[zfs-discuss] zfs iscsi storage for virtual machines

2007-07-16 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I'm going to be setting up about 6 virtual machines (Windows Linux) in either VMWare Server or Xen on a CentOS 5 box. I'd like to connect to a ZFS iSCSI target to store the vm images and be able to use zfs snapshots for backup. I have no experience with ZFS, so I have a couple of questions

[zfs-discuss] implementation recommendation

2007-07-26 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I'm looking to use ZFS to store about 6-10 live virtual machine images (served via VMWare Server on Linux) and network file storage for ~50 Windows clients. I'll probably start at about 1TB of storage and want to be able to scale to at least 4TB. Cost and reliability are my two greatest concerns.

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs iscsi storage for virtual machines

2007-08-08 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I have hundreds of Xen-based virtual machines running off a ZFS/iSCSI service; yes, it's viable. I can't speak for CentOS specifically; our infrastructure is using Debian Etch with our own build of Xen. How does ZFS handle snapshots of large files like VM images? Is replication done on the

[zfs-discuss] is send/receive incremental

2007-08-08 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I'd like to send a backup of my filesystem offsite nightly using zfs send/receive. Are those done incrementally so only changes move or would a full copy get shuttled across everytime? -- Pete ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

[zfs-discuss] samba and acls

2007-08-13 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I've got Samba configured in an active directory domain, but I'm having issues getting acls to work properly. Adding users or groups via a Windows client results in the error: 'Unable to save permission changes on myshare. Access is denied.' I'm running snv_68. Does ZFS have Samba compatible

Re: [zfs-discuss] samba and acls

2007-08-13 Thread Peter Baumgartner
Hmmm, do I need to wait for Samba 3.0.26? http://www.nabble.com/VFS-module-handling-ACL-on-ZFS-t3730348.html#a10614406 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Samba and ZFS ACL Question

2007-08-22 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I would also like to use this module. This bug http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6561700 leads me to believe it can be used with the current version of Samba. Do I need to rebuild Samba? If so, does anybody have pointers on doing that? I'm not having any luck trying to build

Re: [zfs-discuss] Samba and ZFS ACL Question

2007-08-22 Thread Peter Baumgartner
On 8/22/07, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would also like to use this module. This bug http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6561700 leads me to believe it can be used with the current version of Samba. Do I need to rebuild Samba? If so, does anybody have pointers

[zfs-discuss] zfs + iscsi + ntfs best practices

2007-10-22 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I need to format a zfs iscsi target as ntfs (Samba + ADS got the best of me). How do you recommend setting up the software for optimal stability? My main concern is how I will handle growing the partition down the road. Any advice from those experienced in a setup like this is much appreciated.

[zfs-discuss] recommendations on adding vdev to raidz zpool

2008-10-25 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I have a 7x150GB drive (+1 spare) raidz pool that I need to expand. There are 6 open drive bays, so I bought 6 300GB drives and went to add them as a raidz vdev to the existing zpool, but I didn't realize the raidz vdevs needed to have the same number of drives. (why is that?) My plan now is to,

Re: [zfs-discuss] recommendations on adding vdev to raidz zpool

2008-10-26 Thread Peter Baumgartner
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Mattias Pantzare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a 7x150GB drive (+1 spare) raidz pool that I need to expand. There are 6 open drive bays, so I bought 6 300GB drives and went to add

[zfs-discuss] incremental send/recv larger than sum of snapshots?

2009-09-04 Thread Peter Baumgartner
I've been sending daily incrementals off-site for a while now, but recently they failed so I had to send an incremental covering a number of snapshots. I expected the incremental to be approximately the sum of the snapshots, but it seems to be considerably larger and still going. The source