Re: [zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-11 Thread Cyril Plisko
Neil, many thanks for publishing this doc - it is exactly what I was looking for ! On 7/9/07, Neil Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Er with attachment this time. So I've attached the accepted proposal. There was (as expected) not much discussion of this case as it was considered an

Re: [zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-09 Thread Neil Perrin
Cyril Plisko wrote: On 7/7/07, Neil Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cyril, I wrote this case and implemented the project. My problem was that I didn't know what policy (if any) Sun has about publishing ARC cases, and a mail log with a gazillion email addresses. I did receive an answer to

Re: [zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-09 Thread Neil Perrin
Er with attachment this time. So I've attached the accepted proposal. There was (as expected) not much discussion of this case as it was considered an obvious extension. The actual psarc case materials when opened will not have much more info than this. PSARC CASE: 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent

[zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-07 Thread Cyril Plisko
Hello, This is a third request to open the materials of the PSARC case 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log I am not sure why two previous requests were completely ignored (even when seconded by another community member). In any case that is absolutely unaccepted practice. On 6/30/07, Cyril Plisko

Re: [zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-07 Thread Mike Gerdts
On 7/7/07, Cyril Plisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, This is a third request to open the materials of the PSARC case 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log I am not sure why two previous requests were completely ignored (even when seconded by another community member). In any case that is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-07 Thread Casper . Dik
On 7/7/07, Cyril Plisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, This is a third request to open the materials of the PSARC case 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log I am not sure why two previous requests were completely ignored (even when seconded by another community member). In any case that is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-07 Thread Neil Perrin
Cyril, I wrote this case and implemented the project. My problem was that I didn't know what policy (if any) Sun has about publishing ARC cases, and a mail log with a gazillion email addresses. I did receive an answer to this this in the form:

Re: [zfs-discuss] Take Three: PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log

2007-07-07 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 7/7/07, Neil Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cyril, I wrote this case and implemented the project. My problem was that I didn't know what policy (if any) Sun has about publishing ARC cases, and a mail log with a gazillion email addresses. I did receive an answer to this this in the form: