Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE 4852783

2008-08-08 Thread Miles Nordin
t == Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: t Why would you have to buy smaller disks? You can replace the t 320's with 1tb drives and after the last 320 is out of the t raidgroup, it will grow automatically. This does work for me to grow a mirrored vdev on nevada b71. The way I found

[zfs-discuss] RFE 4852783

2008-06-16 Thread Miles Nordin
Is RFE 4852783 (need for an equivalent to LVM2's pvmove) likely to happen within the next year? My use-case is home user. I have 16 disks spinning, two towers of eight disks each, exporting some of them as iSCSI targets. Four disks are 1TB disks already in ZFS mirrors, and 12 disks are 180 -

Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE 4852783

2008-06-16 Thread Neil Perrin
This is actually quite a tricky fix as obviously data and meta data have to be relocated. Although there's been no visible activity in this bug there has been substantial design activity to allow the RFE to be easily fixed. Anyway, to answer your question, I would fully expect this RFE would be

Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE 4852783

2008-06-16 Thread Tim
Why would you have to buy smaller disks? You can replace the 320's with 1tb drives and after the last 320 is out of the raidgroup, it will grow automatically. On 6/16/08, Miles Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is RFE 4852783 (need for an equivalent to LVM2's pvmove) likely to happen within