Hi all,
i am about to put together a one month test configuration for a
graphics-production server (prepress-filer that is). I would like to test zfs
on a x4200 with two sas2sata-jbods attached. Initially i wanted to use an
infortrend fc2sata-jbod-enclosure but these are at out of production
http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x4200/optioncards.jsp#m2pcie
SG-XPCIE8SAS-E-Z ?
On 9/13/07, Thomas Liesner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
i am about to put together a one month test configuration for a
graphics-production server (prepress-filer that is). I would like to test zfs
on a
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:58:10AM +, Marc Bevand wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek pjd at FreeBSD.org writes:
This is how RAIDZ fills the disks (follow the numbers):
Disk0 Disk1 Disk2 Disk3
D0 D1 D2 P3
D4 D5 D6 P7
D8 D9
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:49:36AM +0200, Louwtjie Burger wrote:
http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x4200/optioncards.jsp#m2pcie
SG-XPCIE8SAS-E-Z ?
I believe that's one of the LSI 1068E based cards. From what I've been
able to tell, anything based on the 106x chipset will work. That's what
After having to replace an internal raid card in an X2200 (S10U3 in
this case), I can see the disks just fine - and can boot, so the data
isn't completely missing.
However, my zpool has gone.
# zpool status -x
pool: storage
state: FAULTED
status: One or more devices could not be opened.
Hi all,
I'm putting together a OpenSolaris ZFS-based system and need help
picking hardware.
I'm thinking about using this 26-disk case: [FYI: 2-disk RAID1 for the
OS 4*(4+2) RAIDZ2 for SAN]
http://rackmountpro.com/productpage.php?prodid=2418
Regarding the mobo, cpus, and memory - I
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would know if this is just an accounting-type
error with the recorded version= stored on disk, or if there
are/could-be any deeper issues with an upgraded zpool?
I created a pool under a Sol10_x86_u3 install (11/06?), and zdb correctly
reported the pool as a
Paul Armor wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would know if this is just an accounting-type
error with the recorded version= stored on disk, or if there
are/could-be any deeper issues with an upgraded zpool?
I created a pool under a Sol10_x86_u3 install (11/06?), and zdb correctly
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Paul Armor wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would know if this is just an accounting-type
error with the recorded version= stored on disk, or if there are/could-be
any deeper issues with an upgraded zpool?
I
I have created a script that gets a snapshot and backs the snapshot to
tape. I would like to keep the snapshot around for one week, than
destroy it using the following command:
zfs destroy snapshotlvolume.
Is there a way to automate the destroying of snapshots that are older
that x
Hi Joe,
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:39 -0400, Poulos, Joe wrote:
Is there a way to automate the destroying of snapshots that are older
that x amount of days?
Yeah, a few people have done stuff like this.
Chris has this:
http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/entry/a_faster_zfs_snapshot_massacre
and
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:54:41AM -0600, Lori Alt wrote:
In-place upgrade of zfs datasets is not supported and probably
never will be (LiveUpgrade will be the way to go with zfs because
the cloning features of zfs make it a natural). But the LiveUpgrade
changes aren't ready yet, so for the
Try exporting the pool then import it. I have seen this after moving disks
between systems, and on a couple of occasions just rebooting.
On 9/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:19:02 +0100
From: Peter Tribble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [zfs-discuss]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I gather about the East Texas venue they tend to repeatedly
dismiss very competent technical testimony (prior art/non-infringement) --
instead relying more on the lawyer's arguments, lay conjecture and soft
fact. This seems to be why the venue is so
On 9/13/07, Solaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try exporting the pool then import it. I have seen this after moving disks
between systems, and on a couple of occasions just rebooting.
Doesn't work. (How can you export something that isn't imported
anyway?)
--
-Peter Tribble
have you tried zpool clear?
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 9/13/07, Solaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try exporting the pool then import it. I have seen this after moving disks
between systems, and on a couple of occasions just rebooting.
Doesn't work. (How can you export something that
On 9/13/07, Mike Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you tried zpool clear?
Not yet. Let me give it a try:
# zpool clear storage
cannot open 'storage': pool is unavailable
Bother...
Thanks anyway!
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 06:36:33PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
Doesn't work. (How can you export something that isn't imported
anyway?)
The pool is imported, or else 'zpool status' wouldn't show it at all.
It's just faulted. So when you say doesn't work, does that mean that
the zpool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
# zpool clear storage
cannot open 'storage': pool is unavailable
Bother...
Greetings,
It looks to me like maybe the device names changed with the controller
swap you mentioned. Possibly the new device has not been fully
recognized by the OS yet. Maybe a cfgadm -al
Ok, I guess I misunderstood the status of your pool. If you can do a zpool
status then your zpool is configured, and should be exportable, even if the
pool is inoperable, right? If you do a zpool status and it says no pools
available (just like the zpool import command you had shown), then my
On 9/13/07, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 06:36:33PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
Doesn't work. (How can you export something that isn't imported
anyway?)
The pool is imported, or else 'zpool status' wouldn't show it at all.
It's just faulted. So when
zpool import -a -f should do the trick
On 9/13/07, Peter Tribble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 06:36:33PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
Doesn't work. (How can you export something that isn't imported
anyway?)
Sun Fire 280R
Solaris 10 11/06, KU Generic_125100-08
Created a ZFS pool with disk c5t0d5, format c5t0d5 shows the disk is
part of a ZFS pool.
Then ran format=partition=modify and was able to change the partition
for it. This
resulted in panic and crash when a zpool status was run. From what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad Plecs wrote:
I ended up going back to rsync, because we had more and more
complaints as the snapshots accumulated, but am now just rsyncing to
another system, which in turn runs snapshots on the backup copy. It's
still time- and
On 9/13/07, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:54:12PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
There must be a better way of handling this. It should have just
brought it online first time around, without all the fiddling around
(that feels like voodoo to me).
Yes, the
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:54:12PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
Hm. I tried this earlier, and it didn't work. (Pretty much the first thing
I tried). Something like 'no such pool' when I tried the export.
However, I just tried again and it worked. But I have been poking at it and
it's had a
Louwtjie Burger wrote:
http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x4200/optioncards.jsp#m2pcie
SG-XPCIE8SAS-E-Z ?
On 9/13/07, Thomas Liesner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, i am about to put together a one month test configuration for a
graphics-production server (prepress-filer that is). I would
I'm trying to add filesystems from two different pools to a zone but can't seem
to find any mention of how to do this in the docs.
I tried this but the second set overwrites the first one.
add dataset
set name=pool1/fs1
set name=pool2/fs2
end
Is this possible or do I need to use different
On 9/13/07, Brian Hechinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:54:41AM -0600, Lori Alt wrote:
In-place upgrade of zfs datasets is not supported and probably
never will be (LiveUpgrade will be the way to go with zfs because
the cloning features of zfs make it a natural).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm trying to add filesystems from two different pools to a zone but can't
seem to find any mention of how to do this in the docs.
I tried this but the second set overwrites the first one.
add dataset
set name=pool1/fs1
set name=pool2/fs2
end
Is this possible
Marion Hakanson wrote:
You need two separate dataset declarations:
add dataset
set name=pool1/fs1
end
add dataset
set name=pool2/fs2
end
Duh... makes sense.
Thanks Marion!
-Robert
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 9/12/07, Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 02:24:56PM -0700, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:41:24PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I'm a bit surprised by these results. Assuming relatively large blocks
written, RAID-Z and RAID-5
Hi All,
Here's a synopsis of my morning:
23:43:17 suzi:~ $ fmdump
TIME UUID SUNW-MSG-ID
Sep 13 05:40:06.2394 5ad39b52-c2e7-6d53-b937-d43694ed2568 ZFS-8000-GH
Sep 13 05:50:05.5643 14d37f29-d93d-ef9d-d699-d617dc65b44c ZFS-8000-GH
Sep 13 05:50:05.8213
Hi
I know ZFS was designed to work as a you do not need to know FS and for
JBOD disks, but sometimes we need to know where we have redundancies and
sometimes we do use HDS or EMC arrays.
I have a large costumer that needs to ensure redundancies between sites.
This means ensuring that data from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Duh... makes sense.
Oh, I dunno, I think your first try makes sense, too. That's what
I tried to do my first time out. Maybe the zones team will get
around to supporting multiple datasets in one clause someday
Regards,
Marion
Caveat: do not enable nonvolatile write cache for UFS.
Correction: do not enable *volatile* write cache for UFS :-)
--
Dan.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
I will only comment on the chassis, as this is made by AIC (short for
American Industrial Computer), and I have three of these in service at
my work. These chassis are quite well made, but I have experienced the
following two problems:
1) The rails really are not up to the task of supporting
37 matches
Mail list logo
