Jürgen Herrmann wrote:
btw. i'll learn to formulate my questions better...
the actual question way back then should have read (and not more):
who (which method) is responsible for delivering an ImageFile instances
content when called, as index_html obviously is NOT called?
The publisher
Jürgen Herrmann wrote:
to not clutter the zodb-dev list, i'll write you personally...
It's what the list is here for, please keep CC'ing it or you're unlikely
to get a response in the future...
arent't these two code snippets doing the same?
class MyClass:
myTemplate =
Hello,
I made a copy of a live Zope-instance behind a webserver to my PC for
testing purposes. I just copied the files in 'var' and 'Products' and
changed the folders in zopectl. I am also running the same Zope version
(2.8.0) as on the remote server and with the same structure:
Root Folder
I have some ZSQL methods written on the file system using FSDV. In ZMI
I can not find the 'Advanced' tab usually available for ZSQL methods
in ZODB for specifying the caching properties of the ZSQL method.
Can anyone give some clues as how to do this for ZSQL on FSDV? I
suppose I might need to
On 3/2/06, leandros van den berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to log in to http://localhost:8080/middelen I get a
'TypeError: unpack non-sequence' instead of a login-prompt. Logging in
to http://localhost:8080/manage does work.
[...]
Traceback (innermost last):
* Module
On 3/2/06, Yuan HOng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone give some clues as how to do this for ZSQL on FSDV? I
suppose I might need to write some *.metadata file to specify these
properties using FSDV?
You must specify the cache settings in the .zsql file itself, using a
dtml-comment block at
You are close ;-)
The info goes into a dtml-comment block at the start of the file.
dtml-comment
title: Foo
arguments: foo bar
max_rows: 1000
max_cache: 100
cache_time: 60
/dtml-comment
...
Stefan
On 2. Mär 2006, at 15:15, Yuan HOng wrote:
I have some ZSQL methods written on the file
Hello,
Roman Klesel schrieb:
I can call this method on whatever folder inside the product instance I
want, it will always return the id of the
product and not the id of the product I call it on.
In order to make my problem more obvious I created a minimal product. See
attachmet.
It
I'm trying to access a zope site via webdav on port 8181. Dreamweaver
works ok, but the client in winXP do not want to connect with error:
The folder you entered does not seem to be valid. Please choose another.
the traceback on zope is:
2006-03-02T15:48:41 ERROR Zope.SiteErrorLog
On 2 Mar 2006, at 14:50, Einar Næss Jensen wrote:
I'm trying to access a zope site via webdav on port 8181. Dreamweaver
works ok, but the client in winXP do not want to connect with error:
The folder you entered does not seem to be valid. Please choose
another.
If you're trying to use the
On 3/2/06, Einar Næss Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to access a zope site via webdav on port 8181. Dreamweaver
works ok, but the client in winXP do not want to connect with error:
The folder you entered does not seem to be valid. Please choose another.
And the question is: What
On 3/2/06, Einar Næss Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/06, Einar Næss Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to access a zope site via webdav on port 8181. Dreamweaver
works ok, but the client in winXP do not want to connect with error:
The folder you entered does not seem to be
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-3-2 14:53 +:
...
If you're trying to use the M$ WebFolder-stuff you might as well give
up immediately. It simply does not work right.
We are using it -- quite successfully :-)
We had to fix some bugs in Zope's WebDAV support, e.g. properties
may not be pure
leandros van den berg wrote at 2006-3-2 14:13 +0100:
...
Below is the entry from the middelen/error_log:
Time 2006/03/02 13:22:49.932 GMT+1
User Name (User Id)Anonymous User (None)
Request URLhttp://localhost:8080/middelen/index_html
Exception Type TypeError
Exception Value
Roman Klesel wrote at 2006-3-2 08:13 +0100:
...
I can call this method on whatever folder inside the product instance
(instance of the base class ZLTMS) I want, it will
always return the id of the instace of the base class (where the method is
defined) and not the id of the object (Folder
Einar Næss Jensen wrote at 2006-3-2 15:50 +0100:
I'm trying to access a zope site via webdav on port 8181. Dreamweaver
works ok, but the client in winXP do not want to connect with error:
The folder you entered does not seem to be valid. Please choose another.
the traceback on zope is:
On 2 Mar 2006, at 18:35, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-3-2 14:53 +:
...
If you're trying to use the M$ WebFolder-stuff you might as well give
up immediately. It simply does not work right.
We are using it -- quite successfully :-)
We had to fix some bugs in Zope's
Title: Zed should stand for Zope Extension Distribution
Over at the Zope-Dev mailing list, Jim Fulton (the inventor of Zope) is talking about a new line of software called Zed. It would consist of those parts of Zope 3 which can be called independently of the Zope/twisted server.
I do not
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) schrieb:
Over at the Zope-Dev mailing list, Jim Fulton (the inventor of Zope) is
talking about a new line of software called Zed. It would consist of
those parts of Zope 3 which can be called independently of the
Zope/twisted server.
please be carefull on inventing of
--On 2. März 2006 23:02:13 +0100 Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) schrieb:
Over at the Zope-Dev mailing list, Jim Fulton (the inventor of Zope) is
talking about a new line of software called Zed. It would consist of
those parts of Zope 3 which can be called
+---[ Roman Klesel ]--
| Hello,
|
| Roman Klesel schrieb:
| I can call this method on whatever folder inside the product instance I
want, it will always return the id of the
| product and not the id of the product I call it on.
|
| In order to make my problem more
Log message for revision 65734:
some cleanup
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/ajung-final-zpt-integration/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/Engine.py
-=-
Modified:
Zope/branches/ajung-final-zpt-integration/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/Engine.py
Log message for revision 65738:
added ZPL
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/ajung-final-zpt-integration/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/Engine.py
-=-
Modified:
Zope/branches/ajung-final-zpt-integration/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/Engine.py
Log message for revision 65741:
Move site manager adapter and subscriber configuration (IOW, the useful stuff
in Five.site) to Five.component.
Changed:
U Products.Five/branches/philikon-local-components/component/__init__.py
U
Log message for revision 65742:
Oh, and yeah, include Five.component config
Changed:
U Products.Five/branches/philikon-local-components/configure.zcml
-=-
Modified: Products.Five/branches/philikon-local-components/configure.zcml
Log message for revision 65744:
update imports
use @adapter, @implementer instead of specifying interfaces in ZCML
Changed:
UU Products.Five/branches/philikon-local-components/component/__init__.py
U Products.Five/branches/philikon-local-components/component/configure.zcml
-=-
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Run 'inst/WinBuilders/buildout zope'.
Ah, you need Inno 5.x too. See inst/WinBuilders/README.txt for the
complete instructions.
OK, are either you (or anyone else at Enfold) or Tim going to roll the
2.9.1 binary or would you like me to pick it up from now on?
cheers,
--On 2. März 2006 11:42:09 +0100 Wolfgang Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case your file is to be taken as the Zope-2.9.1 windows release i'd
need it at the Zope-2.9.1 release folder and not at your member folder.
Sure. I've removed it from my member folder.
I think one needs to be
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:43:38PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| Run 'inst/WinBuilders/buildout zope'.
|
| Ah, you need Inno 5.x too. See inst/WinBuilders/README.txt for the
| complete instructions.
|
| OK, are either you (or anyone else at Enfold) or Tim going to roll
On Tue, 2006-28-02 at 13:21 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
I would vote for spelling out Zed (which would also be a little easier
to google but might create trademark problems). The namespace package
could either be 'z' or 'zed'.
Then again, I
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:43:03 -0330, Rocky Burt wrote:
Anyway, this still keeps things very confusing from a naming perspective
(mostly for new adopters). So having said all of that, I am
actually +1 on Jim's proposal #2. What I see from that (someone correct
me if I'm wrong) is the
+1 on Jim's suggestion #2.
However, if I am understanding things correctly, it doesn't really sound
like door #2 entails a huge deviation from from our current course of
bringing Zope 2 and Zope 3 together gradually. I don't really care what
the converged product is called, be it Zope 2.250 or
Geoff Davis wrote:
I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great.
I think it is stupid.
We (Zope Corp + the Zope Community) have spent 8 years building the Zope
brand, and you want to restart from scratch ?
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77
On Thursday 02 March 2006 10:29, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Geoff Davis wrote:
I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great.
I think it is stupid.
Me too!!
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k -
Geoff Davis wrote:
+1 on Jim's suggestion #2.
However, if I am understanding things correctly, it doesn't really sound
like door #2 entails a huge deviation from from our current course of
bringing Zope 2 and Zope 3 together gradually. I don't really care what
the converged product is called,
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:38:03 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great.
Zope 3 is a _huge_ overhaul and it needs to be obvious to the world that
it is dramatically better than crufty old Zope 2. Zope 3 then becomes the
Zed application
Geoff Davis wrote:
Yes, and the use of the new name Z or Zed is a way to emphasize that
the Zed library is NOT a big, monolithic app server; rather, it's
something new and cool.
Zope 3 is new and cool.
Or at least, let's spin it this way.
Screencasts, podcasts, 14'59 wikis (quicker than
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Geoff Davis wrote:
I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great..
I think it is stupid.
We (Zope Corp + the Zope Community) have spent 8 years building the Zope
brand, and you want to restart from scratch ?
Hehe, poor Geoff. :)
In the
Geoff Davis wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:38:03 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great.
Zope 3 is a _huge_ overhaul and it needs to be obvious to the world that
it is dramatically better than crufty old Zope 2. Zope 3 then becomes the
Paul Everitt wrote:
...
People have it set in their brain that Zope is a monolithic web
application server. Hard to dispel that meme.
Yup. I'd rather adjust the meme to:
Zope is a agile flexible extensible app server with rich services.
:)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:43:03 -0330, Rocky Burt wrote:
On Tue, 2006-28-02 at 13:21 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
I would vote for spelling out Zed (which would also be a little easier
to google but might create trademark problems). The namespace
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77 (mobile).
Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps
Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
I think that the idea of giving Zed its own, distinct identity is great.
I think it is stupid.
We (Zope Corp + the Zope Community) have spent 8 years building the Zope
brand, and you want to restart from scratch ?
Good point. There's the question: Does this zed
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
It's not about sacrificing the Zope-the-app-server brand. It's actually
about growing it in the sense that it becomes much clearer WHAT THE HELL
Zope actually is. Or can
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
um, if you reread what i said, and what i think rocky is trying to say,
i'm in favor of _keeping_ the zope brand for the app server, which is
what zope has always
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Good point. There's the question: Does this zed thing need a different
name at all? If we want other people to pick it up, then it seems like a
good idea to distinguish it from Zope-the-app-server. Paul seems to
suggest that in his response.
How about zopelib?
Benji York wrote:
Good point. There's the question: Does this zed thing need a different
name at all? If we want other people to pick it up, then it seems like a
good idea to distinguish it from Zope-the-app-server. Paul seems to
suggest that in his response.
How about zopelib?
If we want
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:31:38 -, Stefane Fermigier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
I don't think that's true. I'm certainly not, and I've not heard anyone
directly in favour of that either. What
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:18:27 -, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zope is a agile flexible extensible app server with rich services.
You forgot Enterprise.
Martin
--
(muted)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 09:58 +0100, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 12:11 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
A while ago, we had some discussion on when to make releases and
how long to support deprecated features. The discussion has died down
so I'll summarize
On 1 Mar 2006, at 21:50, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl schrieb:
Zac has asked to step back a bit as the contact for the project and I
told him I could take over that part. That includes things like
release
stewardship.
One of the items that had been on my list for a while was to
51 matches
Mail list logo
