Jerry Turba schreef:
> Willie Wong wrote:
>
>> Do you have gentoolkit installed? If so, run
>>
>> # equery list -p gentoo-sources
>>
>>
> Results of equery: backup:~ $ equery list -p gentoo-sources [
> Searching for package 'gentoo-sources'
tc/portage-Richard--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
That was a bit more productive:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # find /usr/local/portage/ /etc/portage
/usr/local/portage/
/usr/local/portage/sys-kernel
/usr/local/portage/sys-kernel/win4lin-sources
/usr/local/portage/sys-kernel/win4lin-sources/Manifest
On one of two gentoo (x86_64 AMD Opteron) systems I just emerged the new portage-2.1 on, emerge is requiring gentoo-sources as a dependency required by "x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7". Why? The 2nd system with an identical 2.6.16.20 vanilla-sources kernel does not have this problem.I trie
Willie Wong wrote:
Do you have gentoolkit installed? If so, run
# equery list -p gentoo-sources
It'd be good to know if you are missing the ebuild or if it is masked
somehow.
W
Results of equery:
backup:~ $ equery list -p gentoo-sources
[ Searching for package 'gentoo-sourc
unless it actually has, and the problem is Portage not
>> knowing it somehow....
>>
>> Would you do an
>>
>> ls /usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/
>>
>> and post the output?
>>
>> I'm just wondering if the ebuilds are physica
From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:41 PM
> you said you used 6 different kernel versions - which one? Did you use
> vanilla or gentoo sources? And... maybe config?
I've used all gentoo-sources so far, but I can give va
Holly Bostick wrote:
Jerry Turba schreef:
Willie Wong wrote:
Do you have gentoolkit installed? If so, run
# equery list -p gentoo-sources
Results of equery: backup:~ $ equery list -p gentoo-sources [
Searching for package 'gentoo-sources' in all catego
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:36:33PM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly Bostick squawked:
> Jerry Turba schreef:
> > Results of equery: backup:~ $ equery list -p gentoo-sources [
> > Searching for package 'gentoo-sources' in all categories among: ] *
> > installed packages
On 09/21/2013 01:36 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:27:28 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> If I understood the instruction above, 'emerge --noreplace
>> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.13' should have added 'gentoo-sources' to
>>
spö Data
> Lilla Aspö 148
> S-742 94 Östhammar
> Sweden
> +46 173 140 57
>
>
>
Try updating to a new kernel.
I'm saying this because of the output of equery d virtual/dev-manager on
my system:
~ $ equery d virtual/dev-manager
* These packages depend on virtual/dev-man
05.0
>
Hum, I have the same profile, and don't have your problem.
[07:47 PM]wwong ~ $ ls -ld /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Apr 2 2005 /etc/make.profile ->
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0
[07:47 PM]wwong ~ $ equery list -p gentoo-sources
[ Searching
putting
>
> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.2
>
> in package.mask to stay with 4.1 (it's an LTS kernel) and always get
> the patches for that one.
In /etc/portage/package-mask, using the line you suggest:
>=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.2
Makes emerge want to install
Am 22.08.2014 um 02:05 schrieb Mike Edenfield:
> From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:41 PM
>
>> you said you used 6 different kernel versions - which one? Did you use
>> vanilla or gentoo sources? And... maybe co
2013/9/21 Alexander Kapshuk :
> On 09/21/2013 01:36 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:27:28 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>
>>> If I understood the instruction above, 'emerge --noreplace
>>> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.13' should
On 09/21/2013 02:51 PM, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
> 2013/9/21 Alexander Kapshuk :
>> On 09/21/2013 01:36 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:27:28 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I understood the instruction above, 'emerge --nor
Grant Edwards schrieb:
I've got gentoo-sources 2.6.25-r7 installed, and that's the only
verions of the kernel sources that I have installed.
Suddenly (starting today) "emerge -auvtND world" wants to
install an older version of gentoo-sources (2.6.25-r6), and I
tcat is deprecated... Are there plans to build this functionality into
> equery? if not, why??
>
Doesn't 'equery list -p ' do what you want?
$ equery list -p gentoo-sources
[ Searching for package 'gentoo-sources' in all categories among: ]
* installed package
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 3/8/06, jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did an emerge sync a few days ago. If I run emerge -s gentoo- sources
I get:
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Latest version available: 2.4.31-r1
Latest version installed: 2.6.14-r2
Size of downloaded
A recent world update wanted to install a lower version of
gentoo-source as a new slot.
[ebuild NS] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.14.14:3.14.14
[3.14.16:3.14.16] USE="-build -deblob -experimental -symlink" 0 kB
I can't say I've had that happen before.
I've notic
any; as if
there were no connection. But here I am in gmail ;(
Here's the tail end of #emerge gentoo-sources
...
Resolving gentoo.osuosl.org... failed: Temporary failure in name resolution.
wget: unable to resolve host address `gentoo.osuosl.org'
!!! Couldn't download 'genpatches
Michael Hampicke writes:
>>> I'd say you still have a slotted package of gentoo-sources-3.2.*
>>> installed. So portage will upgrade gentoo-sources-3.2.* and
>>> gentoo-sources-3.3.*
>>>
>>> Check with emerge -p --prune gentoo-sources
What I h
On 11/10/2014 09:11, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> A recent world update wanted to install a lower version of
> gentoo-source as a new slot.
> [ebuild NS] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.14.14:3.14.14
> [3.14.16:3.14.16] USE="-build -deblob -experimental -symlink" 0 kB
>
&g
-78.4.1
[nomerge ] media-video/ffmpeg-4.3.1
[nomerge ] media-libs/nv-codec-headers-9.1.23.1
[nomerge ]x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-455.28
[nomerge ] virtual/linux-sources-3-r4
[ebuild NS] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-5.4.72 [5.4.66]
However, this should
I'm trying to emerge gentoo-sources with the -doc use flag set.
emerge -pv gentoo-sources shows that gentoo-sources will be emerged
without the doc use flag.
"-doc" is set both in my make.conf USE variable and in
/etc/portage/package.use
After the emerge 'equery uses g
On 3/8/06, jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did an emerge sync a few days ago. If I run emerge -s gentoo- sources
> I get:
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> Latest version available: 2.4.31-r1
> Latest version installed: 2.6.14-r2
> Size of
On 2008-08-04, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I've got gentoo-sources 2.6.25-r7 installed, and that's the only
>> verions of the kernel sources that I have installed.
>>
>> Suddenly (starting today) "em
On 6/19/19 11:27 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 6/19/19 11:37 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
echo '>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.15' >>
/etc/portage/package.mask/kernels
Perfect!
Thank you. :-)
I did name the file /etc/portage/package.mask/gentoo-sources as I like
to
> >
> >> you said you used 6 different kernel versions - which one? Did you use
> >> vanilla or gentoo sources? And... maybe config?
> >
> > I've used all gentoo-sources so far, but I can give vanilla a try.
> > According to
> > my portage logs,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 09:11, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> A recent world update wanted to install a lower version of
>> gentoo-source as a new slot.
>> [ebuild NS ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.14.14:3.14.14
>> [3
ou may find emerge world wanting to downgrade
if your chosen versions are no longer in the tree.
> So, using `emerge --select` and `emerge --deselect` I set up my world
> file this way:
>
> # grep -i gentoo-sources /var/lib/portage/world
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:4.14.105-r
I've got gentoo-sources 2.6.25-r7 installed, and that's the only
verions of the kernel sources that I have installed.
Suddenly (starting today) "emerge -auvtND world" wants to
install an older version of gentoo-sources (2.6.25-r6), and I
can't figure out why:
On 7/8/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian K schreef:
> > Hi there,
> > I need to get a 2.4 kernel onto a system, but
> > gentoo-sources now gives 2.6. I checked
> > gentoo-portage.com and it says that there is still a
> > 2.4 ebuild in the ge
On 5/2/06, Leopold Gouverneur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can I prevent emerge from merging gentoo-sources (I now use sources
from ftp.kernel.org).I tried --unmerge whithout success.
Try 'equery depends gentoo-sources' to see which package(s) want gentoo-sources.
Jusitn
Ian K schreef:
> Hi there,
> I need to get a 2.4 kernel onto a system, but
> gentoo-sources now gives 2.6. I checked
> gentoo-portage.com and it says that there is still a
> 2.4 ebuild in the gentoo-sources package(?).
As indeed there is:
eix gentoo-sources
* sys-kernel
On 2019-06-20 20:10, Dale wrote:
Kai Peter wrote:
The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude
gentoo-sources
from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way
I
could come up with to do this.
You can do an 'emerge --noreplace' - one
http://www.gentoo-portage.com/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
this page shows that the 2.6.15-r1 is availiable for x86 and amd64
gentoo-sources-2.6.15-r1
~alpha amd64 arm ppc ppc64 ~sparc x86
check if the 2.6 kernel is masked.. maybe sync again
though it's weird that all the other versions are m
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:27:28 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> If I understood the instruction above, 'emerge --noreplace
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.13' should have added 'gentoo-sources' to
> /var/lib/portage/world_sets, which it didn't seem to do.
>
ing 2-19'.
> Portage goes through the mirror addresses but can't resolve any; as if
> there were no connection. But here I am in gmail ;(
Did you copy the resolv.conf from the liveCD /etc/ to the chroot ?
You're not in gmail from the chrooted env, are you ?
regards,
Bor
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 21:20 -0400, Matthew Cline wrote:
> I've been having serious problems with newer versions of
> gentoo-sources (basically 2.6.12-r9 and 2.6.12-r10), so I have
> downgraded to 2.6.12-r4, which is rock solid for me. So, I thought to
> add something like this ato
> From:: Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Question regarding trick portage.mask situation
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:20:01 -0400
> I've been having serious problems with newer versions of
> gen
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2008-08-04, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See if there's a package that depends on it:
$ equery depends gentoo-sources
[ Searching for packages depending on gentoo-sources... ]
app-emulation/kqemu-1.3.0_pre11 (kernel_linux? virtual/li
Original Message
Subject:Re: [gentoo-user] --exclude gentoo-sources
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:12:06 +0300
From: Alexander Kapshuk
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
On 08/01/2014 07:58 PM, James wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I know I can use this option to prote
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:45:59 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> box0=; grep sources /var/lib/portage/world
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:3.8.13
>
> Once I decide I no longer need 'gentoo-sources-3.8.13', would it be
> enough just to remove
On 09/21/2013 03:08 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:45:59 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> box0=; grep sources /var/lib/portage/world
>> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
>> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:3.8.13
>>
>> Once I decide I no longer need
nc changed and keeps the eix cache
up to date.
> eix -e gentoo-sources
> * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> Available versions: 2.4.28-r9 ~2.4.31-r1 2.6.9-r9 2.6.12-r9
> 2.6.12-r10 ~2.6.13 ~2.6.13-r1 ~2.6.13-r2 2.6.13-r3
> Installed: 2.6.11-r5 2.6.11-r6 2.6.11-r8 2.6.
27;m wanting to do, update
>> gentoo-sources manually and remove them manually as well but running
>> emerge -auDN world doesn't pull in newer versions and --depclean leaves
>> the older versions alone as well. Following the email info, I ended up
>> with this:
>>
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, is:
> kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
> the same as:
> kernel-2.6.11.4
> plus/minus the Gentoo-specific patches?
possibly not. the gentoo-sources package has its own revision numbers
(the -r* bit). that&
Le jeudi 14 avril 2005 à 15:17 -0400, Trey Gruel a écrit :
> On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, is:
> > kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
> > the same as:
> > kernel-2.6.11.4
> > plus/minus the Gentoo-specific patches?
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:36:21AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:27:28 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
> > If I understood the instruction above, 'emerge --noreplace
> > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.13' should have added 'gentoo-sources&#x
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 11:08, S. Schwartz wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > which patches?
> > What would you missing?
>
> I don't really know, not even if those would be important to me. But I
> kind of trust into the work of the Gentoo-guys and believe th
Fredrik Axelsson schreef:
> I'm trying to emerge gentoo-sources with the -doc use flag set.
>
> emerge -pv gentoo-sources shows that gentoo-sources will be emerged
> without the doc use flag.
>
> "-doc" is set both in my make.conf USE variable and in
> /et
emerge --depclean wants to remove the gentoo-sources for my old kernel
[sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.13] which I want to hang on to for the
time being.
Is there a way to instruct emerge not to remove them?
emerge(1)
Packages that are part of the world set will always be kept. They can be
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 6/19/19 11:27 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> On 6/19/19 11:37 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>>> echo '>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.15' >>
>>> /etc/portage/package.mask/kernels
>>
>> Perfect!
>>
>> Than
this way:
# grep -i gentoo-sources /var/lib/portage/world
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:4.14.105-r1
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:4.14.114
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:4.14.83
I removed all other kernel packages manually so only those three are
installed.
However, portage still wants to install the latest g
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:23:49PM -0600, Justin Findlay wrote:
> On 5/2/06, Leopold Gouverneur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >How can I prevent emerge from merging gentoo-sources (I now use sources
> >from ftp.kernel.org).I tried --unmerge whithout success.
>
> Try &#x
I did an emerge sync a few days ago. If I run emerge -s gentoo- sources
I get:
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Latest version available: 2.4.31-r1
Latest version installed: 2.6.14-r2
Size of downloaded files: 31,219 kB
Homepage:http://www.kernel.org/ http://www.gentoo.org
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:00:02 +0200, Arnau Bria wrote:
> > So you have sys-kernel/suspend2-sources-2.6.19-r3 still installed,
> > probably left over from some emerge in the past.
>
> Not sure why I do have a concrete verison of gentoo sources installed
> blocking new one..
Holly Bostick wrote:
> The "vanilla" sources are the same sources you would get on kernel.org.
> No extra patches (as you would find in gentoo-dev-sources) or
> optimizations/patches (as you would find in ck-sources) and no "bleeding
> edge" patches (as you wou
Albert Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> I want to `unmerge' (-C) versions of gentoo-sources prior to -2.6.20-r6
>>
>> However this fails:
>>
>> root # emerge -vpC "<"gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r6
>>
>> >>>
On Thursday 09 February 2006 16:40, Ron Bickers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] GnuPG
depends on gentoo-sources?':
> I haven't had gentoo-sources installed on one of my machines for a
> while, but all of sudden today it wants to install it. I mask
I have run sys-kernel/ck-sources for years and it has been working well. Just
updated and got this message:
!!! The following installed packages are masked:
- sys-kernel/ck-sources-5.4.48::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
/var/db/repos/gentoo/profiles/package.mask:
# Joonas Niilola
On 2008-08-04, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Suddenly (starting today) "emerge -auvtND world" wants to
>> install an older version of gentoo-sources (2.6.25-r6), and I
>> can't figure out why:
[...]
>> What clue am I missing?
>>
Gah, must b tired to miss that - first place I looked :(
tkx
billk
- Original message -
> > How can I find out what vanilla version gentoo-sources was built
> > against?
> >
> > specifically 2.6.38-gentoo-r6 (i.e., is it 2.6.37.6) as I want to pull
> >
On Friday 01 Aug 2014 18:15:12 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] --exclude gentoo-sources
> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:12:06 +0300
> From: Alexander Kapshuk
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>
>
On 10/11/20 10:06 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 12:23 PM Daniel Frey wrote:
The problem is it's always trying to pull in unstable packages when I
have two slotted kernels in world:
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:5.4.48
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:5.4.66
I tried masking ke
> Linus releases a new kernel, and gentoo-sources takes at least a few
> weeks, sometimes more.
When was it that you noticed gentoo-sources being that far behind.
Generally-speaking vanilla-sources and gentoo-sources tend to be
updated within a day or two of a new stable kernel release. No
Holly Bostick wrote:
Fredrik Axelsson schreef:
I'm trying to emerge gentoo-sources with the -doc use flag set.
emerge -pv gentoo-sources shows that gentoo-sources will be emerged
without the doc use flag.
"-doc" is set both in my make.conf USE variable and in
/etc/portage/pac
m unless it actually has, and the problem is Portage not knowing
it somehow
Would you do an
ls /usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/
and post the output?
I'm just wondering if the ebuilds are physically there or not.
I have the uninformed naging thought that I am having this pro
On Fri February 10 2006 02:59, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I just checked the .ebuild in my portage tree does not list gentoo-sources
> as direct dependency of gunpg-1.4.2.r3. Please do a emerge -pvt
> =app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.2-r3 and give us the output (you might have to unmask
On Monday 12 June 2006 16:38, Richard Ruth wrote:
>On one of two gentoo (x86_64 AMD Opteron) systems I just emerged the new
> portage-2.1 on, emerge is requiring gentoo-sources as a dependency required
> by "x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7". Why?
>
>The 2nd system with an id
Kai Peter wrote:
> On 2019-06-20 20:10, Dale wrote:
>> Kai Peter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude
>>>> gentoo-sources
>>>> from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the onl
a" sources are the same sources you would get on kernel.org.
> No extra patches (as you would find in gentoo-dev-sources) or
> optimizations/patches (as you would find in ck-sources) and no "bleeding
> edge" patches (as you would find in mm-sources).
>
> The kernel d
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:20:11PM -0500, John Jolet wrote:
> okay, I was wondering how to get the other kernel versions. it's emerge
> gentoo-sources (space) 2.6.11 is it?
hum, that's funny, I was going to tell you
emerge =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.11
but equery list -
On 5/15/05, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
> > The "vanilla" sources are the same sources you would get on kernel.org.
> > No extra patches (as you would find in gentoo-dev-sources) or
> > optimizations/patches (as you would
Sorry folks - I guess I've made a right "dogs dinner" of this whole thread...
I'll make more efforts not to be "that noob" next time :-)
But I've got the information I needed about how to build old
gentoo-sources kernels. So thanks!
I've done my tests an
zles me:
>
> [ebuild NS] sys-kernel-sources-3.2.16 [3.2.6, 3.3.4] [...]
>
> What would cause something like this, when I'm booting 3.3.4?
>
I'd say you still have a slotted package of gentoo-sources-3.2.*
installed. So portage will upgrade gentoo-sources-3.2.* an
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:30:26AM -0800, Penguin Lover jerry squawked:
> THanks for the quick reply. I did another emerge --sync and
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jerry # emerge -s gentoo-sources
> Searching...
> [ Results for search key : gentoo-sources ]
> [ Applications found
On 7/14/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As of this morning, the latest Kernel version in portage is 2.6.16-r12.
Using gentoo-sources? Check /usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/ChangeLog:
*gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r12 (06 Jul 2006)
06 Jul 2006; Daniel Drake &
On 2008-08-03, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suddenly (starting today) "emerge -auvtND world" wants to
> install an older version of gentoo-sources (2.6.25-r6), and I
> can't figure out why:
>
># emerge --search gentoo-sources
>Search
I've been having serious problems with newer versions of
gentoo-sources (basically 2.6.12-r9 and 2.6.12-r10), so I have
downgraded to 2.6.12-r4, which is rock solid for me. So, I thought to
add something like this atom to /etc/portage/package.mask:
>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4
Remy Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is gentoo-sources in your world file?
>
> $ grep gentoo-sources /var/lib/portage/world
>
> If not, the behavior you see is normal. Just add
> "sys-kernel/gentoo-sources" to the world file.
Shouldn't gentoo-sources
;t do it by itself. I guess I should not simply download the
> sources mentioned by MArk
> and do it, as this might break something.
> Also, in how far is it important to apply the other patches, which are
> applied to gentoo-sources?
>
> Karsten
>
Karsten,
My inputs wer
On 02/17/2016 04:22 PM, Grant wrote:
> Does anyone know which versions of hardened-sources and gentoo-sources
> are not vulnerable to this:
>
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-0728
>
> - Grant
>
A quick google led me to these:
https://gitweb.gento
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:26:03 +0100, Jarry wrote:
> [ebuild N ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.7.10:3.7.10 USE="-build
> -deblob -symlink" 68,335 kB
> [ebuild N ] virtual/linux-sources-0 0 kB
> [ebuild R] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE="tools zlib -debug
On Wednesday 26 Apr 2017 11:51:54 Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-04-26 10:53, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > # revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc++.so.6' -- --exclude="gcc gentoo-
> > sources" --jobs --load-average=48
> >
> > ...only to find that gentoo-so
On 21/04/2020 18:05, Gerion Entrup wrote:
what is the difference between these three packages? I don't get it from the
description alone.
gentoo-sources: A linux kernel source tree with Gentoo patchset
gentoo-kernel-bin: A linux kernel binary image with initramfs?
gentoo-kernel: ???
Th
On 6/19/19 11:37 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
echo '>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.15' >> /etc/portage/package.mask/kernels
Perfect!
Thank you. :-)
I did name the file /etc/portage/package.mask/gentoo-sources as I like
to name the file after the package that i
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> > I know I can use this option to protect kernel sources I
> > want to keep around, from removal, via depclean.
> put gentoo-sources in world, you then always get the latest.
> test each one , decide which are worth keeping. Let's
gt;> The wording is horrible, but as the suffix ("-bin") would suggest, the
>> former is
>> a binary .xpak package, whereas the latter is base kernel
>> sources with
>> additional Gentoo developers' patches.
>
> I still don't understand w
I am running gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.11-r4. As announced, gentoo-dev-sources
has disappeared from sys/kernel leaving gentoo-sources. However, the Online
Database lists 2.4.28-r8 as the latest stable build. I just ran emerge uDvp
world and I am offered "NS ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2
--- jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did an emerge sync a few days ago. If I run emerge
> -s gentoo- sources
> I get:
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> Latest version available: 2.4.31-r1
> Latest version installed: 2.6.14-r2
> Size
; hurt; a new vanilla-sources version is usually ready a few hours after
>> Linus releases a new kernel, and gentoo-sources takes at least a few
>> weeks, sometimes more.
>
> When was it that you noticed gentoo-sources being that far behind.
As I said, I switched to vanilla-source
à 15:17 -0400, Trey Gruel a écrit :
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, is:
kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
the same as:
kernel-2.6.11.4
plus/minus the Gentoo-specific patches?
possibly not. the gentoo-sources package has its own revision numbers
(
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:59:56 +0200
Remy Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > So, "emerge -pv gentoo-sources" wants to install the new kernel
> > source, while "emerge -DuN world" doesn't. How come?
>
> Is gentoo-sources
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:28:20AM +0200, Leopold Gouverneur wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:23:49PM -0600, Justin Findlay wrote:
> > On 5/2/06, Leopold Gouverneur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >How can I prevent emerge from merging gentoo-sources (I now use sources
On 3/17/24 09:47, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
I get a stackdump booting the gentoo-sources-6.8.x kernels, and I'm
wondering how to go about reporting. Pretty sure this can't be
gentoo-specific, but kernel.org seems adamant that I should report to
gentoo.
gentoo-sources has lots
ormal? I know that swsup2 patches are in the suspend-sources kernel.
> But according to the documentation software suspend v1 should be supported
> in the gentoo-sources.
Using gentoo-sources i got the same problem. You are using SMP, right ?
Then you have to enable CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU to get
on 01/28/2014 09:36 PM Andrew Tselischev wrote the following:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Thanasis wrote:
>> Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
>> 3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
>> the
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:05:42 +0800, Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> So,you meant I have to install mm-sources,but gentoo-sources?
Yes, install mm-sources and use that instead of gentoo-sources.
alternatively apply only the resier4 patch to gentoo-sources. Trying to
apply the whole mm patchset to gen
Daniel Iliev wrote:
> So, "emerge -pv gentoo-sources" wants to install the new kernel source,
> while "emerge -DuN world" doesn't. How come?
Is gentoo-sources in your world file?
$ grep gentoo-sources /var/lib/portage/world
If not, the behavior you see is norm
1 - 100 of 6337 matches
Mail list logo
