On 25/01/2011, at 22.39, Ian Collins wrote:
On 01/26/11 09:50 AM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
I'd go with some Dell MD1200's, for us they ended up being cheaper (incl
disks) than a SuperMicro case with the same model disks, and it's way nicer
than the low-quality SuperMicro stuff.
That's
On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote:
So, another hardware question :)
ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather
than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays at it.
I've just noticed that Dell has a 6.0.1 firmware upgrade available, at least
for my R610's they do (they are about 3 months old). Oddly enough it doesn't
show up on support.dell.com when I search using my servicecode, but if I check
through System Services / Lifecycle Controller it does find
On 08/08/2010, at 07.23, valrh...@gmail.com wrote:
2. I'd also recommend avoiding the PERC cards, in particular since it makes
drives attached to it impossible to transport to another system. Instead, I
use the SAS 6i/R controller. That's built into the motherboard on the PW
T7500, and I
+1
I badly need this.
On 09/07/2010, at 19.40, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Anyone knows where in the pipeline BP rewrite is, or how long this pipeline
is?
You could move the data elsewhere using zfs send and recv, destroy the
original datasets and then recreate them. This would stripe
Hi,
Have any of you looked at SSD's from Virident ?
http://virident.com/products.php
Looks pretty impressive to me, though I am sure the price is as well.
- Lasse
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
This may well have been covered before but I've not been able to find an answer
to this particular question.
I've setup a raidz2 test env using files like this:
# mkfile 1g t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 t10 s1 s2
# zpool create dataPool raidz2 /xvm/t1 /xvm/t2 /xvm/t3 /xvm/t4 /xvm/t5
#
On 08/02/2010, at 22.50, Richard Elling wrote:
r...@vmstor01:/# zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
dataPool 9.94G 4.89G 5.04G49% 1.00x ONLINE -
Now here's what I don't get, why does it say the poo sizel is 9.94G when
it's made up of 2 x
On 09/02/2010, at 00.23, Daniel Carosone wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:28:11PM +0100, Lasse Osterild wrote:
Ok thanks I know that the amount of used space will vary, but what's
the usefulness of the total size when ie in my pool above 4 x 1G
(roughly, depending on recordsize
Hi,
Seems either Solaris or SunSolve is in need of an update.
pool: dataPool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are
unaffected.
action: Determine if the device needs to be
10 matches
Mail list logo
