Dickon Hood writes:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 13:14:56 +, I wrote:
: On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:58:17 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
: : Dickon Hood wrote:
: : On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:38:11 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
: : : Dickon Hood wrote:
: : : We're seeing the writes
Based on recommendations from this list, I asked the company that built
my box to use an LSI SAS3081E controller.
The first problem I noticed was that the drive-numbers were ordered
incorrectly. That is, given that my system has 24 bays (6 rows, 4
bays/row), the drive numbers from
Hi Kent,
I'm one of the team that works on Solaris' mpt driver, which we
recently enhanced to deliver mpxio support with SAS. I have a bit
of knowledge about your issue :-)
Kent Watsen wrote:
Based on recommendations from this list, I asked the company that built
my box to use an LSI SAS3081E
[0] andromeda:/2common/sge# wc /etc/dfs/sharetab
18537412 157646 /etc/dfs/sharetab
This machine (Thumper) currently runs Solaris 10 Update 3 (with some patches)
and things work just fine. Now, I'm a bit worried about reboot times due to the
number of exported filesystems and I'm thinking
Wow, how fortunate for me that you are on this list!
I guess I do have a follow-up question... If each new drive gets a new
id when plugged into the system - and I learn to discover that drive's
id using dmesg or iostat and use `zfs replace ` correctly - when a
drive fails, what will it
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:27:56 +0100, Roch - PAE wrote:
: O_DSYNC was good idea. Then if you have recent Nevada you
: can use the separate intent log (log keyword in zpool
: create) to absord thosewrites without having splindle
: competition with the reads. Your write
Hi Paul,
Already in my LSI Configuration Utility I have an option to clear the
persistent mapping for drives not present, but then the card resumes its
normal persistent-mapping logic. What I really want is to disable to
persistent mapping logic completely - is the `lsiutil` doing that for
Hi Kent:
I have run into the same problem before, and have worked with LSI and SUN
support to fix it. LSI calls this persistant drive mapping, and here is how
to clear it
1) obtain the latest version of the program lsiutil from LSI. They don't
seem to have the Solaris versions on their
Hi Kent:
What the lsiutil does for me is clear the persistent mapping for all
of the drives on a card. I don't know of a way to disable the mapping
completely (but that does sound like a nice option). Since SUN is
reselling this card now (that is how I got my cards), I wonder if they
(apologies if this gets posted twice - it disappeared the first time, and it's
not clear whether that was intentional)
Hello can,
Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 6:57:43 PM, you wrote:
Monday, December 10, 2007, 3:35:27 AM, you wrote:
cyg and it
made them slower
cyg That's the second
Hello can,
Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 6:57:43 PM, you wrote:
Monday, December 10, 2007, 3:35:27 AM, you wrote:
cyg and it
made them slower
cyg That's the second time you've claimed that, so you'll really at
cyg least have to describe *how* you measured this even if the
cyg detailed
James C. McPherson wrote:
Now here's where things get murky.
At this point in time at least (it may change!) Solaris' mpt
driver uses LSI's logical target id mapping method. This is
*NOT* an enclosure/slot naming method - at least, not from the
OS' point of view. Additionally, unless you're
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:22:07AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
For Sun systems, we have 3 LEDs on the drives:
1. Ready to remove (blue)
2. Service required (amber)
3. OK/Activity (green)
So there must be a way to set the ready to remove LED from Solaris.
In the old days, we could use
I can't find how to do this...I used a disk for a zfs pool and now I
want to use it for normal UFS stuff. But my partition table now looks like:
Part TagFlag First SectorSizeLast Sector
0usrwm34 33.91GB 71116541
1
Hi Doug,
ZFS uses an EFI label so you need to use format -e to set it back to a
VTOC label, like this:
# format -e
Specify disk (enter its number)[4]: 3
selecting c0t4d0
[disk formatted]
format label
[0] SMI Label
[1] EFI Label
Specify Label type[1]: 0
Warning: This disk has an EFI label.
Hello can,
I haven't been wasting so much time as in this thread... but from time
to time it won't hurt :)
More below :)
Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 4:46:42 PM, you wrote:
Hello Bill,
I know, everyone loves their baby...
cyg No, you don't know: you just assume that everyone is as biased
Hello zfs-discuss,
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6604198-1
Is there a patch for S10? I thought it's been fixed.
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://milek.blogspot.com
On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6604198-1
Is there a patch for S10? I thought it's been fixed.
It was fixed via 6460622 zio_nowait() doesn't live up to its name
and that is in s10u4.
...
Bill - I don't think there's a point in continuing
that discussion.
I think you've finally found something upon which we can agree. I still
haven't figured out exactly where on the stupid/intellectually dishonest
spectrum you fall (lazy is probably out: you have put some effort in to
Look, it's obvious this guy talks about himself as if he is the person
he is addressing. Please stop taking this personally and feeding the troll.
can you guess? wrote:
Bill - I don't think there's a point in continuing
that discussion.
I think you've finally found something upon
On November 29, 2007 5:56:04 AM -0800 MP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Intel show a configuration of this chassis in the Hardware Technical
Specification:
http://download.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/ssr212mc2/sb/ssr212
mc2_tps_12.pdf
without the RAID controller. I assume that then the
What are the approaches to finding what external USB disks are currently
connected? I'm starting on backup scripts, and I need to check which
volumes are present before I figure out what to back up to them. I
suppose I could just try all the ones that I know about and see which
are there
I'm trying to build a simple Solaris 10 file server using ZFS + CIFS... That
means I don't need X Windows or anything like that, etc.
During the Solaris 10 installation I chose the Core Group for the
installation so that it doesn't install all of the extra software associated
with the other
John Klimek wrote:
I'm trying to build a simple Solaris 10 file server using ZFS + CIFS...
That means I don't need X Windows or anything like that, etc.
Answered elsewhere.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
