Re: [storage-discuss] Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] se3510 and ZFS

2007-02-06 Thread eric kustarz
IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write cache on the arrays is being worked on. Yep, the bug is: 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit when issuing SYNCHRONIZE CACHE to SBC-2 devices We have a case going through PSARC that will make things works correctly with

Re[2]: [storage-discuss] Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] se3510 and ZFS

2007-02-06 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello eric, Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:55:23 PM, you wrote: IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write cache on the arrays is being worked on. ek Yep, the bug is: ek 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit when issuing SYNCHRONIZE ek CACHE to ek SBC-2 devices

Re: [storage-discuss] Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] se3510 and ZFS

2007-02-06 Thread Neil Perrin
Robert Milkowski wrote On 02/06/07 11:43,: Hello eric, Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:55:23 PM, you wrote: IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write cache on the arrays is being worked on. ek Yep, the bug is: ek 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit when issuing

Re: Re[2]: [storage-discuss] Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] se3510 and ZFS

2007-02-06 Thread eric kustarz
On Feb 6, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello eric, Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:55:23 PM, you wrote: IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write cache on the arrays is being worked on. ek Yep, the bug is: ek 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit