On 12/5/06, Bill Sommerfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 13:56 -0500, Krzys wrote:
mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 34.4M - 151G -
mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 141K - 189G -
mypool2/d3 492G 254G 11.5G legacy
I am so confused with all of
dudekula mastan wrote:
5) Like fsck command on Linux, is there any command to check the
consistency of the ZFS file system ?
As others have mentioned, ZFS doesn't require off line consistency
checking. You can run 'zpool scrub' on a live system and check the
result with 'zpool
dudekula mastan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) On Linux to know the presence of ext2/ext3 file systems on a device we
use tune2fs command. Similar to tune2fs command is there any command to know
the presence of ZFS file system on a device ?
2) When a device is shared between two
Le 04/12/2006 à 23:34:39-0800, Jason A. Hoffman a écrit
Hi Mastan,
Like this , Can We share zfs file system between two machines. If
so please explain it.
It's always going from machine 1 to machine 2?
zfs send [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] | zfs
recv
Hi Albert,
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 14:16 +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
It's possible to configure the server, the high level raid array, and the
pool of my old array raid to do :
1/ When the server read/write he do from high level raid
2/ The server make a copie of all data from high
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 14:56 +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
That's impressive. Whath the size of the file you send throught ssh ? Is
that size is exactly same of the FS or the occupation of FS ? Can I send
just the diff ? For example
At t=0 I send a big file using your command
How about attaching the slow storage and kick off a
scrub during the nights ? Then detach in the morning ?
Downside: you are running an unreplicated pool during the
day. Storage side errors won't be recoverable.
-r
Albert Shih writes:
Le 04/12/2006 à 21:24:26-0800, Anton B. Rang a écrit
is there any command to know the presence of ZFS file system on a device ?
fstyp is the Solaris command to determine what type of file system may be
present on a disk:
# fstyp /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s6
zfs
When a device is shared between two machines [ ... ]
You can use the same mount/unmount
But it's still not the application's problem to handle the underlying
device failure.
But it is the application's problem to handle an error writing to the file
system -- that's why the file system is allowed to return errors. ;-)
Some applications might not check them, some applications
ok, two weeks ago I did notice one of my disk in zpool got problems.
I was getting Corrupt label; wrong magic number messages, then when I looked
in format it did not see that disk... (last disk) I had that setup running for
few months now and all of the sudden last disk failed. So I ordered
Thanks, ah another wird thing is that when I run format on that frive I get
a coredump :(
format
Searching for disks...
efi_alloc_and_init failed.
done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c1t0d0 SEAGATE-ST337LC-D703 cyl 45265 alt 2 hd 16 sec 809
/[EMAIL
Krzys wrote:
Thanks, ah another wird thing is that when I run format on that
frive I get a coredump :(
Run pstack /path/to/core and send the output.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
[12:00:40] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /d/d3/nb1 pstack core
core 'core' of 29506: format -e
- lwp# 1 / thread# 1
000239b8 c_disk (51800, 52000, 4bde4, 525f4, 54e78, 0) + 4e0
00020fb4 main (2, 0, ffbff8e8, 0, 52000, 29000) + 46c
000141a8 _start (0, 0,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Krzys wrote:
Thanks, ah another wird thing is that when I run format on that frive I
get
a coredump :(
... snip
Try zeroing out the disk label with something like:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/c?t?d?p0 bs=1024k count=1024
Regards,
Al Hopper Logical Approach
Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Krzys wrote:
Thanks, ah another wird thing is that when I run format on that frive I
get
a coredump :(
... snip
Try zeroing out the disk label with something like:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/c?t?d?p0 bs=1024k
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Krzys wrote:
Thanks, ah another wird thing is that when I run format on that frive
I get
a coredump :(
... snip
Try zeroing out the disk label with something like:
Does not work :(
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/c3t6d0s0 bs=1024k count=1024
dd: opening `/dev/rdsk/c3t6d0s0': I/O error
That is so strange... it seems like I lost another disk... I will try to reboot
and see what I get, but I guess I need to order another disk then and give it a
try...
Chris
So the questions are:
- is this fixable? I don't see an inum I could run
find on to remove,
and I can't even do a zfs volinit anyway:
nextest-01# zfs volinit
cannot iterate filesystems: I/O error
- would not enabling zil_disable have prevented
this?
- Should I have
Ok, so here is an update
I did restart my sysyte, I power it off and power it on. Here is screen capture
of my boot. I certainly do have some hard drive issues and will need to take a
look at them... But I got my disk back visible to the system and zfs is doing
resilvering again
Rebooting
Jeremy Teo wrote:
On 12/5/06, Bill Sommerfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 13:56 -0500, Krzys wrote:
mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 34.4M - 151G -
mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 141K - 189G -
mypool2/d3 492G 254G 11.5G legacy
I am so
Anyone have any thoughts on this? I'd really like to
be able to build a nice ZFS box for file service but if
a hardware failure can corrupt a disk pool I'll have to
try to find another solution, I'm afraid.
Sorry, I worded this poorly -- if the loss of a disk in a mirror
can corrupt the
What os is this?
What is the hardware?
can you try running format with efi_debug set. You have to run format using a
debugger and patch the variable. Here is how using mdb (set a break point in
main so that the dynamic linker has done it's stuff, then update the value of
efi_debug to be 1,
So ZFS should be more resilient against write errors, and the SCSI disk or
FC drivers
should be more resilient against LIPs (the most likely cause of your
problem) or other
transient errors. (Alternatively, the ifp driver should be updated to
support the
maximum number of targets on a
Hmm... I just noticed this qla2100.conf option:
# During link down conditions enable/disable the reporting of
# errors.
#0 = disabled, 1 = enable
hba0-link-down-error=1;
hba1-link-down-error=1;
I _wonder_ what might possibly happen if I change that 1 to a 0 (zero)... :-)
This message
This looks more like a cabling or connector problem. When that happens
you should see parity errors and transfer rate negotiations.
-- richard
Krzys wrote:
Ok, so here is an update
I did restart my sysyte, I power it off and power it on. Here is screen
capture of my boot. I certainly do
BTW, there is a way to check what the SCSI negotiations resolved to.
I wrote about it once in a BluePrint
http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0500/sysperfnc.pdf
See page 11
-- richard
Richard Elling wrote:
This looks more like a cabling or connector problem. When that happens
you should see
On 12/5/06, Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... I just noticed this qla2100.conf option:
# During link down conditions enable/disable the reporting of
# errors.
#0 = disabled, 1 = enable
hba0-link-down-error=1;
hba1-link-down-error=1;
This is the driver the we are using in this
Hm. If the disk has no label, why would it have an s0?
Or, did you mean p0?
Nathan.
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 04:45, Krzys wrote:
Does not work :(
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/c3t6d0s0 bs=1024k count=1024
dd: opening `/dev/rdsk/c3t6d0s0': I/O error
That is so strange... it seems like I
Quoth Thomas Garner on Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:15PM -0500:
I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system.
If I buy 2 more disks and put them into a raid-z'ed zfs under solaris,
is there a generally accepted way to build an degraded array with the
2 disks, copy the
So there is no current way to specify the creation of a 3 disk raid-z
array with a known missing disk?
On 12/5/06, David Bustos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Thomas Garner on Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:15PM -0500:
I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system.
If I buy
Jim,
I'm not at all sure what happened to your pool.
However, I can answer some of your questions.
Jim Hranicky wrote On 12/05/06 11:32,:
So the questions are:
- is this fixable? I don't see an inum I could run
find on to remove,
I think the pool is busted. Even the message printed in your
You specify the mirroring configuration. The top-level vdevs are implicitly
striped. So if you, for instance, request something like
zpool create mirror AA BA mirror AB BB
then you will have a pool consisting of a stripe of two mirrors. Each mirror
will have one copy of its data at each
I think the pool is busted. Even the message printed in your
previous email is bad:
DATASET OBJECT RANGE
15 0 lvl=4294967295 blkid=0
as level is way out of range.
I think this could be from dmu_objset_open_impl().
It sets object to 0 and level to -1 (=
Creating an array configuration with one element being a sparse file, then
removing that file, comes to mind, but I wouldn't want to be the first to
attempt it. ;-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
34 matches
Mail list logo
