[zfs-discuss] [Blade 150] ZFS: extreme low performance

2006-09-15 Thread Mathias F
Hi forum, I'm currently a little playing around with ZFS on my workstation. I created a standard mirrored pool over 2 disk-slices. # zpool status Pool: mypool Status: ONLINE scrub: Keine erforderlich config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypoolONLINE

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS imported simultanously on 2 systems...

2006-09-13 Thread Mathias F
Well, we are using the -f parameter to test failover functionality. If one system with mounted ZFS is down, we have to use the force to mount it on the failover system. But when the failed system comes online again, it remounts the ZFS without errors, so it is mounted simultanously on both

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS imported simultanously on 2 systems...

2006-09-13 Thread Mathias F
Without -f option, the ZFS can't be imported while reserved for the other host, even if that host is down. As I said, we are testing ZFS as a [b]replacement for VxVM[/b], which we are using atm. So as a result our tests have failed and we have to keep on using Veritas. Thanks for all your

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Re: ZFS imported simultanously on 2 systems...

2006-09-13 Thread Mathias F
[...] a product which is *not* currently multi-host-aware to behave in the same safe manner as one which is. That`s the point we figured out while testing it ;) I just wanted to have our thoughts reviewed by other ZFS users. Our next steps IF the failover would have succeeded would be to