Thanks for the replies folks, I think I may just stay with F-Prot. But one
thing is still confusing me.. Why did some people get a def file on the 18th
that caught netsky, but mine didn't. On the 20th, I even went so far as to
re-install f-prot which initially installs a July 02 def file, and ran the
updater just to make sure that I was getting the latest updated file as it
was being distributed by F-Prot, and I still got the 18th def file, which
according to Terry here, was catching it, but mine wasn't... Any ideas with
that glitch?  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smart 
>Business Support
>Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 9:28 AM
>To: Mike VandeBerg
>Subject: Re: [sniffer] F-Prot and netsky
>
>Mike,
>
>Tuesday, February 24, 2004 you wrote:
>MV> I was wondering if anyone else is using F-prot for their virus 
>MV> engine in declude, and what they now think about it. Netsky was 
>MV> discovered on the 18th, and F-Prot actually had it posted on their 
>MV> website as being discovered by them on the 19th. But they didn't 
>MV> update their definition files to actually catch it until 
>early this 
>MV> morning. This meant that netsky ran rampant under F-Prots 
>nose for 6 
>MV> days. I feel this is completely unacceptable, and I am going to 
>MV> change my virus engine this week unless someone can tell 
>me that there is a good reason why I shouldn't.
>
>  This is not our experience.  Here's an excerpt form our virus
>  reporter for the 18th.  Scanner 1 is Fprot.  Scanner 2 is NAI
>  (McAfee).  So on the 18th Fprot caught 39 it identified as Netsky.
>  However, some of these were corrupted.  All in all I'm happy with
>  F-prot but I see enough difference to run 2 and might add a 3rd:
>
>> From: 02/18/2004 00:00:30 Thru 02/18/2004 23:59:36 Log files: 
>> vir0218.log
>> 
>> Scanner 1 Virus names
>>         VBS/Haptime.F  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]  = 4
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (corrupted)  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]  = 5
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]  = 39
>> 
>> Scanner 1 Days
>>         02/18/2004 = 52
>> 
>> Scanner 2 Virus names
>>         VBS/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus  = 4
>>         W32/Bugbear.b.dam virus  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus  = 1
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus  = 3
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus  = 2
>>         W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus  = 14
>>         W32/Sober!data trojan  = 3
>> 
>> Scanner 2 Days
>>         02/18/2004 = 30
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>Terry Fritts
>
>
>This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For 
>information and (un)subscription instructions go to 
>http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Reply via email to