Thanks for your feedback.. any comments on VxFS..
Also is there any limit of files within filesystem or within directory
for optimal performance..
Thanks
Robert Milkowski wrote On 10/14/06 04:19,:
Hello Ramneek,
Friday, October 13, 2006, 6:07:22 PM, you wrote:
RS Hello Experts
RS Would
Hello zfs-discuss,
S10U2+patches. ZFS pool of about 2TB in size. Each day snapshot is
created and 7 copies are kept. There's quota set for a file system
however there's always at least 50GB of free space in a file system
(and much more in a pool). ZFS file system is exported over NFS.
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 20:54 -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
Someone said being able to add devices to a raidz vdev is on the todo list.
Don't hold your breath. This isn't being worked on, or on anyone's todo
list at this point, and implementing it would be pretty
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 10/13/06, Matthew Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using ZFS for a zones root is currently planned to be supported in
solaris 10 update 5, but we are working on moving it up to update 4.
Are there any areas where the community can help with this?
Hi guys,
On 16 Oct 2006, at 14:30, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 20:54 -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
Someone said being able to add devices to a raidz vdev is on the
todo list.
Don't hold your breath. This isn't being worked on, or on
anyone's todo
Hi folks,
Myself and a colleague are currently involved in a prototyping exercise
to evaluate ZFS against our current filesystem. We are looking at the
best way to arrange the disks in a 3510 storage array.
We have been testing with the 12 disks on the 3510 exported as nraid
logical devices. We
Matthew Ahrens wrote On 10/16/06 09:07,:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
S10U2+patches. ZFS pool of about 2TB in size. Each day snapshot is
created and 7 copies are kept. There's quota set for a file system
however there's always at least 50GB of free space in a file system
Ciaran Johnston (AT/LMI) wrote:
[SNIP]
With our current filesystem, we create two 5-disk RAID5 arrays and
export these as two logical devices, with two spare disks. In a ZFS
scenario, is it worth us letting the 3510 do RAID5 in the way we
currently do, or should we let ZFS manage all the RAID
On 16 Oct 2006, at 14:30, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 20:54 -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
Someone said being able to add devices to a raidz vdev is on the
todo list.
Don't hold your breath. This isn't being worked on, or on
anyone's todo
youmayalsowanttocheckoutEricKustarz'sblog,whichisgoodtonoteifyour'reusingstoragearrays:http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/vq_max_pendingNoelOnOct16,2006,at11:21AM,TorreyMcMahonwrote:Ciaran Johnston (AT/LMI) wrote: [SNIP]With our current filesystem, we create two 5-disk RAID5 arrays andexport
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 01:05 +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
While waiting for Thumpers to come I'm thinking how to configure
them. I would like to use raid-z. As thumper has 6 SATA controllers
each 8-port then maybe it would make sense to create raid-z groups
from
Hello,
Richard and Frank - thank you for info.
--
Best regards,
Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
I'm glad you asked this question. We are currently expecting 3511 storage
sub-systems for our servers. We were wondering about their configuration as
well. This ZFS thing throws a wrench in the old line think ;-) Seriously, we
now have to put on a new hat to figure out the best way to leverage
Matthew Ahrens writes:
Jeremy Teo wrote:
Would it be worthwhile to implement heuristics to auto-tune
'recordsize', or would that not be worth the effort?
Here is one relatively straightforward way you could implement this.
You can't (currently) change the recordsize once there
Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
I'm glad you asked this question. We are currently expecting 3511 storage sub-systems for
our servers. We were wondering about their configuration as well. This ZFS thing throws a
wrench in the old line think ;-) Seriously, we now have to put on a new hat to figure out
Richard Elling - PAE wrote:
Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
I'm glad you asked this question. We are currently expecting 3511
storage sub-systems for our servers. We were wondering about their
configuration as well. This ZFS thing throws a wrench in the old line
think ;-) Seriously, we now have to
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Richard Elling - PAE wrote:
Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
I'm glad you asked this question. We are currently expecting 3511
storage sub-systems for our servers. We were wondering about their
configuration as well. This ZFS thing throws a wrench in the old line
think ;-)
17 matches
Mail list logo
