> > So if you asked for the top 10, you would be fine with receiving all A* or > all B* of those happened to be the top? Or do you really want the top 10 A* > and the top 10 B*?
For all use cases so far, yes. No, that's just the thing - multiple prefixes specified this way would be > the same logical facet.. hence no way to specify different limits, sorts, or > whatever... those are per facet. > Awesome, we are all on the same page then. So, this is it - facet.field=myField&f.foo.facet.prefix=foo&f.foo.facet.prefix=bar Right? Cheers Avlesh On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Avlesh Singh<[email protected]> wrote: > > Different ways to look at it Yonik. For things that I have needed this > for, > > so far (field:A* OR field:B*) was just as fine. > > So if you asked for the top 10, you would be fine with receiving all > A* or all B* of those happened to be the top? Or do you really want > the top 10 A* and the top 10 B*? > > > Anyways, for me to file the ticket, what usage are we looking for? As > > underneath? > > facet.field=myField&f.foo.facet.prefix=foo&f.foo.facet.prefix=bar > > > > How would sort, limit and other parameters be passed? As underneath? > > f.foo.facet.prefix.foo.sort=false&f.foo.facet.prefix.foo.limit=100 > > No, that's just the thing - multiple prefixes specified this way would > be the same logical facet.. hence no way to specify different limits, > sorts, or whatever... those are per facet. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com >
