In defense of Declude, I can clearly say with knowledge they have had a MAJOR problem with “customers” stealing their product. I will not go into any detail of what I know, but suffice it to say I was flabbergasted and shocked when I was told the estimated amount.
Scott is doing what he does best, work on the product and support it. What the new owners of the company are doing is trying to bring control and administration to the company as a whole.
Declude has gone way beyond where it was at 3 ½ years ago when I became involved in e-mail, and to Scott’s credit the company became more than what he could handle.
I am confidant that as time progresses, the inherent bugs of what the management of Declude is trying to accomplish while working with the Declude community as a whole will be ironed out for the benefit of all.
Declude is in a time period of major change, for the good, which began earlier this year. Let’s work with them, not against them. After all, patience is a virtue. And that is something which society as a whole is lacking in today’s environment.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You
-----Original Message-----
John, I've always respected your opinions. I've respected Scott at Declude as well, but I don't think he has much to say about what happens there anymore.
The powers to be at Declude obviously look at their customers as theives trying to steal their product. I have installed a version of Declude that is not covered under by any current service policy in attempts to solve a problem. When I discovered the old version of Declude was not the problem I reverted back. My attempt was rewarded with a threatening email message. I looked at it quite differently. I have no need or want for the new Declude "features", but if the old version I purchased was defective I am due version that worked as advertised. It was up to me to find that out. I'm perfectly happy with the old version, and I expect it to work as advertised.
Their attitude is a spin off of the Ipswitch attitude to move on to new versions without ever fixing the old ones. For example, the new version of Declude (2.0) lists 10 new features. Of those 10, four are listed as "fixes" for older versions. I know I'm in the minority but I believe it is Declude's responsibility to provide a fully functional 1.x verson to those who purchased it. The 2.0 should only include new features, not fixes from previous versions. If I wanted to purcase 2.0 for the new features that would be fine, but to be forced to purchase a new version or service agreement to get fixes for problems in a version you already purcased is just plain wrong.
What if that mentality were to be accepted in the automobile business? You buy a new car and the air conditioner doesn't work. You're told that instead of the 2004 model you purchased you should pay to upgrade to a 2005 model because we finally got the air conditioner working for 2005. Doesn't matter that your 2004 was advertised with air conditioning or not.
I've had it with that kind of attitude. I want a simple, efficient mail server that does exactly what is advertised. Nothing more, nothing less.
As for Sniffer. I've had no complaints with it at all. Seems to do exactly what I was told it would do.
Thanks to everyone for their input!
-Joe
|
Title: Message
- RE: [sniffer] Change in coding policies Landry William
- [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Joe Wolf
- RE: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Craig Deal
- Re: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Pete McNeil
- Re: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Matt
- RE: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... John Tolmachoff (Lists)
- Re: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Joe Wolf
- RE: [sniffer] Sniffer update... John Tolmachoff (Lists)
- RE: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Michiel Prins
- Re: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Jim Matuska
- Re: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Scott Fosseen
- Re: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Info Wind
- Re: [sniffer] Sniffer updates... Matt
- Re[2]: [sniffer] Sniffer updates.... Pete McNeil