er those packages as critical (gcc was *not* built
after the glibc upgrade!), so I succeeded to downgrade glibc at last.
But now "emerge -1 apache" doesn't work because "patch" is needed,
and "patch" is still looking for glibc 2.28. And "emerge -1 patch"
s
var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1/work/lm_sensors-3.1.2 ...
* Applying lm_sensors-3.1.2-sensors-detect-gentoo.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch ...
* Failed Patch: lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch !
*
I noticed this error with the autoheader as shown below:
* Applying xulrunner-1.9.2-gtk+-2.21.patch ... [ ok ]
* Running eautoreconf in '/var/tmp/portage/www-
client/firefox-3.6.12/work/mozilla-1.9.2' ...
* Runnin
re are the contents of the output file:
# cat amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch-8250.out
* amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch *
=====
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch <
/usr/portage/mail-filte
On 11/01 04:05, David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> [..]
> >Thanks a lot for the extensive help, SIR! :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> [..]
> >The patch itself was found (so the local thing works fine) and failed.
> >
>
6 ;-)
>>> Previously fetched file: openssh-4.3p2.tar.gz size ;-)
>>> Downloading
http://ftp.club-internet.fr/pub/mirrors/gentoo/distfiles/openssh-lpk-4.3p1-0.3.7.patch
--00:18:01--
http://ftp.club-internet.fr/pub/mirrors/gentoo/distfiles/openssh-l
pqq.patch ...
[ ok ]
* Patching with qmail lf bug workaround.
* Applying amavisd-new-2.2.1-qmail-lf-workaround.patch ...
* Failed Patch: amavisd-new-2.2.1-qmail-lf-workaround.patch !
* (
/usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.2.1-qmail-lf-workaro
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:45 on Friday 29 October 2010, Mick did
opine thusly:
> I noticed this error with the autoheader as shown below:
>
> * Applying xulrunner-1.9.2-gtk+-2.21.patch ... [
> ok ] * Running eautoreconf in '/var/tmp/port
I've been unsuccessfully trying to build the latest security patch
version of Firefox 3.0. I keep getting the same error message after
3 days of re-syncing and retrying. The build dies early on in the
patch-appliaction stage, so log.txt is small. The error message also
mentioned to in
.
> * Applying amavisd-new-2.2.1-qmail-lf-workaround.patch ...
>
> * Failed Patch: amavisd-new-2.2.1-qmail-lf-workaround.patch !
> * (
> /usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.2.1-qmail-lf-workaround.patch
> )
> *
> * Include in your bugreport the cont
e/browse/trunk/README
Ok, I see they're shipping the same version which is available from
CPAN as the dev version (2.00.99_3). But the patch is still not made
for its code ... maybe it is for _2 or _1?
The patch keeps failing out of the box:
cpan -i Text::Patch
tar xvzf Typemap.tar.gz
tar xv
[snip]
> Am I making any sense?
I think all of that is right on. I need to find out why the patch
isn't working though.
> Theoretically (if you insist), you could still use the perl's
> Text::Patch route as well, but (if I'm not entirely wrong, see the
> excerpte
>> from the README:
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/google-api-adwords-perl/source/browse/trunk/README
>
> Ok, I see they're shipping the same version which is available from
> CPAN as the dev version (2.00.99_3). But the patch is still not made
> for its code ... maybe it is for
Also check the page where you found the patch carefully.
Sometimes you can find an updated ebuild that works with
that patch in the same page, so you don't have to patch it
yourself.
You need to examine the patch and clear up whether it's
a patch for the app or for the ebuild itself.
[ ok ]
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking Thunar-0.8.0.tar.bz2 to
/home/tmp/portage/xfce-base/thunar-0.8.0-r2/work
* Applying thunar-0.8.0-jpeg.patch ...
* Failed Patch: thunar-0.8.0-jpeg.patch !
* ( /usr/portage/xfce-base/thunar/files/thunar-0.8.0-jpeg.patc
From: Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] "xyz.la seems to be moved" message
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:24:31 -0500
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:31 +0200, Fabrice Delliaux wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Explanation && patch here :
>
ucture-synth/structure-synth-1.5.0.ebuild
> /usr/local/portage/media-gfx/structure-synth/Manifest
>
> Then:
>
> # mkdir /usr/local/portage/media-gfx/structure-synth/files
>
> drop my '.patch' into that ./files/ dir, drop my -r1.ebuild into
> /usr/local/portage/m
, Fabrice Delliaux wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Explanation && patch here :
> > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-libtool@gnu.org/msg00838.html
> >
> > I saved the patch at the above link to /root/libtool.patch, but I can't
> &g
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
> OK,
> So what is wrong with this patch:
What is the error message? :)
What I normally do is: unpack the affected tarball, copy the
affected files to .orig versions, make the necessary changes,
create a patch from above the topdir with 'diff -u' b
t; Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] "xyz.la seems to be moved" message
> > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:24:31 -0500
> >
> > > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:31 +0200, Fabrice Delliaux wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Explanation && patc
ut, what should be the content of /tmp/net_dev.patch?¿?
>
> You list two patches.
>
> The one for the ebuild you should apply to the ebuild manually
> using 'patch', but you seem to have successfully done that already.
Yep,
> Then copy the first patch (net_dev.patch)
O
> > it, I indirectly initiated a thread over at hardened ML:
> > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/09bbf3bfe59a938f11ac044e891db77e
> >
> > Will surely check it! And am CC'ing hardened about this patch at the
> > hardened ML. Maybe they patch and
11-r200::gentoo failed (compile phase):
* emake failed
I've tried this propose patch.
https://621532.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=511304
save it to a file patch.patch
went to directory:
cd /usr/portage/net-libs/webkit-gtk/
patch -p0 < patch.patch
It ask me what file I want to patch, I
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:57:56 -0700 (PDT), Leonardo wrote:
> I'm trying to apply a patch from gentoo bugzilla on a ebuild
> that's in portage, but cannot find infos on how to do it.
If you are trying to patch the ebuild itself:
Download the patch file
cd to the directory contai
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 17:27, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
> > OK,
> > So what is wrong with this patch:
>
> What is the error message? :)
>
> What I normally do is: unpack the affected tarball, copy the
> affected files to .orig versio
On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 10:00:37 GMT Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> I've adapted this patch for kernel 6.6.13. All of the parent post still
> applies, with the exception of the version numbers.
>
> The main patch for the new kernel is 6.6.13-GPM.20240123.diff.
>
> Addit
2010/10/15 Fatih Tümen :
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> Got it, you hit the bug 340899 and its already fixed, just apply the patch
>>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=c54c1af789b306a85e9d7e79fb54f02a05346616
&g
[ ok ]
* Applying iptraf-2.7.0-2.6.patch ...
* Failed Patch: iptraf-2.7.0-2.6.patch !
* ( /usr/portage/net-analyzer/iptraf/files/iptraf-2.7.0-2.6.patch )
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/iptraf-2.7.0-r1/temp/iptraf-2.7.0-2.6.patch-14025.out
# svn update
> At revision 6786.
> test src # cd ..
> test src # svn co https://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter/trunk/patch-o-matic-ng
> test src # cd patch-o-matic-ng
> test patch-o-matic-ng # svn update
> At revision 6786.
> test patch-o-matic-ng # ./runme TARPIT
> Hey! KERNEL_DIR
Hello,
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
[..]
>Thanks a lot for the extensive help, SIR! :)
Thanks.
[..]
>The patch itself was found (so the local thing works fine) and failed.
>
>The *.patch.out is attached to the email and after looking into it I
>think you will fin
On Tue, 8 May 2007 17:56:36 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
> > Ok, but, what is the content of net_dev.patch?
>
> It's right there in your original mail:
[...]
> That IS what the patch file looks like. It will alter your Mak
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Got it, you hit the bug 340899 and its already fixed, just apply the patch
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=c54c1af789b306a85e9d7e79fb54f02a05346616
>>
>> --
>> Fati
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 08:56 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
> Hi I was reading the bug report 114915 at gentoo bugzilla and it
> mentions a patch to ebuid, I had downloaded the patch but I don't have
> any clue about how can I apply it to current ebuid.
well, how confident are y
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Jim John wrote:
> Hi. I want to patch cyrus-imapd. I have the diff file, but no source
> because I emerged from the repository. How do I get the source and
> ebuild it? Thanks.
The best way to do this is to modify the ebuild to apply the patch.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 12:01:54 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I've tried this propose patch.
> https://621532.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=511304
>
> save it to a file patch.patch
> went to directory:
> cd /usr/portage/net-libs/webkit-gtk/
> patch -p0 &l
o, and for almost ALL packages I get ..
> * Portage patch failed to apply (ltmain.sh version 1.5.24)!
> * Please bug azarah or vapier to add proper patch.
> *
> * ERROR: dev-libs/gmp-4.3.1 failed.
> * Call stack:
> * ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_unpack
> *
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's what
this m
.76/work/kernel/nv-pat.o]
> Error 1
>
> I saw a topic about that problem on Gentoo forum :
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7754020.html?sid=3b9fed3069c0b6644c1a41e839455b85
> I tried to apply the patch
> /etc/portage/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-340.76.p
Hi all,
I just did an emerge -sync and a porting update on two gentoo.
Some packages do not want to compile anymore.
Exemples
gcc :
* updating multilib directories to be: ../lib64 ../lib32
* Running elibtoolize in: gcc-4.9.4/
* Portage patch requested, but failed to apply!
* Please file a
Title: how to patch the asterisk ebuild
Hi all,
somebody know how to patch the software via ebuild. i need to patch the asterisk.1.2.13 in part of chan_sip.c for correct the silencesupp in the huawei softswitch. but i dont know how to correct in the ebuild
Thanks,
kitti
r5/work'
>>> Unpacking glib-1.2.10.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/glib-1.2.10-r5/work
+ y=glib-1.2.10.tar
+ y=tar
+ myfail='glib-1.2.10.tar.gz does not exist'
+ '[' gl = ./ ']'
+ srcdir=/var/tmp/portage/glib-1.2.10-r5/distdir/
+ [[ glib-1.2.10.tar.gz == /var/tmp/p
On 11/01 04:44, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 11/01 04:05, David Haller wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > [..]
> > >Thanks a lot for the extensive help, SIR! :)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [..]
> &g
ardened/message/09bbf3bfe59a938f11ac044e891db77e
>
> Will surely check it! And am CC'ing hardened about this patch at the
> hardened ML. Maybe they patch and forward the 4.4.8-r1 to 4.4.8-r2 .
> ---
> Only now looked at the patch.
>
> No, you don't get it. And I&#x
>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to
>> work clean. I thought you got it working before when you posted the
>> patched Typemap for me to download. Did it work then but not now?
>>
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
> guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
> gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
> that correct? Skipping the patch
On Saturday 24 January 2009 12:11:41 Rod wrote:
>I'm getting the following error too much, many packages are no longer
> insalling with this problem ;o(
> * Running elibtoolize in: libmcrypt-2.5.8
> * Applying install-sh-1.5.patch ...
>
> * Portage patch failed to a
Hi,
I am currently doing a python-updater run. While the rebuilding
of the several packages the process failed with
>>> Downloading
'http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/db/update/4.7.25/patch.4.7.25.4'
--2009-10-11 10:57:48--
http://www.or
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 24 January 2009 12:11:41 Rod wrote:
I'm getting the following error too much, many packages are no longer
insalling with this problem ;o(
* Running elibtoolize in: libmcrypt-2.5.8
* Applying install-sh-1.5.patch ...
* Portage patch fail
Is there a patch file to patch mkisofs to use the --duplicates-once
option during generation of iso9960/UDF images?
The problem is that the one that exists right now, the patch (against
the official sources) cannot be found because the original site
(bootcd.ru) is permanently down.
Or do I need to
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:56:17 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
> Hi I was reading the bug report 114915 at gentoo bugzilla and it
> mentions a patch to ebuid, I had downloaded the patch but I don't have
> any clue about how can I apply it to current ebuid.
As root:
cd /usr/po
>
> Somewhere in this thread was a mention of a failed patch.
>
> Where version of patch are you using? If it's 2.6, downgrade it as 2.6 is
> horribly broken
>
> http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/12/01/gentoo-service-announcement-keep-clear-of-
> gnu-patch-2-6
>
The
Am 15/02/2012 04:59, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
»Q« [12-02-14 18:12]:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:49 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
How can I circumvent the problem?
I can't vouch for it, but there's a patch attached to the bug.
<https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37
Hello, Gentoo.
Over the last few months I've posted several versions of my kernel patch
which re-enables soft scrollback. I thought at the time I could just
keep a few files informally in my home directory. But I'm already
getting confused about what is where, what applies to wh
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 20:31 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Thanks for the info, but I notice that there's also a patch to
> portage.py attached to the bug. Is it correct to just patch it with the
> standard "patch -p1 blah blah blah" (patch syntax doesn't roll
> trip
s:
INFO: unpack
Applying gtk+-1.2.10-m4.patch ...
Applying gtk+-1.2.10-r8-gentoo.diff.bz2 ...
Applying gtk+-1.2-locale_fix.patch ...
Running elibtoolize in: gtk+-1.2.10
Applying portage-1.3.4.patch ...
Applying sed-1.5.6.patch ...
Applying tmp-1.3.5.patch ...
Applying uclibc-ltconf-1.3.0.patch ...
gt; LICENSE="Apache-2.0"
>> SLOT="0"
>> KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
>> IUSE="google"
>>
>> DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
>> virtual/perl-Module-Build"
>> RDEPEND="dev-perl/SOAP-Lite
>> dev-perl/Class-
gt;>
>>Hi,
>>Revdep-rebuild is in portage-package, as '/usr/bin/revdep-rebuild'.
>>It's a shell-script, no need to compile it, just to unpack/place it.
>>You could copy the new one over the old one (make a backup first).
>>Later check the flags/permissions
Gentoo forum :
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7754020.html?sid=3b9fed3069c0b6644c1a41e839455b85
I tried to apply the patch
/etc/portage/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-340.76.patch
*--- a/kernel/nv-pat.c.orig *
*+++ b/kernel/nv-pat.c *
*@@ -35,8 +35,13 @@ *
* unsigned long
Leonardo wrote:
> Thanks Rumen,
> that was it; now I have problems applying the patch, but I think
> I can figure it out.
>
> Thanks to Neil too.
>
> Ciao, Leo
>
> --- Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> If you don't have portag
The patch was borked. Either bump to latest sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 or
resync later. It is fixed now.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi.
This issue is really pissing me off, I have ried almost all the
fixes, even to the point of booting and copying a Stage3 tarball over
the running system and doing a Stage3 Install.
No matter what I do, and for almost ALL packages I get ..
* Portage patch failed to apply
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:18 +0200, Robert Svoboda wrote:
> * Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-17 04:40]:
> > - is it possible to patch the gentoo-sources kernel with the suspend2
> > patch? Or will it only apply cleanly to a vanilla kernel?
>
> I patched my stan
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, David Abbott wrote:
> Here is the patch to fix totem-pl-parser with the new quvi api
> https://386651.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=289447&action=diff&collapsed=&context=patch&format=raw&headers=1
> HTH
> David
Thank you. I follow t
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:31 +0200, Fabrice Delliaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Explanation && patch here :
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-libtool@gnu.org/msg00838.html
I saved the patch at the above link to /root/libtool.patch, but I can't
figure out how to use it. I
Looks like a good patch but can you link to instructions for applying
this patch?
Fabio Scaccabarozzi wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> That is expected with 4.10 kernels.
> You can grab a patch from my /etc/portage repository:
> https://github.com/fsvm88/gentoo-portage_etc/blob/master/p
7;ing hardened about this patch at the
hardened ML. Maybe they patch and forward the 4.4.8-r1 to 4.4.8-r2 .
---
Only now looked at the patch.
No, you don't get it. And I'm not CC'ing this to hardened ML.
You can't just run the patch for a vanilla kernel onto a
grsecurity-patched ker
> Here is the perl script:
>
> http://pastebin.com/YM3G5sKn
>
> Can anyone with perl and ebuild knowledge determine if the script
> could be incorporated into an ebuild? David Abbott and I are working
> on getting google-api-adwords-perl into portage and this is a
> dependency.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 09:38:26 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
>>
>> It looks like i have hit this gcc 4.7 build bug:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
>>
>> Theres a patch attached to the bug i'd l
On 02/18/2018 12:14 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 12:01:54 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> I've tried this propose patch.
>> https://621532.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=511304
>>
>> save it to a file patch.patch
>> went
Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 01:39:17 schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 00:46:56 schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> [...]
>
> I've meanwhile found out that it might be related to a DNS lookup bug inside
> qmail and found an old patch that should addresses this issue. The
On 28 June 2010 15:40, justin wrote:
> The patch was borked. Either bump to latest sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 or
> resync later. It is fixed now.
Thanks, will have another go.
--
Regards,
Mick
> > ebuild zd1211-83.ebuild digest (which worked fine)
> > >
> > > but, what should be the content of /tmp/net_dev.patch
> >
> > You list two patches.
> >
> > The one for the ebuild you should apply to the ebuild manually
> > using '
when this patch is going to get into the portage??
thanks
Eliezer
Original Message
Subject: Re: PATCH: "postfix start" master initialization status
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:56:38 +0200
From: Eray Aslan
To: postfix-us...@postfix.org
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:00:
On 10/11/06, Matthew R. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The arecord apeared to work, but when I played it back with aplay - silence!
At this point you may want to try the patch that you found on the
forums. Unfortunately it doesn't apply cleanly against 1.0.13, and
the original p
I've set the ebuild up in an overlay and added:
epatch ${FILESDIR}/qt-4.3.1-r1_gcc3.4_compile_fix.diff
to the ebuild alongside other patches, but the patch always fails with this:
^[[31;01mACCESS DENIED^[[0m rename:
/usr/portage/x11-libs/qt/qt-4.3.1-r1.ebuild
patch: Can't rename
Andrey Vul wrote:
> Is there a patch file to patch mkisofs to use the --duplicates-once
> option during generation of iso9960/UDF images?
> The problem is that the one that exists right now, the patch (against
> the official sources) cannot be found because the original site
>
* Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-17 04:40]:
> - is it possible to patch the gentoo-sources kernel with the suspend2
> patch? Or will it only apply cleanly to a vanilla kernel?
I patched my standard gentoo kernel this way:
http://onyon.net/index
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 3:36 PM Dale wrote:
> * patch -p1 failed with
>
/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03/files/nvidia-drivers-470.141.03-clang15.patch
You know I don't run Gentoo, right?
That looks weird to me - building 470.182.03 but patching it with
recognised with standard 2.6.15 kernel...
>
> But there is unofficial patch/mod for ahci.c, and right now
> I'm testing it. BTW, I have read on via forum that kernel-dev's
> refused to include this patch in official kernel tree, because
> there is something peculiar about
On 15/04/18 03:30, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I'm trying to patch audacity-2.1.3-r1 (as it fails to compile) with the patch
provided in Gentoo-Bug forum:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618326
I've edited the /etc/portage/bashrc:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/porta
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently doing a python-updater run. While the rebuilding
> of the several packages the process failed with
>
> >>> Downloading
> 'http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/db/update/4.7.25/patch.4.
tage/$package-version-rev./work/$package-version-rev./
> patch -pX[0|1|2] --dry-run -i /path/to/patch/file/file-patch
> Watch for errors, if any.
> If patching is successful run:
> #ebuild
> /usr/local/portage/$category/$package-version-rev.ebuild
> compile
> #ebuild
> /u
On Mar 24, 2013 5:30 PM, "Sascha Cunz" wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 01:39:17 schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> > Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 00:46:56 schrieb Sascha Cunz:
> > [...]
> >
> > I've meanwhile found out that it might be related to a DNS looku
Matthias Hanft wrote:
>
> So it seems that I cannot emerge "patch" because I need to patch
> "patch" :-( Am I stuck now??? What to do??
I copied "/usr/bin/patch" from another (glibc-2.27) Gentoo system.
Patching now works, but at every emerge (for e
Hi list,
just now my Acer TM2313 is emerging system at home. If I return home
from work I plan to complete the installation.
My question: Is gentoo-sources patched with the acpi_sbs patch or will I
need to get it somewhere and patch it myself?
Googling around I found (on the Gentoo forum ;) that
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:23:31 +0200, Eray Aslan wrote:
> > You'll just have to keep an eye for upgrades, because they
> > will probably come without this patch. If you want this patch to be
> > included in postfix create a bug in bugzilla with the request.
>
> I don&
On 9/16/06, David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings,
I recently noticed a keyboard problem (ctrl left arrow moves a word to
the _right_ when using the numeric keypad) and now have a patch for
GTK, specifically file gtk+-2.8.19/gtk/gtktextview.c.
What's the best way
= -DGCCK
That IS what the patch file looks like. It will alter your Makefile, and
the epatch function in portage is smart enough to try apply the patch
to the following files in order:
/root/tmp-new/Makefile
tmp-new/Makefile
Makefile
If that doesn't work, the patch itself is faulty
for m
/var/tmp/portage/net-firewall/ipset-6.20.1/work
>>> Preparing source in
>>> /var/tmp/portage/net-firewall/ipset-6.20.1/work/ipset-6.20.1 ...
* Sorry, but you have to patch kernel sources with the following patch:
* # cd /usr/src/linux
* # patch -i
/var/tmp/portage/net-firewall/i
Here is the perl script:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/YM3G5sKn
>>
>> Can anyone with perl and ebuild knowledge determine if the script
>> could be incorporated into an ebuild? David Abbott and I are working
>> on getting google-api-adwords-perl into portage an
t;
> Have you tried --keep-going?
>
> > ##
> >
> >>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> >
> > !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found:
> > /usr/portage/dev-python/pygments/files/pygments-2.2.0-sphinx17.patch
> >
> > !!
intermediate versions. Where would I even start searching to find
> this out?
Hey Alan,
The official repository I think is
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/.
What I would do is apply your patch on top of that, and then to update
it, rebase the patch onto th
t it shows up on almost any occasion now.
It's been happening to me increasingly often in the last few
months/years. I don't like it.
Here is a recipe for reproducing the phenomenon. A typical way of
invoking patch is by supplying the patch file to standard input:
$ patch --dry-ru
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:12:09AM -0700, walt wrote:
> I'm using all the same versions on my ~amd64 and having no problems.
> I just re-merged util-linux without errors, so it's worrisome that the
> patch fails. Filesystem corruption?
>
> Smells to me like hardwar
rvice Informatique
8 rue Saint Augustin - 75002 Paris
Email: er...@easy-info.com
Tel: +33 (0)1 42 96 06 71
Fax: +33 (0)1 42 96 41 72
De : Erwan RIGOLLOT [mailto:er...@rigollot.eu]
Envoyé : lundi 27 mars 2017 13:41
À : gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Objet : [gentoo-user] elibtoolize Portage patch requ
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 02:56 -0300, Fernando Canizo wrote:
> El 31/ago/2005 a las 00:23 -0300, Nick me decía:
> > 2. Fernando might like to note that the way to introduce a patch to a
> > package (rather than an amendment to the ebuild) is to use the epatch
> > command. Commonl
I'm getting an error.
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200/work/webkitgtk-2.4.11'
make: *** [GNUmakefile:25837: all] Error 2
* ERROR: net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200::gentoo failed (compile phase):
* emake failed
I've tried this p
/usr/local/portage/sys-kernel/win4lin-sources/files
/usr/local/portage/sys-kernel/win4lin-sources/files/gentoo-sources-2.4.28.brk-locked.patch
/usr/local/portage/sys-kernel/win4lin-sources/files/gentoo-sources-2.4.CAN-2004-1137.patch
/usr/local/portage/sys-kernel/win4lin-sources/files/gentoo-sources
nt
to play with the tar pit module for..let's say "academic purposes" ;-)
Unfortunately I had no luck. Clean kernel, the latest patch-o-matic, the
latest iptables and the same result. Obviously gentoo-sources is
incompatible with tar pit module. ;-(
I'm attaching here a file calle
ducts/berkeley-db/db/update/4.
> >>>7.25/patch.4.7.25.4'
>
> --2009-10-11 10:57:48--
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/db/update/4.7.25/pat
> ch.4.7.25.4 Resolving www.oracle.com... 80.157.150.10, 80.157.150.33
> Connecting to www.
1 - 100 of 3226 matches
Mail list logo
