Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as facet.field works.
Cheers Avlesh On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Avlesh Singh<[email protected]> wrote: > > Should multiple values for facet.prefix be supported? > > I have come across several use-cases on the user mailing list where such > a > > functionality could have helped (The latest one being - > > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/2a9c44d4f015b5e5/facet_filtering > ). > > I ran into one such use last night. > > > > Is there a general agreement on the enhancement? > > Yes, I think it's a good idea. > It's just that the current syntax doesn't quite support it yet. > > I think that once again, local params are the answer... the same as > they were with faceting on a single field but excluding different > filters. > > facet.field={!prefix=foo key=label1}myfield > facet.field={!prefix=bar key=label2}myfield > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com >
