAP
2) Calendar
3) UUCP support
4) Integrated AV
5) Integrated SPAM filters
6) Integrated auto-reply
7) Integrated parental control
Only one of the above is true. Guess? :-)
I hope 7
Toby Reiter wrote:
All (esp Peter),
I don't know if this is a known fact already, or not, but I didn't
start having problems with the av script until I upgraded to the most
recent version. The previous version worked flawlessly. This is on
XMail 1.16.
Overall I was VERY pleased with
Benny wrote:
The only other information that might help is that I am using ClamAV and
ONLY clamav for my virus scanning. Plus, the only other filter I am using
is the SpamAssassin filter. I have the SpamAssassin filter running first
and then Peter's AV script. These filters are running for
Toby Reiter wrote:
I thought the version I had that worked was the 1.0 version, but I
guess that's probably wrong. Which was the first version to support
clamAV?
In 1.7 I had added ClamAV support
--
Groeten,
Peter
--
What the hell!?
---
--- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
--- Kijk eens op
Benny wrote:
Ok guys... let me know if any of you have seen this or tried this. I took
the process that was running in limbo and ran it from command. All the
sudden the below message kept on repeating. I had to press CTRL+C to stop
it.
Here is my command and the output:
COMMAND
Toby Reiter wrote:
Overall I was VERY pleased with the performance of the script when I
had it installed.
With what version did you never saw this problem?
Peter,
If I had to guess it would be 1.7. Did 1.7 support clamAv?
Yep, that is the first version with ClamAV support. Another
Kirk Friggstad wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any pattern to the failures on our system -
sometimes the system will run fine for 24 hours or more without any hanging
filters, and then suddenly 3 or 4 of them will hang within the span of 10
seconds. We do not have any other filters running on
Kirk Friggstad wrote:
I'd be more than willing to put a debug version of your script in place on
my server - we have this problem pretty regularly (i.e. at least once every
24-48 hours), I've got lots of disk space for logging debug messages, and
I'd love to see this problem disappear. Would
Nick Marino wrote:
The less confusion the better
Then the filter will fail if you use new version! Better read the doc
of what all items mean.
Why will it fail if all the 116 are changed in all the files to 117?
Explain to me how it will cause it to not run as long as you change them in
Nick Marino wrote:
Due to a mistake of mine I did not put the correct archive online. Now I
have put 1.8 online and is ready for download.
If this is the updated version why in the perl script and cfg file it only
refers to version 116 of xmail?
Just trying to make sure I am downloading
Peter Lindeman wrote:
You can find it at http://www.lindeman.org/filters.html
Due to a mistake of mine I did not put the correct archive online. Now I
have put 1.8 online and is ready for download.
18-11-2003 Version 1.8
- If ClamAV scanned the message and found a virus the virusname
Rodolfo Schwarzenberg K. wrote:
You can also use this one I found at
http://xmail.libre-essai.com/XM_Fprot_FilterEn.html which I'm using it
right now. It works fine, and installation is troublefree. I personally
never got Peter Lindeman's script to work properly. I found the
installation
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
