David Runyon wrote:
I was presenting to a customer at the EBC yesterday, and one of the
people at the meeting said using df in ZFS really drives him crazy (no,
that's all the detail I have). Any ideas/suggestions?
Filter it. This is UNIX after all...
-- richard
On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:57, Richard Elling wrote:
David Runyon wrote:
I was presenting to a customer at the EBC yesterday, and one of the
people at the meeting said using df in ZFS really drives him crazy
(no,
that's all the detail I have). Any ideas/suggestions?
Filter it. This is
[warning: paradigm shifted]
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:57, Richard Elling wrote:
David Runyon wrote:
I was presenting to a customer at the EBC yesterday, and one of the
people at the meeting said using df in ZFS really drives him crazy (no,
that's all the detail I
On Oct 18, 2007, at 13:26, Richard Elling wrote:
Yes. It is true that ZFS redefines the meaning of available space.
But
most people like compression, snapshots, clones, and the pooling
concept.
It may just be that you want zfs list instead, df is old-school :-)
exactly - i'm not
I asked this recently, but haven't done anything else about it:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=155583#155583
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 10/17/07, David Runyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was presenting to a customer at the EBC yesterday, and one of the
people at the meeting said using df in ZFS really drives him crazy (no,
that's all the detail I have). Any ideas/suggestions?
I suspect that this is related to the notion
