: > Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as
: > facet.field works.
:
: The problem then becomes labels.
: facet.field=foo goes under the label "foo"
:
: We already have a mechanism to re-label results, seems like we should use
that?
i think Avlesh is just suggesting that...
facet.field=foo & f.foo.facet.prefix=a & f.foo.facet.prefix=z
...should result in a single facet.field result section for "foo" with the
values that start with "a" and the values that start with "b"
it seems like in an ideal world, both syntaxes would work -- the one above
to make a single section, and the one below to have two seperate
sections...
: >> I think that once again, local params are the answer... the same as
: >> they were with faceting on a single field but excluding different
: >> filters.
: >>
: >> facet.field={!prefix=foo key=label1}myfield
: >> facet.field={!prefix=bar key=label2}myfield
-Hoss
