My impression is not that other OS's aren't interested in ZFS, they
are, it's that the licensing restrictions limit native support to
Solaris, BSD, and OS-X.
If you wanted native support in Windows or Linux, it would require a
significant effort from Sun.
Why is that a problem for Windows?
Hello all..
I did some tests to understand the behaviour of ZFS and slog (SSD), and for
understand the workload i did implement a simple software to visualize the data
blocks (read/write).
I'm posting here the link in the case somebody wants to try it.
http://www.eall.com.br/blog/?p=906
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:28 PM, David Abrahams d...@boostpro.com wrote:
FWIW, I managed to build a source merge of the solaris grub-0.97 (with
ZFS capability) and ubuntu's latest copy of grub-0.97 (with whatever
patches they've backported into it). The sources are available at
Some people use ZFS and HardWare raid. The recommended is to use only ZFS and
HW raid.
What are the advantages/disadvantages? Should you use a HW raid in conjunction
with ZFS, if possible? Or only ZFS? Which is best?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Eric D. Mudama edmud...@bounceswoosh.org wrote:
My impression is not that other OS's aren't interested in ZFS, they
are, it's that the licensing restrictions limit native support to
Solaris, BSD, and OS-X.
The BDF folks had some cons against the CDDL but after I had a lobger
discussion with
my post was not to start a discuss gplcddl.
It just an idea to promote ZFS and OPENSOLARIS
If it was against anything than against exfat, nothing else!!!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Hi all,
I have 2 questions about ZFS.
1. I have create a snapshot in my pool1/data1, and zfs send/recv it to
pool2/data2. but I found the USED in zfs list is different:
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
pool2/data2 160G 1.44T 159G /pool2/data2
pool1/data 176G
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Some people use ZFS and HardWare raid. The recommended is to use only ZFS and
HW raid.
What are the advantages/disadvantages? Should you use a HW raid in
conjunction with ZFS, if possible? Or only ZFS? Which is best?
There are many paths to the top of the mountain.
Fabian Wörner fabian.woer...@googlemail.com wrote:
my post was not to start a discuss gplcddl.
It just an idea to promote ZFS and OPENSOLARIS
If it was against anything than against exfat, nothing else!!!
If you like to promoote ZFS, you need to understand why the party you like
to
I just put in a (low priority) bug report on this.
Ben
This post from close to a year ago never received a
response. We just had this same thing happen to
another server that is running Solaris 10 U6. One of
the disks was marked as removed and the pool
degraded, but 'zpool status -x' says
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Fabian Wörner fabian.woer...@googlemail.com wrote:
my post was not to start a discuss gplcddl.
It just an idea to promote ZFS and OPENSOLARIS
If it was against anything than against exfat, nothing else!!!
If you like to promoote ZFS, you need to understand why
Is there a simple way to convert subdirectories in a ZFS pool into data
sets?
thanks,
-dave
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:14:09PM -0500, David Briand wrote:
Is there a simple way to convert subdirectories in a ZFS pool into data
sets?
An inefficient and complicated, but fast way is to snapshot and clone
the dataset containing the directory in question, then remove everything
from the
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:14:09PM -0500, David Briand wrote:
Is there a simple way to convert subdirectories in a ZFS pool into data
sets?
An inefficient and complicated, but fast way is to snapshot and clone
the dataset containing the
Try setting the cachemode property on the target filesystem.
Also verify that the source can pump data through the net at the
desired rate if the target is /dev/null.
-r
Le 8 janv. 09 à 18:46, gnomad a écrit :
I have just built an opensolaris box (2008.11) as a small fileserver
(6x 1TB
Le 4 janv. 09 à 21:09, milosz a écrit :
thanks for your responses, guys...
the nagle's tweak is the first thing i did, actually.
not sure what the network limiting factors could be here... there's
no switch, jumbo frames are on... maybe it's the e1000g driver?
it's been wonky since
Nicolas Williams wrote:
It'd be awesome to have a native directory-dataset conversion feature
in ZFS. And, relatedly, fast moves of files across datasets
in the same
volume. These two RFEs have been discussed to death in the list; see
the archives.
This would be a nice feature to have.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:59:10PM -0500, Moore, Joe wrote:
Nicolas Williams wrote:
It'd be awesome to have a native directory-dataset conversion feature
in ZFS. And, relatedly, fast moves of files across datasets
in the same
volume. These two RFEs have been discussed to death in the
[having late lunch hour for beloved Orvar]
one more baby scenario for your consideration --
you can give me some ZFS based codes and I will go to china and burn some HW
RAID ASICs to fulfill your desire?
best,
z
- Original Message -
From: Richard Elling richard.ell...@sun.com
To:
In the last few weeks, I've seen a number of new NAS devices released
from companies like HP, QNAP, VIA, Lacie, Buffalo, Iomega,
Cisco/Linksys, etc. Most of these are powered by Intel Celeron, Intel
Atom, AMD Sempron, Marvell Orion, or Via C7 chips. I've also noticed
that most allow a maximum of 1
i'm not sure how many via chips support 64-bit, which seems to be
highly recommended.
atoms seem to be more suitable.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Joe S js.li...@gmail.com wrote:
In the last few weeks, I've seen a number of new NAS devices released
from companies like HP, QNAP, VIA, Lacie,
[having good long lunch...]
did you do ZFS on your huge PC?
try that first, and then please ask again - will run OpenSolaris?
You don't run things on NAS boxes, you attach things to them.
best,
z at lunch
- Original Message -
From: Joe S js.li...@gmail.com
To:
I've got a server at home that I'm about to set up. I'll be moving 3x 500GB
SATA
disks into it from a different machine, so the config of those is set. What I
need
help with is the other disks. I'm not sure what the best way to use them is.
I want to do ZFS Boot, so I'm limited to what
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote:
try that first, and then please ask again - will run OpenSolaris?
You don't run things on NAS boxes, you attach things to them.
These NAS devices need an OS. They come preinstalled with Windows Home
Server. I would like
a, I see.
did you ever think about using game boxes for your home digital media
storage?
can be very fun!
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/support/hardware/memoryupdate/default.htm
best,
z
- Original Message -
From: Joe S js.li...@gmail.com
To: JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com
Cc:
Hi
Updated today from snv 101 to 105 today. I wanted to do zfs send/receive to a
new zpool while forgetting that the new pool was a newer version.
zfs send timed out after a while, but it was impossible to kill the receive
process.
Shouldn't the zfs receive command just fail with a wrong
Hi
It would be also nice to be able to specify the zpool version during pool
creation. E.g. If I have a newer machine and I want to move data to an older
one, I should be able to specify the pool version, otherwise it's a one-way
street.
zpool create -o version=xx ...
Mike
On 12-Jan-09, at 3:43 PM, JZ wrote:
[having late lunch hour for beloved Orvar]
one more baby scenario for your consideration --
you can give me some ZFS based codes and I will go to china and
burn some HW
RAID ASICs to fulfill your desire?
Is that what passes for product development
Not really.
In chinatown, we are trying to do some ZFS home based NAS, no need to burn
anything.
best,
z
- Original Message -
From: Toby Thain t...@telegraphics.com.au
To: JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com
Cc: Richard Elling richard.ell...@sun.com; Orvar Korvar
So
after a short time of silence
i took some hours to have a look over the plain disks...
So first of all:
The Data seems still to be there!!! :-) i can identify it by some file
headers.
So i am currently doing some testing within a VMSetup.
After that i will try to scan my
Ahh.
what a relief, knowing the baby data could be ok... best wishes!
I am going for some seafood dinner now.
cheers,
z
- Original Message -
From: Philipp Haußleiter phil...@haussleiter.de
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:45 PM
Subject: Re:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Brian Hechinger wo...@4amlunch.net wrote:
I've got a server at home that I'm about to set up. I'll be moving 3x 500GB
SATA
disks into it from a different machine, so the config of those is set. What
I need
help with is the other disks. I'm not sure what
tt == Toby Thain t...@telegraphics.com.au writes:
j == JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com writes:
Nobody in their right mind is using Gentoo.
tt a lot of seasoned sysadmins would disagree.
Gentoo makes sense for embedded projects. OpenWRT is arguably
source-based too. but Gentoo
js == Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de writes:
js A GPLd ZFS would however disallow to use it on *BSD and Mac OS
js X.
and also Solaris. which is why ZFS would not be GPL'd that way. It'd
be a choice of license. I think someone floated the same either/or
license as
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 04:55:15PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
Hi Brian,
I tried running with one 146Gb 15k SAS disk for Zil and a 2nd
(identical) disk for L2ARC and it turns out to be a bad use of that
hardware. Bad is a highly subjective assessment, based on the type
of workload you're
js == Joe S js.li...@gmail.com writes:
m == mike mike...@gmail.com writes:
j == JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com writes:
js Marvell Orion,
I think Orion is MIPS.
I heard the new Orion will have crypto acceleration though. maybe
keep an eye on it, and think of running openwrt there
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Fabian Wörner fabian.woer...@googlemail.com wrote:
my post was not to start a discuss gplcddl.
It just an idea to promote ZFS and OPENSOLARIS
If it was against anything than against exfat, nothing else!!!
If you like to
Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of
pop tarts and pancake mix. -- IRC User (http://www.bash.org/?841435)
but who sends a baby to do groceries? can't pick up the wine for daddy.
and which
Richard Elling wrote:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Fabian Wörner fabian.woer...@googlemail.com wrote:
my post was not to start a discuss gplcddl.
It just an idea to promote ZFS and OPENSOLARIS
If it was against anything than against exfat,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Miles Nordin wrote:
but yeah, that OTness aside, Sun's deliberately crafting their brand
new CDDL license to be incompatible with the GPL isn't exactly in the
spirit of free software. BSD is also not in the GPL camp, but the
mainstream of BSD has altered their licenses
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Joe S js.li...@gmail.com wrote:
In the last few weeks, I've seen a number of new NAS devices released
from companies like HP, QNAP, VIA, Lacie, Buffalo, Iomega,
Cisco/Linksys, etc. Most of these are powered by Intel Celeron, Intel
Atom, AMD Sempron, Marvell
Hi B,
You are not out eating seafood tonight?
For real? the cost thing... I will take your words for it.
And I will tell my chinatown folks maybe stop doing the ZFS home NAS, but
try the new Windows Home thing...
And those folke, they eat more fried rice, not seafood, and some are the 佛
(fo)
Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
Le 4 janv. 09 à 21:09, milosz a écrit :
thanks for your responses, guys...
the nagle's tweak is the first thing i did, actually.
not sure what the network limiting factors could be here... there's
no switch, jumbo frames are on... maybe it's the e1000g driver?
it's
ok, was I too harsh on the list?
sorry folks, as I said, I have the biggest ego.
no one can hurt that by trying to fight me, but yes, it can be hurt if I
have to hurt the friends I love in protecting my ego or my other friends'
ego.
but no one can get hurt if we don't claim what we have or
Some additional info:
I'm using the default port 3260 and native iscsitgt (not Comstar). What other
details would you like? Im running OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86
Thinkpad T60p laptop with 3GB of memory, a 2.1Ghz core duo proc, with 2 500gb
mirriored USB drives. I did notice that when
Meh -
I doubt you hurt anyone. Most people have kill files for that sort of
stuff. heh. ;)
On the 'which if these should work' sort of question, if you do happen
to try any of those systems, and they work, remember to submit the
details to the HCL. :)
I'm keen to give it a whack on a small
My home NAS box, that I'd upgraded to Solaris 2008.11 after a series of
crashes leaving the smf database damaged, and which ran for 4 days
cleanly, suddenly fell right back to where the old one had been before.
Looking at the logs, I see something similar to (this is manually
transcribed to paper
Hi Experts,
IHAC who using Solaris 10 + ZFS,two questions they're concerned:
- ZIL(zfs intent log) is enabled by default for ZFS,there are varied
storage purchased by customer(such as EMC CX/DMX series,HDS AMS/USP
series and etc),customer wonder whether there is any impact to these
storages if
any idea what could cause my system to panic? I get my system rebooted daily at
various times. very strange, but its pointing to zfs. I have U6 with all latest
patches.
Jan 12 05:47:12 chrysek unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice]
Jan 12 05:47:12 chrysek ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=30002c8d4e0:
Jan 12
On 01/12/09 20:45, Simon wrote:
Hi Experts,
IHAC who using Solaris 10 + ZFS,two questions they're concerned:
- ZIL(zfs intent log) is enabled by default for ZFS,there are varied
storage purchased by customer(such as EMC CX/DMX series,HDS AMS/USP
series and etc),customer wonder whether
M wrote:
Thanks for the response Richard.
That won't fix it... whatever it is. You're losing the net and you
need to solve that problem first. I'd check /var/adm/messages file
and see if there is anything unusual, then fmdump -eV, looking for
clues.
I don't see anything in the messages
This is a known bug:
6678070 Panic from vdev_mirror_map_alloc()
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6678070
Neil.
On 01/12/09 21:12, Krzys wrote:
any idea what could cause my system to panic? I get my system rebooted daily
at
various times. very strange, but its pointing to zfs.
52 matches
Mail list logo
