, as everone who has seen cluttered
desktops full of downloaded files can probably confirm.
Cheers,
Constantin
--
Constantin Gonzalez Schmitz, Sales Consultant,
Oracle Hardware Presales Germany
Phone: +49 89 460 08 25 91 | Mobile: +49 172 834 90 30
Blog: http://constantin.glez.de
way to do that is run a scrub-like process and
build up a table of files and their blocks.
Cheers,
Constantin
--
Constantin Gonzalez Schmitz | Principal Field Technologist
Phone: +49 89 460 08 25 91 || Mobile: +49 172 834 90 30
Oracle Hardware Presales Germany
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. Co. KG
/
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologist Blog: constantin.glez.de
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 Twitter: @zalez
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, 85551 Kirchheim
://www.opensolaris.org/
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologist Blog: constantin.glez.de
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 Twitter: @zalez
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee
://www.opensolaris.org/
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologisthttp://blogs.sun.com/constantin
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://google.com/search?q=constantin+gonzalez
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH
://www.opensolaris.org/
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologisthttp://blogs.sun.com/constantin
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://google.com/search?q=constantin+gonzalez
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH
Cheers,
Constantin
--
Sent from OpenSolaris, http://www.opensolaris.org/
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologisthttp://blogs.sun.com/constantin
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://google.com/search?q
appears to have fixed the problem. I have been
abusing the box for a couple of weeks without any lockups. Roll on
update 8!
Was that IDR140221-17? That one fixed a deadlock bug for us back
in May.
--
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal
Cryptographic Framework:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crypto/inprogress/padlock/
Cheers,
Constantin
--
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologisthttp://blogs.sun.com/constantin
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25
voltage yields far greater savings than a lower frequency. In
september I'll do a post about the afore mentioned M4A boards and an lsi sas
controller in one of the pcie x16 slots.
--
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologist
filesystem basis is only the second best solution, but
since that CR already exists, it seems to be the more realistic route.
Thanks,
Constantin
--
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologisthttp
Hi,
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Neil Perrin wrote:
On 10/22/08 10:26, Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
3. Disable ZIL[1]. This is of course evil, but one customer pointed out to
me
that if a tar xvf were writing locally to a ZFS file system, the writes
wouldn't
list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologisthttp://blogs.sun.com/constantin
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http
Hi,
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
Yes, we're both aware of this. In this particular situation, the customer
would restart his backup job (and thus the client application) in case
the
server dies.
So it is ok for this customer if their backup
/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine
[2]: http://blogs.sun.com/perrin/entry/slog_blog_or_blogging_on
--
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Principal Field Technologisthttp://blogs.sun.com/constantin
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://google.com
Hi,
great, thank you. So ZFS isn't picky about finding the target fs already
created and attributed when replicating data into it.
This is very cool!
Best regards,
Constantin
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
Hi Darren,
thank you for the clarification, I didn't know
recompression, en/decryption, change of attributes at the dataset level,
etc.
No need this already works this way.
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25
Hi Paul,
# fdisk -E /dev/rdsk/c7t0d0s2
then
# zpool create -f Radical-Vol /dev/dsk/c7t0d0
should work. The warnings you see are just there to double-check you don't
overwrite any previously used pool which you may regret. -f overrules that.
Hope this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin
,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1
is the secret?
Paul
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems
.
I've written a script to do all of this, but it's only works on my system
certified.
I'd like to get some feedback and validation before I post it on my blog,
so anyone, let me know if you want to try it out.
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun
. If you're interested, let me know.
Hope this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin
.
Kinda like playing Tetris with RAID-Z...
Later, I decided using just paired disks as mirrors are really more
flexible and easier to expand, since disk space is cheap.
Hope this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform
,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, 85551
this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH
.
There are also some new ZFS slides that go with it, also in german.
Let me know if you have any suggestions.
Hope this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de
and the reboot, but is there anything else?
- Did someone already blog about this and I haven't noticed yet?
Cheers,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49
http://blogs.sun.com/timh/entry/friday_fun_with_bfu_and
lori
Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
Hi,
I'm a big fan of live upgrade. I'm also a big fan of ZFS boot. The
latter is
more important for me. And yes, I'm looking forward to both being
integrated
with each other.
Meanwhile, what
moment in time.
Or did you mean send -r?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http
user and not
a Sun employee.
So, again, thank you so much ZFS team and keep up the good work!
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4
regards and again, congratulations to the ZFS boot team!
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com
pool is brand new and I'm scrubbing it as we speak.
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http
be the better way of implementing
5097228 in the first place?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91
. Compression is turned on on
both pools. The source pool has been scrubbed on Monday with no known
data
errors and the destination pool is brand new and I'm scrubbing it as
we speak.
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH
with lshal
3. Set up an fdi file that matches the disks and tells hal to ignore them
The naming of the file
/etc/hal/fdi/preprobe/30user/10-ignore-usb.fdi
sounds like init.d style directory and file naming, ist this correct?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin Gonzalez
Hi Mark,
Mark J Musante wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
Has anybody tried it yet with a striped mirror? What if the pool is
composed out of two mirrors? Can I attach devices to both mirrors, let
them resilver, then detach them and import the pool from those?
You'd
.
Cheers,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH
tell rmvolmgr that a particular set of disks belongs
to ZFS and should not be treated as removable?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49
and for reads (assuming a data disk
is broken)? This data would be useful when arguing for a software RAID
scheme in front of hardware-RAID addicted customers.
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global
is the cheapest. Therefore it's best to sacrifice
space and you'll get better availability and better performance.
Hope this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http
it.
But maybe someone from the ZFS team can clarify this.
Cheers,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http
than what I have now. This would cost me the one SATA
drive I'm using now in a smaller pool.
Rob T
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Constantin Gonzalez
incremental snapshot then zfs set mountpoint=x to the new
filesystem, then bring up the services again.
Hope this works as I imagine.
Cheers,
Constantin
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
What is the most elegant way of migrating all filesystems to the new
pool,
including snapshots
, then run a send (-i) orgy?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/
Sitz d. Ges
blocks would be transferred as they are, including all embedded snapshots.
Is that already an RFE?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49
this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/
Sitz d. Ges.: Sun Microsystems GmbH
bye
christian
Artem Kachitchkine schrieb:
Brilliant video, guys.
Totally agreed, great work.
Boy, would I like to see Peter Stormare in that video %)
-Artem.
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Global Systems Engineering http://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
this is not an objective barrier to entry for ZFS.
Note my use of the word objective. I do feel that we have to implement
zpool remove for subjective reasons, but that is a non technical matter.
Is this an agreeable summary of the situation?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin Gonzalez
machines where you only
have 1 disk or are otherwise very disk-limited :).
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Client Solutionshttp://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91
in the above entry to see what I mean. Works great (but I had to
use -f to zpool create :) ) and gives me enough performance for all my
home-serving needs.
Hope this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group
of the
underlying root of the problem?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Client Solutionshttp://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin
on the application layer.
Reminds my of many UltraSPARC T1 issues, which don't sit in hardware nor
OS, but in the way applications have been developed for years :).
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group
enough valid devices to be complete.
Hope this helps,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Client Solutionshttp://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com
at once?
I'm pretty sure ZFS is very intelligent and will do the right thing, but a
confirmation would be nice here.
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Client Solutionshttp
regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Client Solutionshttp://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin
about when I'm done.
Feel free to visit my blog for how to set up your home server as a ZFS iTunes
streaming server :).
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Client Solutionshttp
the implementation very deeply...
-Luke
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Constantin Gonzalez
,
Constantin
- Eric
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
Hi,
of course, the reason for this is the copy-on-write approach: ZFS has
to write new blocks first before the modification of the FS structure
can reflect the state with the deleted blocks
/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform Technology Group, Client Solutionshttp://www.sun.de/
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 http://blogs.sun.com/constantin
from hand, then re-run mount_all or replace the vfstab entry with
a simple symlink. Which only works until you say add_install_client the next
time.
Is this a known issue?
Best regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin GonzalezSun Microsystems GmbH, Germany
Platform
61 matches
Mail list logo