Tim: I wouldn't say that *all* pipelines are rigid and unadaptable. If a pipeline is thoughtfully built from the ground up to be flexible and scale in scope of its "involvement" from project to project, then it it does not have to be gaff-taped, it simply rolls with the needs of a particular style of project.
Sebastien: As far as IT and licensing, the more legwork that you can do for you IT guy (proof of license, type of license, download link, etc.) the more that he'll see that you are trying to help him and the more likely that he'll help you back. Just a thought, -=Eric On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, David Gallagher < davegsoftimagel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow, it's so close to the tweak tool, they should give Softimage a nod. > > This looks great. However, without the rigging integration, it's not very > alluring to me. > Dave > > > On 1/8/2013 10:45 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote: > >> If you're miserable modeling in Maya, I'd suggest using the NEX >> plug-in for Maya. >> It's very softimage-like, with a tweak tool and a command panel like XSI >> https://draster.com/nex-1.5/**overview.html<https://draster.com/nex-1.5/overview.html> >> >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:12 AM, David Gallagher >> <davegsoftimagel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> "if you have used softimage in production you would doubtless realise >>> that >>> one does not ease back so readily into maya. " >>> >>> Ha! It will be a cold day in hell before I go back to modeling/rigging in >>> Maya. >>> >>> > -- -=T=-
