Hello, some time ago I've seen the existence of development ISOs
of OpenIndiana dubbed build 151. How close or far is it from the
sol11ex 151a? In particular, regarding ZFS/ZPOOL version and
functionality?
Namely, some people on the list report having problems with their
pools built on zpoolv28,
On 07/19/11 12:03, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello, some time ago I've seen the existence of development ISOs
of OpenIndiana dubbed build 151. How close or far is it from the
sol11ex 151a? In particular, regarding ZFS/ZPOOL version and
functionality?
Solaris 11 Express (snv_151a) has the following
Ok, I went with windows and virtualbox solution. I could see all 5 of my raid-z
disks in windows. I encapsulated them as entire disks in vmdk files and
subsequently offlined them to windows.
I then installed a sol11exp vbox instance, attached the 5 virtualized disks and
can see them in my
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Brett repudi...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I went with windows and virtualbox solution. I could see all 5 of my
raid-z disks in windows. I encapsulated them as entire disks in vmdk files
and subsequently offlined them to windows.
I then installed a sol11exp vbox
root@san:~# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c7t6d0s0
cannot open '/dev/rdsk/c7t6d0s0': I/O error
root@san:~# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c7t6d0p1
LABEL 0
failed to unpack label 0
LABEL 1
Could you try to just boot up fbsd or linux on the box to see if zfs (native or
fuse-based, respecively) can see the drives?
roy
- Original Message -
root@san:~# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c7t6d0s0
cannot open '/dev/rdsk/c7t6d0s0': I/O error
root@san:~# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c7t6d0p1
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am using S11E, and have created a zpool on a single disk as storage. In
several directories, I can see a directory called .$EXTEND/$QUOTA. What is
it for? Can I delete it?
--
Perhaps this is of help.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 06:44:25PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
It would be really
nice if the aclmode could be specified on a per object level rather than
a per file system level, but that would be considerably more difficult
to achieve 8-/.
If there were an acl permission for set
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
Now that illumos has restored the aclmode option to zfs, I would like to
revisit the topic of potentially expanding the suite of available modes.
[...]
At one point, I was experimenting with some code for smbfs that would
