Is there a way to use only 2 or 3 digits for the second level of the
var/pkg/download cache? This directory hierarchy is particularly problematic
relative to moving, copying, sending, etc. This would probably speed up
lookups as well.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hello all,
Are there any best practices / recommendations for ways of doing this ?
In this case the ZVOLs would be iSCSI LUNS containing ESX VMs .I am aware
of the of the need for the VMs to be quiesced for the backups to be useful.
Cheers.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I use Intel Q9450 + P45 Gigabyte EP45-DS3P. I put the AOC card into a PCI slot,
not PCI-x. About the HBA, I have no idea.
So I had half of the drives in the AOC card, and the other half on the mobo
SATA ports. Now I have all drives to the AOC card, and suddenly a scrub takes
15h instead of 8h.
P45 Gigabyte EP45-DS3P. I put the AOC card into a PCI slot
I'm not sure how many half your disks are or how your vdevs
are configured, but the ICH10 has 6 sata ports at 300MB and
one PCI port at 266MB (that's also shared with the IT8213 IDE chip)
so in an ideal world your scrub bandwidth
Has this issue been solved yet? I see the same issue when trying to upgrade
from 112 to 126.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Sat, Nov 14 at 11:23, Rob Logan wrote:
P45 Gigabyte EP45-DS3P. I put the AOC card into a PCI slot
I'm not sure how many half your disks are or how your vdevs
are configured, but the ICH10 has 6 sata ports at 300MB and
one PCI port at 266MB (that's also shared with the IT8213 IDE chip)
so
On Nov 13, 2009, at 10:36 PM, Tristan Ball wrote:
I think the exception may be when doing a recursive snapshot - ZFS
appears to halt IO so that it can take all the snapshots at the same
instant.
Snapshots cause a txg commit, similar to what you get when you run sync.
The time required to
I have been using opensolaris for a couple of weeks, today is my first time I
reboot the system and I ran into a problem loading my external hd (meant for
backup).
I was expecting a more descriptive name of the file names, but given that I
have no clue which ones are those, can I just tell the
ph == Phil Harman phil.har...@gmail.com writes:
The format of the stream is committed. You will be able to
receive your streams on future versions of ZFS.
What Erik said is stronger than the man page in an important way,
though. He said you can dump an old stream into a filesystem on
Seems like upgrading from b126 to b127 will have the
same problem.
Yes, good point. I provided a blurb about this issue, here:
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Troubleshooting_Guide#Live_Upgrade_Problem_.28Starting_in_Nevada.2C_build_125.29
Its a good idea to review this
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
I use Intel Q9450 + P45 Gigabyte EP45-DS3P. I put the AOC card into a PCI
slot, not PCI-x. About the HBA, I have no idea.
It sounds like you're saturating the PCI port. The ICH10 has a
32-bit/33MHz PCI bus
Thanks for the help.
I was curious whether the zfs send|receive was considered suitable given a few
things I've read which said somethings along the lines of don't count on being
able to restore this stuff. Ideally that is what I would use with the
'incremental' option so as to only backup
Miles Nordin wrote:
ph == Phil Harman phil.har...@gmail.com writes:
The format of the stream is committed. You will be able to
receive your streams on future versions of ZFS.
What Erik said is stronger than the man page in an important way,
though. He said you can dump
The ICH10 has a 32-bit/33MHz PCI bus which provides 133MB/s at half duplex.
you are correct, I thought ICH10 used a 66Mhz bus, when infact its 33Mhz. The
AOC card works fine in a PCI-X 64Bit/133Mhz slot good for 1,067 MB/s
even if the motherboard uses a PXH chip via 8 lane PCIE.
On Nov 14, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Brian McKerr wrote:
Thanks for the help.
I was curious whether the zfs send|receive was considered suitable
given a few things I've read which said somethings along the lines
of don't count on being able to restore this stuff. Ideally that
is what I would use
There is also a long-standing bug in the ALi chipset used on these servers
which ZFS tickles. I don't think a work-around for this bug was ever
implemented, and it's still present in Solaris 10.
On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
The Netra X1 has one ATA bus for both
Yes indeed, but my point was that it was not always so. This change
was something I and others campaigned for quite some time ago.
Indeed, in the early days of ZFS evangelism (when I was still at Sun)
the issue came up rather often. In those days there were even more
reasons not to use a
17 matches
Mail list logo
