-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomas Ögren wrote:
| To get similar (lower) consistency guarantees, try disabling ZIL..
| google://zil_disable .. This should up the speed, but might cause disk
| corruption if the server crashes while a client is writing data.. (just
| like with UFS)
I also test the nfs with 'zfs set sharenfs=on' performance with a linux client.
By echo zil_disable/W0t1 | mdb -kw the small files from nfs speed up 10x.
about zil_disable,see Eric Kustarz's blog:
http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/zil_disable
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 24 January, 2008 - Steve Hillman sent me these 1,9K bytes:
I realize that this topic has been fairly well beaten to death on this
forum, but I've also read numerous comments from ZFS developers that they'd
like to hear about significantly different performance numbers
Hello Darren,
DJM BTW there isn't really any such think as disk corruption there is
DJM data corruption :-)
Well, if you scratch it hard enough :)
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.philohome.com/hammerhead/broken-disk.jpg :-)
Be careful, things like this can result in device corruption!
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Darren,
DJM BTW there isn't really any such think as disk corruption there is
DJM data corruption :-)
Well, if you scratch it hard enough :)
http://www.philohome.com/hammerhead/broken-disk.jpg :-)
___
I realize that this topic has been fairly well beaten to death on this forum,
but I've also read numerous comments from ZFS developers that they'd like to
hear about significantly different performance numbers of ZFS vs UFS for
NFS-exported filesystems, so here's one more.
The server is an
Steve Hillman wrote:
I realize that this topic has been fairly well beaten to death on this forum,
but I've also read numerous comments from ZFS developers that they'd like to
hear about significantly different performance numbers of ZFS vs UFS for
NFS-exported filesystems, so here's one
On 24 January, 2008 - Steve Hillman sent me these 1,9K bytes:
I realize that this topic has been fairly well beaten to death on this forum,
but I've also read numerous comments from ZFS developers that they'd like to
hear about significantly different performance numbers of ZFS vs UFS for
