On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Yes. Tollef's opinion was that quitting was a copout and that I should
instead go fix
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Yes. Tollef's opinion was
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:24:24AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:19:09AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
All arguments were made, extensively, before.
Except maybe for one:
The claimed reason for
Patch #268 - 2011/02/10
* fix an inconsistency of the Enable Reverse Video checkbox in the
VT Options menu. This also removes a special case added in patch
#217 which limited the effect of the reverseVideo resource (Debian
#603808).
Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be writes:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote:
Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be writes:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:43:07PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Feb
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:47:25AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
If you actually wanted to find out, you could go ask someone,
First the following question needs to be answered: who owns (not pw0wn,
we found that out already) these machines, who is paying for their
power/net?
The X.org
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:02:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:47:25AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
If you actually wanted to find out, you could go ask someone,
First the following question needs to be answered: who owns (not pw0wn,
we found that out already)
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:44:05PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:02:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:47:25AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
If you actually wanted to find out, you could go ask someone,
First the following question needs to
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:01:01PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:44:05PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:02:56PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:47:25AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
If you actually wanted to find out,
On 02/10/11 07:07 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
It seems that a useful and representative X.org board is needed, and
that their primary responsibility should be the funding and maintenance
of dependable infrastructure for the free software projects on both
x.org and fd.o.
Hey, what do you
On 11-02-09 02:21 PM, matti christensen wrote:
well - this is Firefox 3.6.9 and it does not work after triplecheck /mc
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.x.org%2Freleases%2Fcurrent%2Fdoc%2Fman%2Fman5%2Fxorg.conf.5.xhtmlcharset=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=Inlinegroup=0
X Window system 's Developer
hello, I am fond of X Window system.
Now I want to use the X Window to make virtual Keyboard , and
used the libXtst libarary to do the key event, used XKeysymToKeycode
function to
get Keycode.
when XkbLayout is jp, XkbModel is pc104, XkbRules is xorg, it is OK, it
is
I've got a Barco monitor that I'm using the touch screen configuration. I've
got a couple of questions concerning the configuration:
1. The xorg.conf was setup to use the evdev driver and it's working.
But I'm not sure how the startup of X is calling this driver? I do not see
with
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:25:21AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 02/10/11 07:07 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
It seems that a useful and representative X.org board is needed, and
that their primary responsibility should be the funding and maintenance
of dependable infrastructure for the
3.6.13 works ok.
Do you have problems with any other pages or just that one?
Matt
On 02/09/2011 12:21 PM, matti christensen wrote:
well - this is Firefox 3.6.9 and it does not work after triplecheck /mc
Quoting Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com:
On 02/ 9/11 05:38 AM, matti
On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Can someone look at
http://fm.no-ip.com/Tmp/Linux/Xorg/xorg.0.log-gx260-i845G-os114rc1-1024x768x096
and tell me what in there actually tells me which video driver got used (via
auto-configure/no mention of Intel/VESA/FBDEV in xorg.conf)? The
On Feb 10, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Johnson, Je wrote:
I’ve got a Barco monitor that I’m using the touch screen configuration. I’ve
got a couple of questions concerning the configuration:
1. The “xorg.conf” was setup to use the “evdev” driver and it’s
working. But I’m not sure how the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:25:21AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 02/10/11 07:07 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
It seems that a useful and representative X.org board is needed, and
that their primary responsibility should be
Je == Johnson, Je je.john...@lmco.com writes:
Hi,
Je I?ve got a Barco monitor that I?m using the touch screen
Je configuration. I?ve got a couple of questions concerning the
Je configuration:
Out of interest, what monitor is this?
Je 1. The ?xorg.conf? was setup to use the ?evdev?
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:39:54AM -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
So it is better to leave this current situation as is, and have a major
part of the infrastructure that X.org and others depend on what i
honestly cannot
On 02/10/11 11:14 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:39:54AM -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Luc Verhaegenl...@skynet.be wrote:
So it is better to leave this current situation as is, and have a major
part of the infrastructure that X.org and
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:43 +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org 2011-02-09 06:36:31
PST ---
done
Root access restored, i presume?
Luc Verhaegen.
Luc,
I'm sure you would be welcome to leave the community if this bothers
you. I for one am
From: Justin Dou justin@intel.com
The calling for allocate_or_reuse_buffer may fail due to some reason, e.g. out
of memory.
If the buffers[] were not initialized to be NULL, the following err_out may try
to access an illegal memory, which will cause X crash afterward.
Reviewed-by: Kristian
xkbcomp is executed by the X server when loading or switching keyboard
layouts to compile the XKB keyboard configuration data files into the binary
format that the X server reads.
This release allows the uploading of keymaps per-keyboard using the -i flag
(which wasn't hooked up to anything
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Isn't libreoffice using fd.o?
They at least use wiki space there, though I think their main website
is elsewhere now.
Hi,
yes, we're happy users of git, mailing list, and bugzilla. Wiki -
not so much (some pages left, I guess).
But you're right, that's another
On 2011/02/10 12:41 (GMT-0500) Adam Jackson composed:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Can someone look at
http://fm.no-ip.com/Tmp/Linux/Xorg/xorg.0.log-gx260-i845G-os114rc1-1024x768x096
and tell me what in there actually tells me which video driver got used (via
Thanks Peter...
John
-Original Message-
From: Peter Korsgaard [mailto:jac...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Korsgaard
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Johnson, Je
Cc: x...@freedesktop.org
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Driver Question - evdev
Je == Johnson, Je je.john...@lmco.com
27 matches
Mail list logo
