Hi Chris;
 
What is the 2nd IF frequency of the Icom-706. I would be very interested to 
make it work in other radios. 
 
I was looking at the Flex-1500 too and then I tried the software and I was not 
impressed with it. The software is the weak link of the Flex radio. It has been 
written quite a while ago and it was never revised or updated to reflect 
today’s computer needs. 
Also the DADP that we are going to launch uses similar software filters that 
the Flex radio software uses and the base audio engine is written in Java. If 
you know NetBeans and Java we could need the help!
The MDSR kit is still a while away, but we are moving into that direction....
 
Thanks;
 
Alex
VE7DXW
 



________________________________
From: Chris <cbm...@xtra.co.nz>
To: soft_radio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 8:41:48 PM
Subject: [soft_radio] Re: software transceiver

  
Hi Alex,

I guess for anyone who already has a FT-817 your MDSR would be good a good 
solution.

Any chance of a version to suit the Icom 706 family? I would buy one for sure - 
and maybe cancel my order for the new the new Flex 1500 five watter. See 
http://www.flex- radio.com/ Products. aspx?topic= F1.5k_features

73, Chris ZL1BOE

--- In soft_ra...@yahoogro ups.com, Alex Schwarz <alexschwarz237@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris;
>  
> I am aware of the Flex radios. Also the fact that their TX modulation still 
> happens inside the radio box. Also the price for the radio is extremely steep.
> MDSR is a development that is affordable for the regular HAM operator and it 
> builds on what is already exists in the shack.
> The MDSR concept is so simple that everybody can build it without a lot of 
> expenses. In the near future we will offer a MDSR kit.
>  
> The Flex5000 costs a lot of money...the MDSR kit with free software will run 
> at ablaut $50.-
>  
> Do I need to say more.....
>  
> Alex
> VE7DXW
>  
> 
> 
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Chris <cbm...@...>
> To: soft_ra...@yahoogro ups.com
> Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 2:01:29 PM
> Subject: [soft_radio] Re: software transceiver
> 
>   
> Hi Alex,
> 
> What the URL describes seems to be very far from a "full blown software 
> transceiver" in that it needs a soundcard and a complete conventional radio 
> (FT-817) to work!
> 
> For true "full blown SDR transceivers you should take a look at the Flex 
> 5000, 3000 and 1500 transceivers. They are are highly sophisticated complete 
> SDR transceivers. The Flex 5000 is is up there with the best conventional ham 
> transceivers and are now the choice of many "big gun" DX'ers who have shelved 
> top class conventional rigs like Icom 7700, FTDX9000, Elecraft K3, etc.
> 
> At a another level you should take a look at the relatively low cost Icom 
> 7000 transceiver - one of a number of contemporary transceivers using so 
> called "IF DSP". The Icom 7000 does not even claim to be an SDR and probably 
> most owners have no idea that at its lowest IF of 16.5KHz it is pure SDR with 
> all filters, modulation, demodulation etc being implemented digitally. This 
> at least matches what you are describing and it does not even need a 
> computer! About all that is missing is a decent spectrum and waterfall 
> display. Add on a RFSpace SDRIQ which can track automatically and you fix 
> that and get two extra demodulation channels.
> 
> 73, Chris ZL1BOE
> 
> --- In soft_ra...@yahoogro ups.com, Alex Schwarz <alexschwarz237@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Leif;
> >  
> > I read your e-mail to ask if there is a software transceiver out there. And 
> > yes there is...it is called MDSR (Modulation Demodulation Software radio).
> >  
> > It uses the optional filter port of an already existing radio like the 
> > FT-817 and up and downconverts the IF to 12kHz. This is fed into the 
> > soundcard in and output and you have a full blown softeware transceiver. I 
> > am pretty sure this concept would work for 2m.
> >  
> > Please check out: http://users. skynet.be/ myspace/mdsr  and select the 
> > BiLIF link for the writeup. 
> >  
> >  
> > Thanks;
> >  
> > Alex
> > VE7DXW
> >
>





      

Reply via email to