I find references to
man openrc and man 8 openrc-run.
'man openrc' nor 'man 8 openrc-run' return anything.
I have version 0.12.4 on my system. I have neither
of these locally installed, and I am not sure why?
Does upgrade to openrc-0.13.6 fix this? Is it
advisable (how sta
>
> Hi,
>
> for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2
> finally.
>
> On gentoo web I found this: 2.
> Migration to OpenRC
> Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in
> as part of your regular upgrade process by your package
On Saturday 10 October 2009 12:01:19 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2
> finally.
>
> On gentoo web I found this: 2.
> Migration to OpenRC
> Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulle
Hi,
for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2
finally.
On gentoo web I found this: 2.
Migration to OpenRC
Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in
as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager.
I tried to check this (emerge
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Sun 27 Nov 2011 09:06:39 PM IST, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but
completely gone from portage.
What happened to it?
0.9.6? I updated my tree 24h before writing this reply. It's still not
there. Only
On Saturday 10 October 2009, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2
> finally.
>
> On gentoo web I found this: 2.
> Migration to OpenRC
> Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in
>
taozhijiang tp-link.com.cn> writes:
>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenRC
>> Anyone tested openrc on Arch linux? I have read in several places
>> that Arch linux has moved to systemd, exclusively?
> why ask this question in Gentoo user land?
Openrc is d
On 12/26/2014 07:10 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> Just curious; is this even possible? `emerge --depclean --ask --verbose
> sys-apps/openrc` gives:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 pulled in by:
> @system requir
On 12/26/2014 11:38 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel
> mailto:a...@alectenharmsel.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Just curious; is this even possible? `emerge --depclean --ask --verbose
> > sys-apps/openrc` gives:
> >
>
AFAIR OpenRC exists in Arch repo for a long time. I mean, even after
changing to systemd by default you could install and use OpenRC as init.
22.01.2015 1:32, James пишет:
It seems Openrc is spreading?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenRC
Anyone tested openrc on Arch linux? I have
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/26/2014 11:38 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel
wrote:
> >
> > Just curious; is this even possible? `emerge --depclean --ask --verbose
> Any caveats with openrc we should be aware of?
# genlop -l | grep openrc
Thu Apr 24 14:05:53 2008 >>> sys-apps/openrc-0.2.2
I've been running baselayout2/openrc oder 2.5 years now without any
problems. Of course this does not mean it will run smoothly on your
gentoo
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:37 on Friday 22 October 2010, Zeerak
Mustafa Waseem did opine thusly:
> > > I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question:
> > > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce55de133ca592b638db758c9e457
> > >
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel
wrote:
>
> Just curious; is this even possible? `emerge --depclean --ask --verbose
> sys-apps/openrc` gives:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 pulled in by:
> @system req
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:13:16 +0200
Michael Hampicke wrote:
> > Any caveats with openrc we should be aware of?
>
> # genlop -l | grep openrc
> Thu Apr 24 14:05:53 2008 >>> sys-apps/openrc-0.2.2
>
> I've been running baselayout2/openrc oder 2.5 years no
On 11/16/19 13:50, Mick wrote:
It is not simply a matter of different names, but of different binaries. As
far as I understand it, the /sbin/init of sys-apps/sysvinit is used by openrc
unless you have modified your system to use openrc-init (a different binary to
/sbin/init) as explained here
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> When rebooting, I noticed the "openrc" program was moved from "/sbin/openrc"
> to "/usr/sbin/openrc". I understand this is related to the merge-usr stuff,
> but
> I am planning on doing this change later.
> The profile I s
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:54:25PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:19:51 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
> > > ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> > > so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that
> > > when
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:59:18PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:37 on Friday 22 October 2010, Zeerak
> Mustafa Waseem did opine thusly:
>
> > > > I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question:
> > > > http
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Rich.
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 15:02:23 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:47 PM Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>> Portage has just unmerged my openrc-0.34.11. I didn't ask it to.
>> Did you change any config file
hi,
How can I resolve this blocker:
(sys-process/procps-3.3.9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
sys-process/procps required by (dev-db/mysql-5.5.39::gentoo, installed)
sys-process/procps required by @system
(sys-apps/openrc-0.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
Just curious; is this even possible? `emerge --depclean --ask --verbose
sys-apps/openrc` gives:
Calculating dependencies... done!
sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 pulled in by:
@system requires sys-apps/openrc
net-misc/netifrc-0.2.2 requires >=sys-apps/openrc-0
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller did
opine thusly:
On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when
the
-5.5.39::gentoo, installed)
> > sys-process/procps required by @system
> >
> > (sys-apps/openrc-0.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
> > sys-apps/openrc required by @system
> > sys-apps/openrc required by @selected
> > sys
On 2019-11-16 12:50, Mick wrote:
> > Question: when does the init program run under the name openrc-init?
>
> It is not simply a matter of different names, but of different
> binaries. As far as I understand it, the /sbin/init of
> sys-apps/sysvinit is used by openrc unless
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>> Any caveats with openrc we should be aware of?
>
> # genlop -l | grep openrc
> Thu Apr 24 14:05:53 2008 >>> sys-apps/openrc-0.2.2
>
> I've been running baselayout2/openrc oder 2.5 years now without
Emre Eryilmaz piesso.com> writes:
> > Anyone tested openrc on Arch linux?
> Did you read the web page's beginning ? :)
> " Note: Arch uses systemd by default. If you use OpenRC, please
> mention so while asking for help."
I think that stating what codes
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:43 PM Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> openrc scripts have their own "API". Converting a straight sysvinit
> script into an openrc one takes some work. Look at some existing
> openrc script to see the kind of work that is needed.
Unless the upstream scri
2015-01-22 0:32 GMT+02:00 James :
> It seems Openrc is spreading?
>
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenRC
>
> Anyone tested openrc on Arch linux? I have read in several places
> that Arch linux has moved to systemd, exclusively?
Did you read the web page's be
stem
>
> (sys-apps/openrc-0.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
> sys-apps/openrc required by @system
> sys-apps/openrc required by @selected
> sys-apps/openrc required by (virtual/service-manager-0::gentoo, installed)
> >=sys-apps/openr
On 12/05/2014 01:34 PM, James wrote:
> I find references to
> man openrc and man 8 openrc-run.
>
> 'man openrc' nor 'man 8 openrc-run' return anything.
Curiosity piqued:
> commit 3470eda3f5cea437a6de132b1ead3f27effd3902
> Author: William Hubbs
&g
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 08:42:57 CET Matthias Hanft wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > When rebooting, I noticed the "openrc" program was moved from
> > "/sbin/openrc" to "/usr/sbin/openrc". I understand this is related to the
> > merge-usr
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:00:23AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> You need an OpenRC use flag to install OpenRC init scripts? That's
>> simply a li
why ask this question in Gentoo user land?
2015-01-22
Thanks & Best Regards.
Email: taozhijiang@tp-link.{net, com.cn}
发件人： James
发送时间： 2015-01-22 06:33:22
收件人： gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
抄送：
主题： [gentoo-user] Openrc now on Arch LInux
It seems Openrc is spreading?
h
It seems Openrc is spreading?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenRC
Anyone tested openrc on Arch linux? I have read in several places
that Arch linux has moved to systemd, exclusively?
James
On Monday 12 October 2009 07:33:33 Eray Aslan wrote:
> On 10.10.2009 13:01, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > On gentoo web I found this: 2.
> > Migration to OpenRC
> > Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in
> > as part of your regu
Dear all,
It's been a while since I built a Gentoo machine from scratch so need a
bit of guidance.
I want to build a machine, amd64, that uses OpenRC, LLVM & Musl.
Looking on the Downloads page and in turn the "Advanced choices", there
is two separate Stage 3 arc
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller did
opine thusly:
> On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> > so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when
> > the
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:52 on Friday 22 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller
> > did
> >
> > opine thusly:
> >> On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Both
tem so am building
>>> that one up.]
>>>
>>> On my main system (currently running openrc) I have masked all of
>>> gnome-3.8. I wonder if this was an error and I can remove the
>>> mask. Is it the case that
>>>
>>> 1. Running openrc
After surviving the initial update to openrc I've now found after an
update world that the latest openrc no longer links /etc/init.d/lo to
/lib/rc/sh/net.sh.
In fact /lib/rc/sh/net.sh is completely gone. So I'm left with
several useless symlinks in /etc/init.d and no indication of
Hello,
Well here it seems that openrc is going ~arch
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-688090.html
So has it been decided that openrc is the way forward?
Any caveats with openrc we should be aware of?
James
n principle. A system
> daemon may operate differently under openrc than systemd. When I run
>
> emerge -pv syslog-ng
>
> I see that a "systemd" USE flag exists, but not an "openrc" USE flag.
> I think that's the root of the problem. The default is to support
he boot is the kernel, not OpenRC. The
OpenRC script just manages the seed and does not print that string. So, most probably
OpenRC is never started.
- from the chroot I invoked /sbin/openrc . It spits out errors due to the chroot
environment but other than that seems to work fine for all runleve
On 22/12/2015 00:37, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 21 Dec 2015 21:43:00 Kai Krakow wrote:
>> Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500
>>
>> schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:06:25PM +, James wrote
>>>
>>>> From what I read/
Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500
schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:06:25PM +, James wrote
>
> > From what I read/understand openrc is in the process of removal from
> > @system, for all profiles?
>
> In Lennart's dreams... and many
my main system (currently running openrc) I have masked all of
>> gnome-3.8. I wonder if this was an error and I can remove the
>> mask. Is it the case that
>>
>> 1. Running openrc instead of systemd means you must mask gnome-3.8
>>
>> or
>>
>> 2.
) pulled in by
> > >
> > > sys-process/procps required by (dev-db/mysql-5.5.39::gentoo,
> > > installed) sys-process/procps required by @system
> > >
> > > (sys-apps/openrc-0.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> > >
Hi list,
do you know some guide to switch form systemd to openrc, or keep both? I
googled and I didn't find.
The motivation is that I'm studing many server stuff, and I'm tired of
search for alternatives to systemd (that is really good). I also set up
some servers, using ope
I am currently having cgroup problems with openrc and lxc. The basic
cause is /sys/fs/cgroup/openrc mounts inside an lxc container as read
only. I should be able to override this "somewhere", but where is not
obvious :(
The main problem is these failures in the mail server running
On 2021-07-25 13:26+0100 Wols Lists wrote:
> On 25/07/21 12:47, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >> They are, @system is a set of packages and nothing it it will be
> >> > depcleaned. However, openrc is not part of @system, the virtual
> >> > is.
>
> &g
Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:59:39 -0600
schrieb »Q« :
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:40:30 +
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> >
> > > > From what I read/understand openrc is in the process of removal
>
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:00:23AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote
> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> You need an OpenRC use flag to in
On 11/26/2012 02:55 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
[blocks B ]
net-tools requires openrc >= 0.9.9.3. Your installed openrc, and
proposed update, is too old.
Upgrade to openrc-0.11.5... It came online on Saturday.
That post is 2 years old. IMHO something that's not been stabalized in that long of a period of time
is worth waiting for unless you full on ~arch already.
That said, I use Calculate linux which is mostly stable but has OpenRC by default and I don't have
any issues.
On 10/22/10 12
i,
>>>>>
>>>>> How can I resolve this blocker:
>>>>>
>>>>> (sys-process/procps-3.3.9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>>>>> sys-process/procps required by (dev-db/mysql-5.5.39::gentoo,
>>> installed)
>>>
o, installed) pulled in by
>> > sys-process/procps required by (dev-db/mysql-5.5.39::gentoo,
>installed)
>> > sys-process/procps required by @system
>> >
>> > (sys-apps/openrc-0.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>pulled in by
>> >
; > > (sys-process/procps-3.3.9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> > > >
> > > > sys-process/procps required by (dev-db/mysql-5.5.39::gentoo,
> > > > installed) sys-process/procps required by @system
> > > >
> > > >
2015-01-22 4:23 GMT-06:00 James :
> Emre Eryilmaz piesso.com> writes:
>
>
>> > Anyone tested openrc on Arch linux?
>
>> Did you read the web page's beginning ? :)
>> " Note: Arch uses systemd by default. If you use OpenRC, please
>> mention s
2009/1/19 kashani
> Peter Alfredsen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:28:05 -0800
>> kashani wrote:
>>
>> I've been putting off the openrc upgrade on my vserver
>>> account for some time and think it's finally come around to bite me.
&g
gt; > "runscript is deprecated; please use openrc-run instead"
> > >
> > > What shall I do to fix this issue accept for reinstallig
> > > my Gentoo system anew?
> >
> > Do nothing.
>
> Thank you for your answer but why that message appea
own anymore. What do I have to do to have it
> >> issue a shutdown? This is an openrc system.
> >>
> >> I have this, but it doesn't work:
> >>
> >> $ cat /etc/acpi/events/powerbtn
> >> event=button[ /]power.*
> >> action=/sbin
On Monday 21 Dec 2015 21:43:00 Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500
>
> schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:06:25PM +, James wrote
> >
> > > From what I read/understand openrc is in the process of removal from
&
On 5/23/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After surviving the initial update to openrc I've now found after an
> update world that the latest openrc no longer links /etc/init.d/lo to
> /lib/rc/sh/net.sh.
>
> In fact /lib/rc/sh/net.sh is complete
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:19:51 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> > so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that
> > when the devs decide to flip a keyword.
>
> I thought this was a matter of debate - Openrc
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:00:23AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> You need an OpenRC use flag to install OpenRC init scripts? That's
> simply a lie.
An apology to Daniel might be in order. I start my USE flag with
Am 08.08.2015 um 19:05 schrieb walt:
> I just noticed that net-misc/netifrc installs two systemd service files,
> which puzzled me. Is this in preparation for virtualizing openrc?
This is to provide systemd users with the corresponding service files
like OpenRC users get the necessar
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:40:30 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
>
> > > From what I read/understand openrc is in the process of removal
> > > from @system, for all profiles?
> >
> > In
collecting zillions of
copies of the same logfile under different names in my daily backups.
Up to now trying the same with the OpenRC logfile "/var/log/rc.log"
failed however: I tried using a named pipe instead of "/var/log/rc.log",
but it didn't work out. The system
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> > From what I read/understand openrc is in the process of removal from
> > @system, for all profiles?
>
> In Lennart's dreams... and many peoples' nightmares.
It's got nothing to do with L
Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:37:38 +
schrieb Mick :
> On Monday 21 Dec 2015 21:43:00 Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:34 -0500
> >
> > schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:06:25PM +, James wrote
> > >
> >
On 10.10.2009 13:01, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> On gentoo web I found this: 2.
> Migration to OpenRC
> Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in
> as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager.
PPP startup scripts still do n
start
>
> The message occurs because /etc/init.d/udev checks for
> /etc/init.d/sysfs, which is not present.
>
> Googling indicates that /etc/init.d/sysf comes from sys-apps/openrc. I
> have openrc-0.3.0-r1 installed (from long ago). openrc-0.6.0-r1 is
> available, though keywo
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:55:50PM +0100, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
>
> I just emerged --sync and now when I try to update world, I get this
> conflict:
>
> where both sys-apps/net-tools and sys-apps/baselayout-2.1-r1 therefore
> sys-apps/openrc are required by the syste
stem,
> > > > I get the following message message:
> > > >
> > > > "runscript is deprecated; please use openrc-run instead"
> > > >
> > > > What shall I do to fix this issue accept for reinstallig
> > > > my Gento
(Replying nowhere in particular)
This is indeed a bug, but not the ones that have been suggested. The
underlying problem is that the DJB programs (mail-mta/netqmail, but
also net-dns/djbdns, for example) require a particular service manager.
When OpenRC is installed only as a side effect of being
would be a living nightmare when
> you look at how many profile use flags there are.
There are already some situations where 2 programs cannot co-exist,
e.g. 2 MTAs. This may be a similar situation in principle. A system
daemon may operate differently under openrc than systemd. When I run
emer
Am Sonntag, 28. Dezember 2008 12:50:41 schrieb Ian Lee:
> 2) Openrc problem
> I'm asuming here the openrc problems are from a recent upgrade you have
> done and not inslalled the the runlevels required sadly they are not
> done automatically. Have a look in /usr/share/openrc/ru
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Sonntag, 28. Dezember 2008 12:50:41 schrieb Ian Lee:
2) Openrc problem
I'm asuming here the openrc problems are from a recent upgrade you have
done and not inslalled the the runlevels required sadly they are not
done automatically. Have a look in /usr/share/o
On Friday 09 May 2014 23:25:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2014 21:56:45 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > What is the meaning of this change?
> >
> > [ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-212-r1 [208] USE="acl firmware-loader
> > gudev introspection kmod -doc (-selinux) -st
;>>> gnome-3.8. I first want to try systemd on a test system so am building
>>>> that one up.]
>>>>
>>>> On my main system (currently running openrc) I have masked all of
>>>> gnome-3.8. I wonder if this was an error and I can remove the
&
After 10+ years of LXDE/OpenRC I decided to give Gnome/systemd a try.
1. With OpenRC I used hdparm to put an external USB disk to sleep:
$ cat /etc/conf.d/hdparm
sdb_args="-S24"
Looks like systemd does not provide a unit file for hdparm yet, right? If so I suppose
I'll have
On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 15:03 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have any pointers on where to start on converting a 10-15
> year old SysV style init script to OpenRC?
I'd start with "man openrc-run", and then read the service-script-
guide.md that is shi
On 25/07/21 12:47, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> They are, @system is a set of packages and nothing it it will be
>> > depcleaned. However, openrc is not part of @system, the virtual is.
> Ah, that's it. So we have critical system packages which aren't part of
> @system
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis
wrote:
>
> Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! Have a
> look:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems
>
> There is no D-Bus under "Main dependencies" for OpenRC (I reall
On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when
> the devs decide to flip a keyword.
I thought this was a matter of debate - Openrc was IIRC the creation of Roy
Mar
er:
> >> >
> >> > (sys-process/procps-3.3.9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> >> > sys-process/procps required by (dev-db/mysql-5.5.39::gentoo,
> >installed)
> >> > sys-process/procps required by @system
> >> >
> >>
On Monday 21 December 2015 14:06:25 James wrote:
> H. I would think most folks running openrc are also not using udev
> but are using eudev [1]? From what I read/understand openrc is in the
> process of removal from @system, for all profiles?
I don't know about that, but I
according to whether you use openrc or systemd.
This reflects the ongoing gentoo effort to support both openrc and
systemd, which should be interesting to watch. (I hope.)
There is another useflag I've never noticed before, the 'openrc'
useflag, which is used by udev to install &quo
> looking
> > at the script, I see some problems, you run the OpenRC restart
> > commands
> > even if systemd is available, further it doesn't know which one is
> > running, as both can be installed(And are installed if using
> > systemd),
> That's what
dev init-script is written for baselayout-2!
> > * Please do not use it with baselayout-1!.
> > * ERROR: udev failed to start
> >
> > The message occurs because /etc/init.d/udev checks for
> > /etc/init.d/sysfs, which is not present.
> >
> > Googling ind
n
> I pretend that systemd is udev and continue using OpenRC as with udev
> itself? I would then apply just udev 204 to 208 update instructions
> (http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade).
>
> I am using WindowMaker and systemd was pulled in by
> gnome-settings-daemon which in
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:47:59AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On last question/confirmation -
>
> There are a few updates other than just the baselayout/OpenRC updates
> pending... can I still emerge those now, prior to the baselayout update,
> like normal?
Yes, as long as the
t;>> gudev introspection kmod -doc (-selinux) -static-libs (-openrc%*)"
>>> 2,660 kB
>> It means the openrc USE flag is no longer used. From the Changelog:
>>
>> " Punt USE="openrc" and always pull in sys-fs/udev-init-scripts to match
>> be
>> * start-stop-daemon: fopen 'var/run/dbus.pid' : No such file or
>>>> directory Detaching to start '/usr/bin/dbus-daemon ...'
>>>> * runscript is deprecated; please use openrc-run instead.
>>>> How do I put this right?
>
> Hmmm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey dudes, i'm using at to openrc-0.5.3 this /etc/conf.d/net configuration:
config_bond0="192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0"
slaves_bond0="eth0 eth2"
routes_bond0="default via 192.168.1.1"
But now, with
chopenrc/
> >
> > PS. I do not wish to kick off a flame war on this topic, enough electrons
> > have been wasted in past rants. Just to inform those who may be
> > interested in this.
>
> Interesting. It looks like they bundle all their openrc scripts in
> the ope
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:38 AM, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
[ snip ]
> From what has been happening with the systemd stuff, I do not see what
> advantages it really offers over the SysV scheme and its successors like
> OpenRC. Someone enlighten me please?
I wrote the following some mont
*really* kills all the processes
> > associated to a service, something that OpenRC, by design, cannot do.
> [...]
>
> I wonder if that's accurate. I know that OpenRC also uses cgroups for
grouping
> services, but how much does it actually exploit them?
According to [1]:
"&q
Hi group,
I used the repo offered by Tony Marples to update openrc(0.5.2-r2 ->
0.5.2.4df8778) using git. It did a fine job except it failed to update
/etc/init.d/net.lo. The original instance remains.
Under /var/git/openrc all the init services were updated from
.in to and installed in /
1 - 100 of 1786 matches
Mail list logo
