Roland Mainz wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
take 5000 snapshots its his
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:34:30PM -0700, Jeff Victor wrote:
* When you share a ZFS fs via NFS, what happens to files and
filesystems that exceed the limits of NFS?
What limits do you have in mind? I'm not an NFS expert, but I think
that NFSv4 (and probably v3) supports
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
Mark Shellenbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes we do need something like this.
This is already covered by the following CRs 6280676, 6421209.
These RFE's are currently being investigated. The basic idea is that
an adminstrator will be allowed to grant specific users/groups to
Rainer Orth wrote:
Mark Shellenbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes we do need something like this.
This is already covered by the following CRs 6280676, 6421209.
These RFE's are currently being investigated. The basic idea is that
an adminstrator will be allowed to grant specific
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 12:22, James Dickens wrote:
how about changing the name of the file to uid or username-filename
this atleast gets you the ability to let each user the ability to
delete there own file, shouldn't be much work. Another possible
enhancement would be adding anything field in
Hello Phil,
Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 7:28:51 PM, you wrote:
PC Will the ability to import a destroyed ZFS pool and the fsstat
PC command that's part of the latest Solaris Express release (B38)
PC make it into Solaris 10 Update-2 when it's released in
PC June/July??? Also has any decision been
I said I had several questions to start threads on
What about ZFS and various HSM solutions? Do any of them already work
with ZFS? Are any going to? It seems like HSM solutions that access
things at a file level would have little trouble integrating with ZFS.
But ones that work at a
It doesn't sound like they want to use filesystem-mgmt tools, they want to use
per-file tools. Wouldn't pax (or cpio) be a better tool to do these things?
Scott Dickson wrote:
A customer asked today about the ability to snapshot and rollback
individual files. They have an environment where
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:43:54PM -0400, Scott Dickson wrote:
I said I had several questions to start threads on
What about ZFS and various HSM solutions? Do any of them already work
with ZFS? Are any going to? It seems like HSM solutions that access
things at a file level would
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 12:34:45PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Where does the 12.5% compression rule in zio_compress_data() come from ?
Given that this is in the generic function for all compression
algorithms rather than in the implementation of lzjb I wonder where the
number comes from ?
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 9:42:06 PM, you wrote:
SD How does (or does) ZFS maintain sequentiality of the blocks of a file.
SD If I mkfile on a clean UFS, I likely will get contiguous blocks for my
SD file, right? A customer I talked to recently has a desire to access
SD large
12 matches
Mail list logo
